바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Library of Congress’s Subject Headings as an Information Access Point

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.2, pp.51-72
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.2.051

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore usefulness of the Library of Congress Subject Headings(LCSH) for librarians as an information access point. Sixty four librarians at the University of Washington(UW) and 67 librarians from the Council on East Asian Libraries(CEAL) participated through web surveys about LCSH and 9 librarians from UW and 10 librarians from CEAL joined in-depth interviews and e-mail correspondences. It was concluded that LCSH was very useful for finding other related materials as a subject access point. However, there were two necessary improvements recommended for the LCSH. First of all, in aspect of terminology, subject headings should be more familiar to the public with currency and show clear definitions and relationships. Second, with regard to the structure of LCSH, it should have simplicity, ease of use, and consistency when using combinations of subject headings. Since many other countries are using or adapting LCSH, its effect can be very strong. Therefore, the meaning of “Tok Island (Korea)” in LCSH is very important. It was found that the total number of results in a Google search, which includes the total number of publications in the world, diplomatic and research activities relating to “Tok Island(Korea)” were important factors for listing in LCSH as authorized subject headings. So there should be a great deal of efforts in studying and publishing materials related “Tok Island(Korea)” as well as diplomatic and scholarly efforts with sensing movements of other countries.

keywords
Subject Heading, Library of Congress Subject Headings, LCSH, Access Points, Subject Access, Tok Island(Korea), Subject Heading, Library of Congress Subject Headings, LCSH, Access Points, Subject Access, Tok Island(Korea), 주제명표목, 미국의회도서관 주제명 표목, 접근점, 주제 접근, 독도

Reference

1.

김영귀. 1997. LC Subject Heading에 나타난 한국관련 주제명의 선정 및 표기에 관한 연구. ꡔ부산여자대학교 논문집(인문사회과학대학편)ꡕ, 44(1): 237-272.

2.

김주성, 김태수. 1995. LC주제명표목표와 시소러스의 색인어 구조 비교연구. ꡔ한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집ꡕ, 2: 111-114.

3.

김정현, 문지현. 2009. LCSH 한국관련 주제명표목의 변천과정에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 40(3): 49-68.

4.

김태수. 1997. 주제명표목의 구조에 관한 연구. ꡔ정보관리학회지ꡕ, 14(1): 77-105.

5.

남태우, 전말숙, 정연순, 장로사. 2008. 자료조직 측면에서 독도표기 문제에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 42(4): 291-310.

6.

사공철 외. 1996. ꡔ문헌정보학용어사전ꡕ. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

7.

유영준. 2009. 신학학술지의 색인어에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 40(3): 137-156.

8.

윤정옥. 2001. 미국의회도서관 주제명표목표(LCSH)의 한국과 일본 관련 주제표목의 비교 연구. ꡔ도서관ꡕ, 56(1): 30-55.

9.

윤혜영. 2003. LC Subject Headings 색인어 구조 분석. ꡔ인문사회과학논문집(중부대학교)ꡕ, 7(2): 133-149.

10.

전창호. 2004. DDC에서의 한국, 조선 및 동해의 표기 문제. ꡔ도서관문화ꡕ, 45(9): 68-73.

11.

최달현, 이창수. 2005. ꡔ정보자료의 분류와 주제명ꡕ. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

12.

한상완, 김태수, 최석두, 이은철, 남태우. 1995. 주제명 검색요어집 개발에 관한 연구. ꡔ도서관ꡕ, 50(1): 3-23.

13.

황면, 이재선, 한정원, 한인선, 류희경, 송지혜, 김승정. 2002. 시소러스를 도입한 주제명표목표에 관한 연구. ꡔ도서관연구회논문집ꡕ, 2002년: 123-138.

14.

Anderson, James, and Hofmann, Melissa. 2006. “A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1): 7-38.

15.

Antell, Karen, and Huang, Jie. 2008. “Subject searching success: transaction logs, patron perceptions, and implications for library instruction.” Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(1): 68-76.

16.

Calhoun, Karen, Cantrell, Joanne, Gallaghter, Peggy, and Hawk, Janet. 2009. Online catalogs: what users and librarians want: an OCLC report. Dublin, OH: OCLC.

17.

Carlyle, A. “Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 10(1989): 37-63.

18.

Chan, Lois Mai. 2005. Library of Congress Subject Headings: principles and application. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

19.

Chan, Lois Mai, and Hodges, Thedora. 2000. “Entering the millennium: a new century for LCSH.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1): 225-234.

20.

Frost, Carolyn O. 1985. “Student and faculty subject searching in a university online public catalog” [online]. [cited 2010.1.5]. <http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED264872>.

21.

Drabenstott, Karen Markey, and Vizine-Goetz, Diane. 1994. Using subject headings for online retrieval: theory, practice, and potential. San Diego: Academic Press.

22.

Drabenstott, Karen Markey, Simcox, Schelle, and Fenton. Eileen G. 1999. “End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs.” Library Resources & Technical Services, 43(3): 140-160.

23.

Fernandez, Cheryl Wise. 1991. “Semantic relationships between title phrases and LCSH.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 13(1): 51-77.

24.

Fischer, Karen. 2005. “Critical view of LCSH, 1990-2001: the third bibliographic essay.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 41(1): 63-109.

25.

Garrett, J. 2007. “Subject headings in full-text environments: the ECCO experiment.” College & Research Libraries, 68(1): 69-81.

26.

National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. GNS Search. [online]. [cited 2010.1.14]. <http://geonames.nga.mil/ggmagaz/gnsquicksearch.asp>.

27.

Haykin, David Judson. 1951. Subject headings: a practical guide. Washington, D. C.: GPO.

28.

Heiner-Freiling, Magda. 2000. “Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1-2): 189-198.

29.

Library of Congress. Library of Congress authorities. [online]. [cited 2010.1.12]. <http://authorities.loc.gov/>.

30.

Library of Congress CDS(Cataloging Distribution Service). Tools for authority: subject headings. [online]. [cited 2010.1.11]. <http://www.loc.gov/cds/lcsh.html#lcsh20>.

31.

Mann, Thomas. 2000. “Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1): 117-126.

32.

Marshall, Linnea. 2003. “Specific and generic subject headings: increasing subject access to library materials.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 36(2): 59-87.

33.

SACO. LCSH Tentative list. [online]. [cited 2010.1.11]. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/tentative/twls0829.html>.

34.

Shubert, Steven Blake. 1992. “Critical views of LCSH - ten years later.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 15(2): 37-97.

35.

Taylor, Arlene G. 2004. The organization of information. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.

36.

Taylor, Arlene G. 2006. Introduction to cataloging and classification. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.

37.

Vizine-Goetz, Diane, and Drabenstott, Karen Markey. 1991. “Computer and manual analysis of subject terms entered by online catalog users.” Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 28: 156-161.

38.

Wool, Gregory. 2000. “Filing and precoordination: how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1-2): 91-106.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science