바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.42 No.1

Citation Share

Empirical Research to Understand the User Perception and Requirements of Library 2.0

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2008, v.42 no.1, pp.213-231


& (2008). Empirical Research to Understand the User Perception and Requirements of Library 2.0. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(1), 213-231.

Abstract

In this study, we wanted to find out about the perceptions and the requirements of the academic information service users about the Library 2.0. This study used the survey research method, which utilized the web-based survey using the academic information service users as the target population. Specifically, we studied whether and how the users recognized and experienced the Web 2.0 technologies and its related services with respect to Library 2.0. In addition, we gathered the requirements for the Library 2.0 concept applied information services. The analysis results showed that the users were in need of obtaining the most up-to-date information and also using the professional information services such as the experts generated information contents and the Google Scholar type document reference information services instead of the Library 2.0 services based on the Web 2.0 technologies.

keywords
라이브러리 2.0, 이용자 연구, 도서관 서비스, 웹2.0, Library 2.0, User Study, Library Services, Web 2.0

Reference

1.

김기영, (2007) Library 2.0: 개념과 논점, 정보관리강좌 2007

2.

이재윤, (2006) 디지털도서관 기술 동향: Library 2.0과 이용자 생성 메타데이터. 대학도서관 실무자 세미나 2006, 한국교육학술정보원

3.

이지연, (2006) 산?학?연 과학기술 정보자원 이용행태 및 니즈 연구, 한국과학기술정보원

4.

Arko, R.A., Ginger, K.M., Kastens, K.A. and J. Weatherley, “Using annotations to add value to a digital library for education." D-Lib Magazine, 2,

5.

Casey, Michael, “Librarians Without Borders.” In Library Crunch. 26 Septem- ber 2005,

6.

Casey, Michael. and Savastinuk, Laura, “Library 2.0: Service for the next- generation library." In Library Journal. 1 September 2006,

7.

Casey, Michael. and Savastinuk, Laura, “We Know What Library 2.0 Is and Is Not.” In Library Crunch. 31 October 2007,

8.

Chabot, Steven, “Empirical Research and Library 2.0." In Subject/Object. 31 October 2007,

9.

Crawford, Walt, “Library 2.0 and Library 2.0'.” Cites & Insights, 6(2): 1-32,

10.

Maness, M. Jack, “Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Li- braries." Webology, 3(2),

11.

Notess, R. Greg, “The terrible twos: web 2.0, library 2.0, and more." Online, 30(3): 40-42,

12.

Regazzi, J. John, “The battle for mind- share: A battle beyond access and ret- rieval(miles conrad memorial lecture)." In 46th NFAIS Annual Conference. February 2004,

13.

Streefkerk, Marco, Listen to the users…: Use, user survey and usability testing with the digital library in Ams- terdam,

14.

이성숙, 학술연구정보서시스(RISS)의 발전방안 연구. 『한국도서관?정보학회지』, 37(3): 103-129. Bookjetty,

15.

미국 의회도서관 플릭커 서비스,

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy