바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study of Ways to Improve Periodical Indexing Services in Korea

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2009, v.43 no.1, pp.189-214
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.1.189




Abstract

The study acknowledges the values of periodical indexing as information resources. The study identified periodicals users' needs of article indexing services based on focus group interviews. The study also conducted a comparative study of periodicals indexing services of libraries and databases in Korea and the US. The study argues for the need of seamless services for users of periodical articles indexing services. The study also recommends the elements needed for improving the current service, which includes establishing a collaborative indexing system, adopting a metadata standard, implementing authority files, incorporating social web services, offering diverse ways of information discovery based on facet approach, and stabilizing identification systems.

keywords
정기간행물, 기사색인, 포커스 그룹 인터뷰, Periodicals, Article Indexing, Focus Group Interviews, Periodicals, Article Indexing, Focus Group Interviews

Reference

1.

고영만. 2002. ꡔ전문정보 통합센터로서의 국회도서관ꡕ. 국회도서관 50년사, 서울: 국회도서관, 377-385.

2.

오삼균. 2002. 시멘틱웹 기술과 활용방안. 정보관리학회지 , 19(4): 297-319.

3.

윤구호. 2001. ꡔ색인․초록ꡕ. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

4.

윤정옥. 2003. 연속간행물 종합목록 데이터베이스의 레코드 품질평가. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 37(1): 27-42.

5.

하우정. 2001. ꡔH.W. Wilson사 색인의 변천과 발전에 관한 연구ꡕ. 계명대학교 석사학위논문. 대구: 계명대학교.

6.

한종엽. 2000. ꡔ연속간행물 기사DB의 서지데이터요소 표준화연구ꡕ. 중앙대 박사학위논문. 서울: 중앙대학교.

7.

COI 핸드북: 문화콘텐츠 식별체계 사업. 2006. 한국문화콘텐츠진흥원.<http://211.219.178.4:8000/lib/File/06-08.pdf>.

8.

Anderson, R. 2008. “Future-Proofing the Library: Strategies for Acquisitions, Cataloging, and Collection Development.” The Serials Librarian, 55(4): 560-567.

9.

Connaway, L. S. 2007. “Mountains, Valleys and Pathways: Serials Users' Needs and Steps to Meet Them-Part 1." The Serials Librarian, 52(1/2): 223-236.

10.

Litteltree, S. 2008. Endeca Catalog Usability Test. <http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/endeca/publications/catalog-usability-report-feb2008.doc>.

11.

Nisogner, E. 2008. “The 80/20 Rule and Core Journals.” The Serials Librarian, 55(1/2): 62-84.

12.

Scherlen, A., 2004. “Courage of Our Convictions: Making Difficult Decisions About Serials Collections." Serials Review, 30(2): 117-121.

13.

Kemp, R. 2008. “Catalog/Cataloging Changes and Web 2.0 Functionality: New Directions for Serials." The Serials Librarian, 53(4): 91-112.

14.

Porter, J. 2008. ꡔDesining for the social webꡕ. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

15.

Reynolds, R. R. 2007. “Mountains, Valleys and Pathways: Serials Users' Needs and Steps to Meet Them-Part 2." The Serials Librarian, 52(1/2): 237-249.

16.

Santos, A. 2008. Clustering and Faceted Search. <http://tagus.inesc-id.pt/~pcalado/ri0809/seminarios/AndreSantos_facetedSearch.pdf>.

17.

Spiteri, L. F. 2009. “The Impact of Social Cataloging Sites on the Construction of Bibliographic Records in the Public Library Catalog." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47: 52-73.

18.

Stephens, D., Lott, C., and Weston, B. 2001. “Prioritizing Periodicals: A Web-based Approach to Gathering Faculty Advice on Journal Subscriptions." The Serials Librarian, 40(3/4): 369-373.

19.

Yee, K-P., Swearingen, K., Li, K., and Hearst, M. 2003. “Faceted Metadata for Image Search and Browsing." Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 401-408. <http://flamenco.berkeley.edu/papers/flamenco-chi03.pdf>.

20.

OCLC Success Story: University of Washington Libraries. <http://www.oclc.org/services/brochures/213050usc_uwashington.pdf>.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science