바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Impact of an Academic Library on its Users

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2011, v.45 no.3, pp.163-186
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.3.163




Abstract

University library evaluations have previously put emphasis on how many collections a library has, what kinds of services it offers, and how satisfied its users are with the services. But these evaluations are not enough to show how much impact university libraries have on their stakeholders and how they can contribute to the mission and purpose of the parent organization. This study is a starting point of discussion for the impact and value measurement of university libraries. The aim is to identify a university library’s impact in terms of various stakeholders and accordingly determine its measuring element. The impact of a university library on students can be measured by the students’ study, success and accomplishments. The impact on professors can be measured through the success of their teaching and research productivity. Finally, the impact on a university can be realized by understanding how a library affects university’s reputation and success.

keywords
대학도서관, 결과, 영향력, 가치, 도서관서비스, Academic Library, Outcome, Impact, Value, Library Service, Academic Library, Outcome, Impact, Value, Library Service

Reference

1.

김선애. 2008. 대학도서관의 이용자만족도와 충성도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 42(3):281-299.

2.

서혜란. 2004. 미국의 대학평가인정기준에 나타나는 대학도서관 평가기준의 최근 경향. 한국비블리아학회지 , 15(2): 255-270.

3.

신정철, 정지선, 신택수. 2008. 대학생의 학업성취도와 그 영향요인들 간의 인과관계 분석. 교육행정연구 , 26(1): 287-313.

4.

최정윤, 이병식. 2009. 대학생의 학습성과에 대한 영향 요인 탐색: 대학의 효과분석을 중심으로. 교육행정연구 , 27(1): 199-222.

5.

표순희, 정동열. 2008. 공공도서관의 경제적 이용가치 측정 방안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 ,42(2): 219-234.

6.

Aabø, Svanhild, & Strand, Jon. 2004. “Public library valuation, nonuse values, and altruisticmotivations." Library and Information Science Research, 26(3): 351-372.

7.

ACRL. 2010. Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report.Researched by Megan Oakleaf. Chicago: ACRL. [online]. [cited 2011.7.5].<http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/issues/value/val_report.pdf>.

8.

Astin, Alexander. 1985. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Prioritiesand Practices in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Quoted in Matthews, JosephR. Measuring for Results: The Dimensions of Public Library Effectiveness. Westport: LibrariesUnlimited, 2004.

9.

Botha, Erika, Erasmus, Rene, & Van Deventer, Martie. 2009. “Evaluating the impact of aspecial library and information service.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,41(2): 108-123.

10.

Brophy, Peter. 2006. Measuring Library Performance: Principles and Techniques. London:Facet Publishing.

11.

Budd, John M. 1995. “Faculty publishing productivity: An institutional analysis and comparisonwith library and other measures.” College & Research Libraries, Nov.: 547-554.

12.

Cluff, E. Dale, & Murrah, David J. 1987. “The influence of library resources on facultyrecruitment and retention.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 13(1): 19-23.

13.

Debono, Barbara. 2002. “Assessing the social impact of public libraries: What the literatureis saying." Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 15(2): 80-95.

14.

Donovan, J. M. 1996. “Do librarians deserve tenure? Casting an anthropological eye on roledefinition within the law school." Law Library Journal, 88(3): 382-401.

15.

Elliott, Donald S., Holt, Glen E., Hayden, Sterling W., & Holt, Leslie Edmonds. 2007. MeasuringYour Library's Value. Chicago: American Library Association.

16.

Frazier, L. M. 1993. Deteriorating School Facilities and Student Learning. Washington, D.C.:Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

17.

Fitch, Lesile, & Warner, Jody. 1998. “Dividends: The value of public libraries in Canada."The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 11(4): 158-179.

18.

Greer, Jeff. 2010. “4 reasons why the library should affect your college choice: The library is a home away from home for a lot students, son get to know what it can do for you.” U.S. News & World Report, 17 June. [online]. [cited 2007.4.4]. <http://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/right-school/choices/articles/2010/06/1 7/4-reasons-why-the-library-affects-your-college-choice>.

19.

Horton, Sarah, & Spence, Jaqueline. 2006. Scoping the Economic and Social Impact of Archives.Yorkshire: Museums Libraries Archives. [online]. [cited 2007.4.4].<http://www.mla.gov.uk/resources/assets//S/Scoping_theEconomic_and_Social_Impact_of_Archives_Report_9739.pdf>.

20.

Jager, Karin de. 2002. “Successful students: Does the library make a different?” PerformanceMeasurement and Metrics, 3(3): 140-144.

21.

Kelly, Ursula, McNicoll, Iain, & Brooks, Richard. 2008. Towards the Estimation of the EconomicValue of the Outputs of Scottish HEIs: Next Steps Project Report to the Scottish FundingCouncil, Summary. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. [online]. [cited 2011.7.2].<http://ewds.strath.ac.uk/Portals/8/Summary1509.pdf>.

22.

Kerslake, Evelyn, & Kinneli, Margaret. 1998. “Public libraries, public interest and the informationsociety: Theoretical issues and the social impact of public libraries." Journal of Librarianshipand Information Science, 30(3): 159-167.

23.

Kuh, George D., Crucwae, Ty M., Shoup, Rick, Kinzie, Jillian, & Gonyea, Robert M. 2008.“Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence.”Journal of Higher Education, 79(5): 540-563.

24.

Liu, Lewis Guodo. 2001. “The contribution of library collections to prestige of academic programsof universities: A quantitative analysis." Library Collections, Acquisitions & TechnologyServices, 25: 49-65.

25.

Luther, Judy. 2008. University Investment in the Library: What’s the Return? A CaseStudy at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. [online].[cited 2011.6.24]. <http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/whitepapers/lcwp0101.pdf>.

26.

Marshall, Joanne Gard. 2007. “Measuring the value and impact of heath library and informationservices: Past reflections, future possibilities." Health Information and Libraries Journal,24(Suppl. 1): 4-17.

27.

Matthews, Joseph R. 2007. Library Assessment in Higher Education. London: LibrariesUnlimited.

28.

Matthews, Joseph R. 2004. Measuring for Results: The Dimensions of Public LibraryEffectiveness. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

29.

Melo, Luiza Baptista, & Pires, Cesaltina Pacheco. 2011. “Measuring the economic value ofthe electronic scientific information services in Portuguese academic libraries." Journal ofLibrarianship and Information Science, 43(2): 1-11.

30.

Mezick, Elizabeth M. 2007. “Return on investment: Libraries and student retention.” TheJournal of Academic Librarianship, 33(5): 561-566.

31.

Michael, Steve O. 2005. “The cost of excellence: The financial implications of institutionalrankings." International Journal of Educational Management, 19(5): 365-382.

32.

Munde, Gail, & Marks, Kenneth. 2009. Surviving the Future: Academic Libraries, Quality,and Assessment. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

33.

Oakleaf, Megan. 2010. “Are they learning? Are we? Learning outcomes & the academiclibrary.” Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment:Complication of Keynote Presentation, 25-27 October, 2010. [Baltimore]. [online]. [cited2011.6.22]. <http://libraryassessment.org/schedule/index.shtml#LACA>.

34.

Poll, Roswitha. 2003. “Measuring impact and outcome of libraries." Performance Measurementand Metrics, 4(1): 5-12.

35.

Poll, Roswitha, & Payne, Philip. 2006. Impact Measures for Libraries and Information Services.London: Birkbeck ePrints. [online]. [cited 2011.6.22].<http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/archive/00000373>.

36.

Simmel, Leslie. 2007. “Building your value story and business case." C&RL News, 68(2):88-91.

37.

State Universities of Michigan. 2002. The Economic Impact of Michigan's Public Universities.[online]. [cited 2011.6.22].<http://tbed.org/wp-content/uploads/Michiganunivimpactreport.pdf>.

38.

The University of South Dakota. 2010. The Economic Impact of the South Dakota PublicUniversity System. [online]. [cited 2011.7.5].<http://www.sdbor.edu/mediapubs/documents/BOREconomicImpactReport.pdf>.

39.

Tenopir, Carol. 2010. University Investment in the Library, Phase II: An International Surveyof the Library's Value to the Grants Process. Elsevier White Paper. [online]. [cited 2011.6.5].<http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/.../2010-06-whitepaper-roi2.pdf>.

40.

Wavell, Caroline, Baxter, Graeme, Johnson, Ian, & Williams, Dorothy. 2002. Impact Evaluationof Museums, Archives and Libraries: Available Evidence Project. Aberdeen: Resource, TheCouncil for Museums, Archives and Libraries. [online]. [cited 2011.7.6].<http://ww.resource.gov.uk/documents/id16rep.pdf>.

41.

Whitmire, Ethelene. 2002. “Academic library performance measures and undergraduates'library use and educational outcomes." Library & Information Science Research, 24(2):107-128.

42.

Wisconsin Technology Council. 2004. The Economic Value of Academic Research andDevelopment in Wisconsin. [online]. [cited 2011.7.6].<www.wisconsinangelnetwork.com/.../academic_r&d_report.pdf>.

43.

Yoon, Hee Yoon, & Kim, Sin Young. 2008. “Correlation analysis between university researchcompetitiveness and library's scholarly information in OECD nations and Korea." Scientometrics,74(3): 345-360.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science