바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The effect of Job Autonomy on Job Satisfaction: The multilevel investigation of the mediating role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement

Abstract

Work engagement has been widely studied in organizational research owing to its impact on organizational behaviors and outcomes. We proposed and tested a mediation model that examine within-individual level job crafting and work engagement relationships between job autonomy and job satisfaction. We collected multilevel data using repeated measurement design and 119 participants and 1190 data points at within-individual level. To analyze hypotheses, we use multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM). The results showed that within-individual level job crafting positively related to work engagement. Also, job crafting and work engagement mediated the relationship between job autonomy and job satisfaction. Implications of these results for theory, practice and directions for future research are discussed.

keywords
work engagement, job crafting, MSEM, within-individual level, mediation, 직무개선, 일 열의, 다수준 구조방정식(MSEM), 개인내 수준, 매개모형

Reference

1.

김창호, 심원술 (2012). 리더의 진실성이 부하의 장인적 직무수행 (Job Crafting) 에 미치는 영향과 그 과정에 대한 연구. 조직과 인사관리연구, 34, 131-162.

2.

김추강, 배을규 (2015). HRD 컨설턴트의 능동적 직무 수행과 직무 열의의 관계: 자기주도학습 능력의 조절효과. 직업교육연구, 34(4), 51-71.

3.

김혜선, 탁진국 (2015). 리더의 임파워링 행동이 직무 열의에 미치는 영향 - 직무개선의 매개효과와 핵심자기평가 및 개인-직무 부합의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지 산업 및 조직, 28(2), 275-299.

4.

서재현 (2015). 일의 의미가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 직무 재창조, 자부심, 조화열정을 중심으로. HRD 연구 (구 인력개발연구), 17(4), 47-76.

5.

이철희, 신강현, & 허창구 (2012). 변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십이 직무열의에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25 (1), 147-169.

6.

임명기, 하유진, 오동준, & 손영우 (2014). 한국판 잡 크래프팅 척도 (JCQ-K) 의 타당화 연구. 기업경영연구(구 동림경영연구), 56(단일호), 181-206.

7.

Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., & Waterson, P. E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265-285.

8.

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using job demands-resources model: State of the art. Human resource management, 43, 83-104.

9.

Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.

10.

Bakker, A. B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Vergel, A. I. S. (2016). Modelling job crafting behaviours: Implications for work engagement. Human relations, 69, 169-189.

11.

Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187-200.

12.

Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. human relations, 65, 1359-1378.

13.

Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551-570.

14.

Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Daily self-management and employee work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 31-38.

15.

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work Engagement, A Quantitative Review and Test of its Relation with Task and Contextual Performance, Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136.

16.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Shaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands- resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512.

17.

Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2000). Control and complexity in work and the development of personal initiative (PI): A four-wave longitudinal structural equation model of occupational socialization. University of Giessen: Manuscript submitted for publication.

18.

Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37-63.

19.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden- and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.

20.

Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annuals, 3, 317-375.

21.

Hakanen, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands-resources model to predict engagement: Analysing a conceptual model. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research: (pp. 85-101). Psychology Press.

22.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.

23.

Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

24.

Hobfoll, S. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.

25.

Holman, D. J., & Wall, T. D. (2002). Work characteristics, learning-related outcomes, and strain: A test of competing direct effects, mediated, and moderated models. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 283-301.

26.

Hox, J. (2000). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management ournal, 33, 692-724.

28.

Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Nezlek, J. B., Dossche, D., & Timmermans, T. (2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and adjustment. Emotion, 7, 262-274. doi:10.1037/ 1528-3542.7.2.262

29.

Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 934-945.

30.

Latham, G. P & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the Twenty-first century, Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485-516.

31.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407-416.

32.

Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2003). Work design. In W. Borman, R. Klimoski, & D. Ilgen (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12), Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 423-452). New York: John Wiley.

33.

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321-1339.

34.

Mulligan, C. B., Schneider, B., & Wolfe, R. N. (2000). Time use and population representation in the Sloan Study of Adolescents. Unpublished manuscript, Alfred P. Sloan/University of Chicago Center for the Study of Working Families.

35.

Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory, Psychological methods, 17, 313-335.

36.

Parker, S. K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 447-469.

37.

Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters W. C. M., Schaufeli, B. W., & Hetland J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 1120- 1141

38.

Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635.

39.

Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 161-182.

40.

Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester interaction record. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: (pp. 270-318). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

41.

Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate. Journal of applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.

42.

Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B, (2010). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, (pp. 118-131). Psychology Press.

43.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. 2003. Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

44.

Schaufeli, B. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demand, job resource, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.

45.

Schaufeli, B. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, (pp. 10-24). Psychology Press.

46.

Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.

47.

Sonnentag, S., Mojza, J. E., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 842-853.

48.

Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010). Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 487-506.

49.

Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 841-849.

50.

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2011). Do transformational leaders enhance their followers' daily work engagement?. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 121-131.

51.

LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of applied psychology, 83(6), 853.

52.

Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1995). New manufacturing initiatives and shop floor job design. In the changing nature of work, ed. A Howard, (pp. 139-74). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

53.

Wall, T. D., Jackson, P. R., & Davids, K. (1992). Operator work design and robotics system performance: A serendipitous field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 353-362.

54.

Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

55.

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, (pp. 1-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

56.

Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.

57.

Wrzeniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.

58.

Xanthopoulou D, Bakker A. B, Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183-200.

59.

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 345-356.

60.

Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 301-322.

61.

Zuzanek, J., & Veal, A. (1999). Time pressure, stress, leisure participation and well-being, Society and leisure, 21, 319-590.

62.

Zyphur, J. M., Oswald, L. F., & Rupp, E. D. (2015). Rendezvous Overdue: Bayes Analysis Meets Organizational Research, Journal of Management, 41, 387-389.

logo