바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.44 No.3
Citation Share

A Study on Book Metadata Creation and Distribution on Supply Chain

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.3, pp.61-80
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.061

(2010). A Study on Book Metadata Creation and Distribution on Supply Chain. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(3), 61-80, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.061
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Recently, the publishing community now recognizes the importance of metadata in customers’ buying decisions. As a result, they are more interested in effective metadata creation and quality maintenance, as well as standardization of exchanging system in the supply chain. As the library community also investigates the economic effectiveness of creating metadata, they try to find the best model for simplifying metadata creation by using sources close to the original. This study analyzes metadata work flow which had same source but be used in different fields by their own type and standard. It also discusses the same issues about each section and possibility about interoperation. Finally this paper tries to find an effective creation and distribution model of book metadata which can be used in domestic publishing and the library community.

keywords
출판 공급사슬, 도서메타데이터, ONIX, MARC, CIP, ONIX, MARC, CIP

Reference

1.

김선애. 2009. 우리나라 CIP 프로그램에 관한 고찰. ꡔ제46회 전국도서관대회 세미나 3: 공공도서관목록, 빠르고 정확하게ꡕ. [online]. [cited 2009. 12. 1]. <http://conference.kla.kr/>.

2.

장지숙. 2009. 공공도서관 목록 품질향상을 위한 방안: CIP를 중심으로. ꡔ제46회 전국도서관대회세미나 3: 공공도서관목록, 빠르고 정확하게ꡕ. [online]. [cited 2009. 12. 1]. <http://conference.kla.kr>.

3.

한국출판유통진흥원. 2006. KORMARC ↔ ONIX 변환표. [online]. [cited 2009. 10. 1]. <http://www.booktrade.or.kr/new_notice/att_file/KORMARC_ONIX_CHANGE_NEW.pdf>.

4.

国立国会図書館, 2007, デューイ十進分類法を採用しない図書館，議論の的に, カレントアウェアネス-E No.111. [online]. [cited 2009. 10. 1]. <http://www.current.ndl.go.jp/e677>.

5.

A Symposium for Publishers and Librarians. [online]. [cited]. <http://www.oclc.org/publisher-symposium/>.

6.

BISAC. [online]. [cited]. <http://www.bisg.org/>.

7.

EDItEUR. [online]. [cited]. <http://www.editeur.org/>.

8.

Godby, & Carol Jean. 2010. “Mapping ONIX to MARC." [online]. [cited 2010. 4. 10]. <http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-14.pdf>.

9.

ISNI. [online]. [cited]. <www.isni.org/>.

10.

ISTC. [online]. [cited]. <http://www.istc-international.org/>.

11.

Mitchell, Joan S. 2010. “BISAC-DDC Mappings. ALA Midwinter Meeting Boston January 16, 2010." [online]. [cited 2010. 3. 1]. <www.oclc.org/dewey/news/conferences/bisac.ppt>.

12.

MARC Advisory Committee. 2010. “MARC DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2010-DP03." [online]. [cited 2010. 3. 10]. <http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2010/2010-dp03.html>.

13.

NISO, & OCLC. 2009. “Streamlining Book Metadata Workflow." [online]. [cited 2009. 12. 1]. <http://www.niso.org/publications/white_papers/StreamlineBookMetadataWorkflowWhitePaper.pdf>.

14.

Oder, & Norman. 2007. “Behind the Maricopa County Library District’s Dewey-less Plan, Library Journal, 5/31/2007." [onine]. [cited 2009. 10. 1]. <http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6448055.html>.

15.

OCLC. 2009a. “Report on OCLC's Symposium for Publishers and Libraries." [online]. [cited 2010. 3. 3]. <http://www.oclc.org/publisher-symposium/summary/default.htm>.

16.

OCLC. 2009b. “From ONIX to MARC and Back Again: New Frontiers in Metadata Creation at OCLC, ALA Midwinter January 25, 2009." [online]. [cited 2010. 3. 13]. <http://www.oclc.org/us/en/multimedia/2009/files/ONIX_to_MARC.ppt>.

17.

R2 Consulting LLC. 2009. “Study of the North American MARC Records Marketplace." [online]. [cited 2009. 12. 30]. <http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/MARC_Record_Marketplace_2009-10.pdf>.

18.

Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. 2008. “On the Record: Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control." [online]. [cited 2009. 11. 1]. <http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf>.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy