바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Relationship between Social Dominance Orientation and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Grandiosity and Dominance

Abstract

The purposes of this study were, first, to confirm the internal structure of social dominance orientation by using Korean working adult sample. Second is to investigate the effect of social dominance orientation on the employee’s contextual performance at the facet level, along with exploring the possible role of narcissistic self-concept(grandiosity) and interpersonal motive(dominance). Using the survey research method, data were collected from 411 employees who were working in a variety of organizations in Korea. The results of study showed that subdimensions of social dominance orientation(SDO-D, SDO-E) were significantly correlated with each other and SDO-E factor was negatively related with interpersonal facilitation. SDO-D factor was not significantly related with neither interpersonal facilitation nor job dedication. However, grandiosity and dominance fully mediated the relationship between SDO-D factor and both subdimensions of contextual performance. Based on these results, we discussed the implications of study, limitations, and the suggestions for future research.

keywords
social dominance orientation, contextual performance, narcissism, grandiosity, dominance, 사회지배지향성, 맥락수행, 나르시시즘, 웅대성, 지배성

Reference

1.

라만엠디아니술 (2017). 사회지배 지향성, 자존감 및 양가적 성차별 태도 간의 관계. 전북대학교 석사학위논문.

2.

정범모 (1971). 인성검사 요강. 서울: 코리안테스팅센터.

3.

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

4.

Aiello, A., Pratto, F., & Pierro, A. (2013). Framing social dominance orientation and power in organizational context. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 35(5), 487-495.

5.

Altemeyer, B. (2004a). Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(4), 421-448.

6.

Altemeyer, B. (2004b). The other “authoritarian personality” In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: key readings (pp. 85-107). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.

7.

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (3rd ed. rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

8.

Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574- 601.

9.

Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009a). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face- to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491-503.

10.

Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009b). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295- 298.

11.

Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1094-1110.

12.

Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122.

13.

Baumgardner, A. H. (1990). To know oneself is to like oneself: Self-certainty and self-affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1062-1072.

14.

Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch Jr, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241-255.

15.

Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095.

16.

Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98.

17.

Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J. (1993) Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 52-69.

19.

Bratt, C., Sidanius, J., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2016). Shaping the development of prejudice: Latent growth modeling of the influence of social dominance orientation on outgroup affect in youth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(12), 1617-1634.

20.

Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. Lonner & J. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

21.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.

22.

Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L., & Koch, P. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communications Monographs, 65(4), 308-335.

23.

Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1980). The frequency concept of disposition: Dominance and prototypically dominant acts. Journal of Personality, 48(3), 379-392.

24.

Buss, D. M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D. S., & Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1219-1229.

25.

Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 538-549.

26.

Chow, R. M., Lowery, B. S., & Hogan, C. M. (2013). Appeasement: Whites’ strategic support for affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 332-345.

27.

Cichocka, A., Dhont, K., & Makwana, A. P. (2017). On self-love and outgroup-hate: Opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 31(4), 366-384.

28.

Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25-44.

29.

Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69(3), 161-182.

30.

De Cremer, D., Cornelis, I., & Van Hiel, A. (2008). To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of social dominance orientation. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(1), 61-76.

31.

Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(3), 541-553.

32.

Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive- motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). Academic Press.

33.

Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(7), 1199-1213.

34.

Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & De Witte, H. (2007). The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: Their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 757-782.

35.

Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 291-300.

36.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

37.

Farwell, L., & Wohlwend-Lloyd, R. (1998). Narcissistic processes: Optimistic expectations, favorable self‐evaluations, and self‐enhancing attributions. Journal of Personality, 66(1), 65-83.

38.

Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216.

39.

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-96.

40.

Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The adjective check list manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.

41.

Halali, E., Dorfman, A., Jun, S., & Halevy, N. (2018). More for us or more for me? Social dominance as parochial egoism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 254- 262.

42.

Halkjelsvik, T., & Rise, J. (2014). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and willingness to help addicted individuals: The role of responsibility judgments. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 27-40.

43.

Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402-1413.

44.

Hart, W., Adams, J. M., Burton, K. A., Shreves, W., & Hamilton, J. C. (2012). Shaping reality vs. hiding from reality: Reconsidering the effects of trait need for closure on information search. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 489-496.

45.

Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2014). Dimensions of social dominance orientation: The roles of legitimizing myths and national identification. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 538-549.

46.

Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003-1028.

47.

Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy- Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583-606.

48.

Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 686-690.

49.

Holtzman, N. S., Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2010). Sounds like a narcissist: Behavioral manifestations of narcissism in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 478- 484.

50.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

51.

Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson personality inventory- revised manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.

52.

Jahangir, N., Akbar, M. M., & Haq, M. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. BRAC University Journal, 1(2), 75-85.

53.

Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521 -531.

54.

Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self- esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among african americans and european americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209-232.

55.

Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): Development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 193-205.

56.

Kalma, A. P., Visser, L., & Peeters, A. (1993). Sociable and aggressive dominance: Personality differences in leadership style?. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 45-64.

57.

Kandler, C., Bell, E., & Riemann, R. (2016). The structure and sources of right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Personality, 30 (4), 406-420.

58.

Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.

59.

Khan, A. K., Moss, S., Quratulain, S., & Hameed, I. (2016). When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1177/0149206316653930

60.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

61.

Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901-931.

62.

Kteily, N. S., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2011). Social dominance orientation: cause or ‘mere effect’?: Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 208-214.

63.

Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23(2-3), 117- 155.

64.

Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 402-410.

65.

Lord, R. G., Phillips, J. S., & Rush, M. C. (1980). Effects of sex and personality on perceptions of emergent leadership, influence, and social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(2), 176-182.

66.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

67.

McFarland, K, S. G., & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology. Vancouver. British Columbia.

68.

Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252-283.

69.

Morf, C. C., Horvath, S., & Torchetti, L. (2011). Narcissistic self-enhancement: Tales of (successful?) self-portrayal. In M. D. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 399-424). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

70.

Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (1993). Narcissism and self-evaluation maintenance: Explorations in object relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 668-676.

71.

Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177-196.

72.

Muchinsky, P. M., & Culbertson, S. S. (2015). Psychology applied to work (11th ed.). Summerfield, NC: Hypergraphic Press.

73.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

74.

Palmer, G. J. (1962). Task ability and effective leadership. Psychological Reports, 10(3), 863-866.

75.

Parkins, I. S., Fishbein, H. D., & Ritchey, P. N. (2006). The influence of personality on workplace bullying and discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(10), 2554-2577.

76.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271-320.

77.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763.

78.

Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.

79.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

80.

Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2), 590.

81.

Raskin, R., Novacek, J., & Hogan, R. (1991). Narcissistic self-esteem management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 911-918.

82.

Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890-902.

83.

Ridgeway, C. L. (1987). Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. American Sociological Review, 52(5), 683-694.

84.

Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The Causes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306-1314.

85.

Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies. Psychologica Belgica, 46(3), 235-252.

86.

Rogers, C. R. (1964). Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(2), 160-167.

87.

Ronningstam, E. (2005). Identifying and understanding the narcissistic personality. Oxford University Press.

88.

Ronningstam, E., Gunderson, J., & Lyons, M. (1995). Changes in pathological narcissism. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(2), 253-257.

89.

Saeri, A. K., Iyer, A., & Louis, W. R. (2015). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict outsiders’ responses to an external group conflict: Implications for identification, anger, and collective action. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 303-332.

90.

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman & P. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173-211). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

91.

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

92.

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Sinclair, S., & van Laar, C. (1996). Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices. Social Justice Research, 9(2), 145-170.

93.

Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11(3), 139-151.

94.

Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

95.

Swann, W. B. (1985). The self as architect of social reality. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 100-125). New York: Academic.

96.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

97.

Taris, T. W. (2000). Dispositional need for cognitive closure and self-enhancing beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(1), 35-50.

98.

Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). Academic Press.

99.

Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 781-790.

100.

Umphress, E. E., Simmons, A. L., Boswell, W. R., & Triana, M. D. C. (2008). Managing discrimination in selection: The influence of directives from an authority and social dominance orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 982-993.

101.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2017). Performance and Accountability Report.

102.

Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 824-837.

103.

Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525-531.

104.

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062.

105.

Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395-412.

106.

Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23-43.

107.

Zitek, E. M., & Jordan, A. H. (2016). Narcissism predicts support for hierarchy (at least when narcissists think they can rise to the top). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 707-716.

logo