바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.42 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Development of Enjoyment Indicators of Public Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2008, v.42 no.4, pp.329-354


& (2008). A Study on the Development of Enjoyment Indicators of Public Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 329-354.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop the indicators for measuring enjoyment of public libraries by the community. The term, enjoyment is defined as the community members' use and appreciation. Four types of enjoyment indicators are constructed through literature review: basic(environment), state(use), result(outcome), and essential(to enhance enjoyment). The prepared enjoyment indicators are evaluated and selected by focus groups interviews of professionals(researchers, librarians and policy makers). Those selected indicators are tested and revised through a internet survey of 508 Kyungi residents. Based on the analysis of the results this study suggests a total of 46 enjoyment indicators.

keywords
Public Library, Evaluation, Outcome, Measurement, Enjoyment, 공공도서관, 이용결과, 향유지표, 결과측정, Public Library, Evaluation, Outcome, Measurement, Enjoyment

Reference

1.

대한민국정부, (2007) 도서관법,

2.

문화관광부, (2006) 문화지표체계 개선:2005 문화지표,

3.

문화관광부, (2006) 문화향수실태조사,

4.

오세탁, (1983) 文化財保護法硏究:文化財享有權의 法理를 中心으로,

5.

이소희 ; 김민정, (2000) 청소년 문화복지지표체계개발 연구, 청소년복지연구

6.

이용남, (1992) 公共圖書館 目的의 構造에 관한 硏究, 한국문헌정보학회지

7.

차미경, (2003) 공공도서관의 지역사회에 대한 영향력 평가 지표 개발에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

8.

표순희 ; 정동열, (2008) 공공도서관 경제적 이용가치 측정방안에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

9.

한국도서관협회, (2003) 한국도서관 기준, 한국도서관협회

10.

Barron, Daniel D, The economic impact of public libraries on South Carolina. The School of Library and Information Secience. University of South Carolina,

11.

Fitch, Lesile, (1998) Divid- ends: the value of public libraries in Canada, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances

12.

Griffits, Jose-Marie, Donald W. King, and Thomas Lynch, Taxpayer Return on Investment in Florida Public Li- braries: Summary Report. Florida: State Library and Archives of Floridas,

13.

Institute of Public Finance and European Commission, Survey Question- naires and Notes of Guidance,

14.

Kerslake, Evelyn, (1998) Public libraries, public interest and the information society: theoretical issues and the social impact of public libraries, Journal of Librarianship and Informa- tion Science

15.

LISU, LISU Annual Library Statistics 2006,

16.

NISO Standards Committee AY: Library Statistics, Survey Detail: Public Libraries Survey,

17.

Markless, Sharon, (2006) Evaluating the impact of your library, Facet Publishing

18.

Matthews,Joseph R, (2006) Measuring for results: the dimensions of public library effectiveness, Libraries Un- limited

19.

Morrill, Joshua H, The Wisconsin Li- brary User(and Non-User) II: Outcomes of a second Statewide Survey(2003- 2007 comparisons),

20.

Poll,Roswitha, (2003) Measuring impact and outcome of libraries, Performance Meas- urement and Metrics

21.

Wavell, Caroline, Graeme Baxter, Ian Johnson, and Dorothy Williams, Impact evaluation of museums, archives and libraries: available evidence project,

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy