-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
방송기획과정 분석을 통한 방송콘텐츠 창작자의 정보활동모형 개발에 관한 연구
A Study on the Development of the Broadcast Content Creators' Information Behavior Model through Analysis of the Planning Process
초록
본 연구는 인지적, 정서적, 환경적 측면을 포함한 통합적 관점에서 방송콘텐츠 창작자들이 방송기획과정에서 정보를 이용하는 과정을 분석하여 정보활동모형을 개발하였다. 방송콘텐츠 창작자들은 공통된 인지적 프로세스 단계를 통해 정보의 교환과 통합을 이루며, 대중과의 정서적 공감을 위하여 최근의 뉴스와 인간 및 일상생활전반에 대한 정보를 끊임없이 탐색한다. 또한 정보의 시대성과 시의성, 방송사회내의 규범과 문화적 맥락도 중요한 정보원이며 정보에 대한 판단은 주관적이며 경험적으로 이루어지고 있음을 밝혀내었다.
- keywords
- 방송창작자 정보활동모형, 방송콘텐츠 창작자, 방송기획, 정보이용, 정보이용모형, Broadcasting Content Creators' Information Behavior Model, Broadcasting Content Creator, Broadcasting Planning Process, Information Behavior, Human Information Behavior, Broadcasting Content Creators' Information Behavior Model, Broadcasting Content Creator, Broadcasting Planning Process, Information Behavior, Human Information Behavior
Abstract
This study is aimed at developing a broadcast content creators' information behavior model through analysis of the process of information use including an integrated perspective such as cognitive, emotional and environmental aspects. Broadcast content creators have a common cognitive process and pools of information exchange and integration. In order to have emotional empathy with the general public they search and use the news and human and everyday life information seeking (ELIS). The most important thing is the context of social norms and culture in the broadcasting community and information about judgment is subjective and empirical.
- keywords
- 방송창작자 정보활동모형, 방송콘텐츠 창작자, 방송기획, 정보이용, 정보이용모형, Broadcasting Content Creators' Information Behavior Model, Broadcasting Content Creator, Broadcasting Planning Process, Information Behavior, Human Information Behavior, Broadcasting Content Creators' Information Behavior Model, Broadcasting Content Creator, Broadcasting Planning Process, Information Behavior, Human Information Behavior
참고문헌
김영천, 김진희. 질적연구방법론: Software and Qualitative Analysis. 2005. 서울: 아카데미프레스.
설진아. 2007. ꡔ방송기획제작의 기초ꡕ. 개정판. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
이정연. 2008. 영화창작자의 정보활동모형 설계에 관한 질적 연구. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 42(4): 417-439.
ASIST. 2005. Theories of Information Behavior. Karen E. Fisher, Sanda Erdelez and Lynne Mckechinie.(Eds), ASIST Monograph Series. Information Today.
Back, Jonathan and Charles Oppenheim. “A Model of cognitive load for IR: implications for user relevance feedback interaction." Information Research, January. 6(2). [online]. [cited 2009.3.10]. <http://InformationR.net/ir/6-2/ws2.html>.
Bilal, Dania. “Children's use of the Yahooligans! web search engine: I. cognitive, physical and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(7): 646-665.
Case, Donald. 2002. ꡔ정보추구행태론ꡕ. 사공복희, 윤정옥 공역. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
Choo, C. 1998. The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning. create knowledge, and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cobbledick, S. 1996. “The Information seeking behavior of artists: Exploratory interviews." Library Quarterly, 66: 343-372.
Dervin, B. 1983. “Information as a user construct: The relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation." In: S. A. Ward, and L. J. Reed(Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation: 153-184. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Dervin, B. 1997. “Given an context by any other name: Methodological tools for taming the unruly beast." In P. Vakkari, R. Savolaine, and B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context: Proceedings of a meeting in Finland. London: Taylor Graham.
Hemming, W. S. 2008. “The information seeking behavior of visual artists: a literature review." Journal of Documentation, 64(3): 343-362.
Martyn, J. 1974. “Information needs and uses." In M. Williams(Ed). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 9: 3-23. Washington, DC: American Society for Information Science.
Nahl, Diane. 1996. “Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(4): 276-286.
Nahl, Diane. 2004. “Measuring the affective information environment of web searchers." Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 41: 191-197.
Nahl, Diane. 2006. “Affective and cognitive information behavior: Interaction effects in internet use." Proceedings of the 68th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 42: 181-195.
Nahl, Diane. 2007. “Social-biological information technology: An integrated conceptual framework." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2021-2046.
Norman, D. A. 1981. “Twelve issues for cognitive science." In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Perspectives on cognitive science, 265-295. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum/Basic Books.
QSR Nvivo8. [online]. [cited 2009.5.30].<http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx>.
Savolainen, Reijo. 2009. Small world and information grounds as context of information seeking and sharing. Library and Information Science Research, 31: 38-45.
Savolainen, Reijo. 2008. “Information use and information processing: Comparison of conceptualizations." Journal of Documentation, 65(2): 187-207.
Savolainen, Reijo. 2006. “Information use and Gap-Bridging: The viewpoint of sensemaking methodology." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8): 1116-1145.
Spink, A, and Charles Cole. 2006. “Human Information Behavior: Integrating diverse approaches and Information use." Journal of the American Society for Information Scienceand Technology, 57(1): 25-35.
Taylor, R. S, 1991. “Information use environments." In B. Dervin & M. Voigt(Eds.). Progress in communication sciences(vol 10). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Visick, R., Jody H., and Carolyn B. 2006. “Seeking information during the creative process: a pilot study of artists." [online]. [cited 2009.10.1].<http://staff.washington.edu/jath/portfolio/570final.pdf>.
Wilson, T.D. 1999. “Models in information behavior research." Journal of Documentation,55(3): 249-270.
Wilson, T.D. 2000. “Human information behavior." Informing Science, 3(2): 49-55.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수