바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.46 No.1
Citation Share

A Case Study of USC SLIS for Improving Library and Information Science Curriculum in Korea

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2012, v.46 no.1, pp.341-363
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.1.341

(2012). A Case Study of USC SLIS for Improving Library and Information Science Curriculum in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(1), 341-363, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.1.341
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study described the Library and Information Science program at USC as compared with those of Korean national universities; and suggested ways to improve them. Data was collected through interviews, literature review, and analysis of the USC SLIS homepage. A number of features in USC SLIS can be implemented in Korea and gain positive results. In the near future, some of the features that can be introduced in Korean universities to strengthen their programs may include: setting distinct objectives for MA and Ph. D programs, constructing the aims and courses of doctoral programs in the direction of improving the research skills of students, and increasing the number of courses on Children and Juvenile. In the long term, students will also benefit from other changes such as adjusting courses to train school librarians and offering double-major tracks for graduate students.

keywords
사우스캐롤라이나대학 문헌정보학과, 문헌정보학 교과과정, 비교도서관학, 문헌정보학 교육, 문헌정보학 학위, USC SLIS, Library and Information Science Curriculum, Comparative Librarianship, Library and Information Science Education, Library and Information Science Degree

Reference

1.

곽철완. 2007. 미국 주 도서관 서비스의 분석. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 41(2): 203-218.

2.

교육과학기술부. 2012. “교원양성.” [online]. [cited 2012.1.15].<http://www.mest.go.kr/web/977/ko/board/list.do?bbsId=61>.

3.

金容成. 1992. 比較圖書館學의 學問的 特性. 『人文科學硏究論叢』 (明知大學校 附設 人文科學硏究所), 9: 73-89.

4.

남영준, 허운순. 2005. 주제전문사서 양성을 위한 문헌정보학 교과과정 연구. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 36(3): 39-64.

5.

남태우. 1983. 비교도서관학의 이론. 『도서관학보』 (중앙대), 4(10): 191-212.

6.

대학정보공시센터. 2012. [online]. [cited 2012.2.16]. <http://www.academyinfo.go.kr/subjectSearchAction.do>.

7.

도태현. 2006. 공공도서관 서비스 개발을 위한 사례 연구. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 37(3): 131-150.

8.

변우열. 2008. 독서교육 지도자의 자질과 양성 프로그램에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』,39(3): 187-212.

9.

손정표. 1978. 『독서지도방법론』. 서울: 학문사.

10.

손정표. 1999. 『독서지도방법론』. 서울: 학문사.

11.

엄영애. 2007. 미국과 영국 정보전문직 교육 현황의 비교 연구. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 38(4): 277-298.

12.

이명희. 2005. 독서교육 교과목의 내용 구성에 관한 연구. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 18(1): 35.

13.

이지훈. 2000. 『사례연구방법』. 대전: 대경, 6.

14.

정연경. 2002. 캐나다의 기록학 대학원 교육프로그램에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 33(4): 37-59.

15.

정연경. 2005. 한국과 미국의 대학원 기록관리학 교과과정에 관한 비교 연구. 『한국기록관리학회지』, 5(2): 5-25.

16.

정진수. 2010. 미국의 통합대출서비스 사례 조사 및 분석. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 21(2): 5-13.

17.

崔銀珠. 1984. 比較圖書館學의 硏究方法論. 『圖書館』, 270: 17-34.

18.

Choi, Jae Hwang. 1997. Education for Information Science in the Republic of Korea(South Korea) and the United States: A Comparative Study. Ph.D. diss., The Florida State University.

19.

Feehan, Patricia E. 2010. [cited 2010.12.11]. E-mail communication.

20.

Paris, Marion. 1988. “Thoughts on the case study.” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 29(fall): 137-139.

21.

Powell, Ronald R. 1995. Basic Research Methods for Librarians. Libraries and Information Science Series. 재인용: 홍현진 역, 『문헌정보학의 연구방법론』. 서울: 구미무역출판부, 1996, 89-90.

22.

Roughen, Patrick. 2010. [cited 2010.12.23]. E-mail communication.

23.

Sarah, Keeling. 2011. [cited 2011.1.4]. E-mail communication.

24.

U.S. News & World Report. 2011. “Education: Grad schools.” [online]. [cited 2011.3.16]. <http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-library-information-science-programs/university-of-south-carolina-218663>.

25.

U.S. News & World Report. 2012. “Education: Grad schools.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/search.result/program+top-library-information-science-programs/top-library-information-science-programs+y>.

26.

University of South Carolina(USC). 2012. “Academic bulletins.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.14]. <http://bulletin.sc.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=36&poid=4171&returnto=4235>.

27.

USC. 2010. Highlights. “Rankings.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://www.sc.edu/highlights/item.php?hid=7&a=y>.

28.

USC SLIS. 2012. “Bachelor of science in information science.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://www.libsci.sc.edu/bsinfosci/index.html>.

29.

USC SLIS. 2010. “Course descriptions.” [online]. [cited 2010.12.15]. <http://www.libsci.sc.edu/program/newcoursesoffered.htm>.

30.

USC SLIS. 2012. “A checklist of certification requirements for school library media candidates.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.17]. <http://www.libsci.sc.edu//slm/SLMCertificationChecklist.pdf>.

31.

USC SLIS. 2012. “Faculty/Staff.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://www.libsci.sc.edu/fsd/index.htm>.

32.

USC SLIS. 2012. “Joint program in library & information science and public history.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.17]. <http://www.libsci.sc.edu/program/joiint.htm>.

33.

USC SLIS. 2012. “Master of library and information science.” [online]. [cited 2012.2.14]. <http://www.libsci.sc.edu/program/masters.html>.

34.

University of North Carolina(UNC), School of Information and Library Science. 2012. [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://sils.unc.edu/programs/>.

35.

Syracuse University School of Information Studies. 2012. [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://ischool.syr.edu/academics/undergraduate/index.aspx>.

36.

University of Washington Information School. 2012. [online]. [cited 2012.2.13]. <http://ischool.uw.edu/academics>.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy