바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on Developing the Evaluation Indicators for Academic Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2008, v.42 no.2, pp.147-170




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Evaluation of an academic library is a key to its success. Library and Information Policy Bureau of the President of the Republic of Korea conducted a trial evaluation on academic libraries with a university evaluation index developed by KERIS in 2005. The committee decided to review its feasibility based on the feedbacks from the academic libraries after the trial. This study aims to address the indexing issues appeared during the trial and suggest a new evaluation index tailored to academic libraries. First, the evaluation field is condensed from 7 to 6 as “financing” and “infrastructure” are integrated into “budget and infrastructure.” Secondly, both “user charter” and “planning” are removed from the “library management” field category, and “library self-assessment” is added instead. In “information resource” field, “non-books and etc.” is added. Third, evaluation categories for “budget and infrastructure” field are altered to budget-related items and library equipment. Forth, “collection turnover rate” category is incorporated into “collection usage” in “information usage” field, and “library use rate” in “information service” field is moved to “information resource” field and renamed as “use rate.”

keywords
Academic Library, Evaluation Indicators, 대학도서관, 평가지표

Reference

1.

곽병희 ; 이두영, (2002) 디지털 환경에서 대학도서관 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구, 정보관리학회지

2.

교육인적자원부, (2003) 2003년도 대학평가 및 재정지원 기본 계획, 동 자원부

3.

국공립대학도서관협의회, (2004) 국립대학도서관보, 동 협의회

4.

國立大學圖書館協議會 自己評價基準檢討委員會, (1993) 國立大學圖書館における自己點檢?評價についてよりよき實施に向けて提言, 大學圖書館硏究

5.

김진수, (1995) 대학종합평가인정제의 실제와 도서관평가문제, 圖書館文化

6.

도서관정보정책위원회, (2007) 도서관 운영 평가연구 시범사업 결과보고서, 동 위원회

7.

李炳穆 , (1992) 美國 大學校圖書館을 위한 基準; 成果 評價를 中心으로, 國會圖書館報

8.

백항기, (1995) 대학도서관 평가제도의 문제점과 개선방안, 圖書館文化

9.

私立大學校圖書館協會, (1999) 自己點檢?評價手法ガイドライン, 同協會 自己點檢?評價手法ガイドライン 作成委員會

10.

서혜란, (1996) 대학종합평가인정제 실시에 따른 대학도서관의 평가에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

11.

서혜란, (2004) 미국의 대학평가인정기준에 나타나는 대학도서관 평가기준의 최근 경향, 한국비블리아

12.

윤희윤, (2001) 대학도서관 평가지표의 다의성과 지향성, 한국도서관정보학회지

13.

윤희윤, (2001) 국내 대학도서관의 평가모형 개발에 관한 연구, 한국도서관정보학회지

14.

한국교육학술정보원, (2005) 대학도서관 평가제도 개선 방안에 관한 연구, 동 정보원

15.

장혜란, (1997) 대학도서관 질적 평가를 위한 모형 개발, 한국문헌정보학회지

16.

丁 一, (1996) 大學圖書館 評價에 대한 小考, 國立大學圖書館報

17.

조재인, (2003) 학술정보 공유 활성화를 위한 대학도서관 평가 방안, 한국도서관정보학회지

18.

중앙일보, (2002) 전국대학평가, 중앙일보

19.

최정태, (1994) 1994년도 대학종합자체평가에 나타난 ‘도서관 영역' 비교연구: 부산대학교 외 6개 대학도서관을 중심으로, 圖書館學論集

20.

최정태, (1997) 국?공립대학도서관 비교평가연구: 전국 46개 4년제 대학도서관을 중심으로, 도서관학논집

21.

한국대학교육협의회, (2004) 대학 종합평가 편람, 동 협의회

22.

한국도서관협회, (2000) 대학도서관 평가기준 개발 연구, 동 협회

23.

한국도서관협회, (2001) 대학도서관평가기준, 동 협회

24.

한국도서관협회, (2004) 한국도서관통계, 동 협회

25.

ACRL, Task Force on Academic Library Outcomes Assessment,-104-Report,

26.

ACRL, Standards for College Libraries 2000 Edition,

27.

ARL, (2008) ARL Statistics 2005-06, Association of Research Libraries

28.

Association of College and Research Libraries, Standard for College Libraries 2000 Edition,

29.

Baker,Ronald L, (2002) Evaluating Quality and Effectiveness: Regional Accreditation Principles and Practices, Journal of Academic Librarianship

30.

Brophy, P, (1997) Mana- gement Information System and Perfor- mance Measurement for the Electronic Library: eLib Supporting Study(MIEL2) Final Report, Univ. of Central Lancashire

31.

Brophy, P, EQUINOX: Library Performance Measurement and Quality Management System: Performance Indi- cators for Electronic Library Services,

32.

Ebbinghouse,C, (1999) Library Standards: Evidence of Library Effectiveness and Accreditation, Search

33.

Hernon, P, (2002) An Action Plan for Outcomes Assessment in Your Library, American Library Association

34.

International Organization for Standardization, (1998) ISO 11620: - 105 - Information and Documentation - Library Performation Indicators, ISO

35.

International Organization for Standardization, (2003) ISO/TR 20983: Information and Documentation - Performance Indicators for electronic library service, ISO

36.

McClure, Charles R, (1996) Assessing the Academic Net- worked Environment: Strategies and Options, Coalition for Networked Information

37.

NCES, Coverage Evaluation of the Academic Library Survey: Technical Report. U. S. Department of Education,

38.

Nelson, W, (2002) Standards and Assessment for Academic Libraries: a Workbook, ACRL

39.

Poll, Roswitha, (1996) Measuring Quality: International Gui- deline for Performance Measurement in Academic Libraries, K. G. Saur.

40.

Pritchard,Sarah M, (1996) Determining Quality in Academic Libraries, Library Trends

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science