-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
대학사서의 교수지위에 관한 연구
Study on Faculty Status for Academic Librarians
초록
이 연구의 목적은 지식정보사회가 요구하는 전문사서직의 한 유형으로서 교수사서제의 의의와 적용의 문제 그리고 그 발전 요소들을 논의하는데 있다. 대학사서에게 교수지위를 부여하게 된 배경과 발전과정을 개관하적, 부정적 영향을 고찰하였다. 마지막으로, 대학도서관의 교수사서제가 적용, 발전되기 위해서 검토되어야 할 문제점들을 교수사서의 직위체계, 자격, 평가 그리고 교육의 측면에서 논의하였다.
- keywords
- 대학도서관, 사서직, 대학사서, 교수지위, 교수사서, University library, Librarianship, Academic librarian, Faculty status, Faculty librarian, Professor librarian
Abstract
The pupose of the study is to define the concept of faculty librarian system and provide suggestions in developing the system as a professional mode suitable for academic librarianship. The background and development of the system were reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of faculty librarian system were addressed along with the investigations of the current status of professor librarians in USA. Key issues related to a rank system, qualification, evaluation and edcucation of faculty librarian were discussed in the light of implementing and promoting this system in domestic university libraries.
- keywords
- 대학도서관, 사서직, 대학사서, 교수지위, 교수사서, University library, Librarianship, Academic librarian, Faculty status, Faculty librarian, Professor librarian
참고문헌
(1999.) 대학도서관 사서의 자격 및 역할에 관한 연구., 성균관대학교 행정대학원.
(1996.) 대학도서관 이용을 위한 서지교육에 관한 연구. , 전주대학교 대학원.
(2001.) 사서직의 전문성 제고를 위한 계속교육 발전방안에 관한 연구., 상명대학교 대학원.
(1997.) 사립대학 사서직원의 인사관리, 20-34.
(18-22.) 최정태. 1978. 사서의 사회적 지위 특히 대학도서관을 중심으로. 국회도서관보,
회원교 편람.,
(2002.) “ACRL Guidelines forAcademic Status for College andUniversity Libraries.,
(2001) “ACRL Standards forFaculty Status for College andUnviersity Librarians.” [cited2005.1.25].<http,
ACRL. 1987. “ACRL Model Statement ofCriteria and Procedures for Appointment Promotion in academicRank and Tenure for College andUniversity Librarians.” [cited2005.1.30].<http,
(2002.) “ACRL JointStatement on Faculty Status ofCollege and University Librarians,
(1998.) ACRL Task Force on InstitutionalPriorities and Faculty Rewards,
Research and Assumptions.”Journal of Academic Librarianship,
An Alternative forLibrarians.” Jornal of AcademicLibrarianship,
and H.C. Selvin. 1983. “Status of AcademicLibrarians in New York State.”College & Research Libraries,
Priorities of the Professoriate.Princeton,
(2001) “Faculty Rank, Status, and Tenure for Librarians: Current Trends.” ,
(2001.) “The Mother of All Myths.” ,
(1996.) Redefining the Statusof the Librarian in Higher Education,
K. and W. Culotta. 1987. “TheAcademic Librarian and FacultyStatus in the 1980s,
(1999.) Professor Librarian: A Model of the Teaching Librarian of the Future,
(1999) Scholarly Publication by University Librarians: A Study at Penn State.” , R. L. 1999. “Scholarly Publicationby University Librarians
R. M. 1989. “The Challengesof Leading and Managing FacultyStatus Librarians.” Journal of AcademicLibrarianship,
F. E. and R. Hauptman. 1986. “ANew Perspective on Faculty Status.”College & Research Libraries,
(2003) “Faculty Status forLibrarians in Higher Education.”,
C. B. 1993. “The Status ofFaculty Status for Academic Librarians,
S. K. 1993. “Raising Our ProfessionalExpectations With a Two-Track Approach to Librarianship.”Journal of Academic Librarianship,
(1999.“) Publish or Perish: A Dilemma for Academic Librarians?” ,
AnIssue for Academic Librarians.” College& Research Libraries,
D. S. and P. F. Stenstrom.1986. “The Benefits of Research forAcademic Librarians and theInstitutions They Serve.” College& Research Libraries,
A 1989 NationalSurvey of Tenure and PromotionPolicies for Academic Librarians.”College & Research Libraries,
(1997) Professional or AcademicStatus for Academic Librarians A Survey of Faculty andStaff in Three Ohio Universities. ,
(2004.) Faculty and ProfessionalAppointments of AcademicLibrarians Expanding theOptions for Choice.”,
B. J. 1993. “The Myths SurroundingFaculty Status for Librarians.”College & Research LibrariesNews,
(1996.) “Faculty Status for Academic Librarians: the Search for the Holy Grail.” ,
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수