바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.39 No.4

Citation Share

Comparative Analysis on Current Status of Research University Libraries between Korea and the United States

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2005, v.39 no.4, pp.25-44

(2005). Comparative Analysis on Current Status of Research University Libraries between Korea and the United States. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 25-44.

Abstract

Research is one of main roles of university and its importance has been emphasized gradually since a few decades ago. Yet, the objective and concrete criterion for the definition of the research university is not available in Korea. Accordingly, the role of the research university library is not established as a key system for research university. In this study the criterion for the United States research university is applied to domestic universities, thereby current status of research universities and their libraries between the United States and Korea is analyzed comparatively. Fundamental data including budget, employees and information resources for pursuing high research competitiveness necessary for the research university library are provided based on comparative analysis of 98 research university libraries in the United States and 38 domestic research university libraries. Correlation analysis data between library investment and research publication are also provided. Finally this study can be used, hopefully, as a milestone for the establishing strategy of domestic research university libraries.

keywords
Research University Library, Research University, Research Competitiveness, 연구중심대학 도서관, 연구중심대학, 연구경쟁력, Research University Library, Research University, Research Competitiveness

Reference

1.

(2002.) 세계 수준의 연구중심대학 육성 및 성과관리 방향, . 교육인적자원부.

2.

(2000) 세계적 수준 10개 연구중심대학의 교육지표와 연구진흥 전략에 관한 연구, . 교육인적자원부.

3.

(2003) 대학의 연구능력 확충을 위한 연구지원체계의 혁신 ., 과학기술정책연구원.

4.

(1998.) “연구중심대학, 이렇게 하자.” , 서울: 연세대학교 교육연구소

5.

(2000.) “연구중심대학의 효과적 육성방안, 과학기술정책연구원.

6.

(2001) 한중일 3국의 연구중심대학 육성정책 ., 과학기술정책연구원.

7.

(2005.) 재정경제부 경제정책국 경제분석과. OECD 통계연보,

8.

(2004.) 고등교육기관 현황,

9.

(2004.) 한국도서관통계 2004,

10.

(2004) 한국 연구자의 2003년도 SCI인용지수분석, 교육인적자원부.

11.

(//ed.sjtu.cn/rank/2004/statistics.htm) Academic Ranking of World Universities. 상하이교통대학 고등교육연구소. cited on 2005.5.6,

12.

Association of Research Libraries 2004a. “Principles and Procedures of Mem- bership in the Association of Research Libraries. cited on 2005.3.14,

13.

Association of Research Libraries cited on 2005.3.22,

14.

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. “Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. cited on 2005.3.14,

15.

cited on 2005.5.6, The Times. 2004. “World University Ran- kings.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy