바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

멀티미디어 정보요구와 검색행태에 관한 탐색적 연구

An Exploratory Investigation on Multimedia Information Needs and Searching Behavior among College Students

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2012, v.46 no.3, pp.251-270
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.3.251
정은경 (이화여자대학교)

초록

일상생활에서 멀티미디어 검색은 중요한 검색활동이며, 멀티미디어 정보요구와 검색행태는 그 특성상 텍스트 기반의 정보요구와 검색행태와는 달리 고유한 특성을 지닌다. 본 연구는 서울시내 남녀 대학생 20명의 멀티미디어 정보요구와 검색행태에 관하여 탐색적 고찰을 제시하였다. 대학생의 멀티미디어 정보요구와 이에 따른 검색과정이 녹화 및 녹취되었으며, 사후심층면담도 함께 이루어졌다. 이러한 데이터의 분석결과는 멀티미디어 검색원, 정보요구, 적합성 판단 근거, 검색저해요인으로 구분하여 제시되었다. 검색원의 특징으로는 국내포털사이트와 구글이 주로 사용되었으나, 이미지, 오디오, 비디오의 개별 멀티미디어의 특성을 반영한 검색원이 규명되었다. 멀티미디어 정보요구는 특정한 정보요구가 보편적인 정보요구에 비해 많이 추구되었으나 개별 멀티미디어의 특성에 따라 보편적 정보요구의 비중은 다르게 나타났다. 멀티미디어 적합성 판단 기준과 검색저해요인은 개별 멀티미디어에 따라 상당히 다양하게 발견되었다. 이러한 결과는 기존의 통합적 멀티미디어의 검색 환경에서 개별 멀티미디어 정보요구와 특성이 반영된 검색환경 구현이 필요하다는 것을 보여준다.

keywords
Multimedia, Audio, Video, Image, Information Needs, Searching Behavior, 멀티미디어, 정보요구, 검색행태, 대학생, 비디오, 오디오, 이미지, Multimedia, Audio, Video, Image, Information Needs, Searching Behavior

Abstract

Multimedia needs and searching have become important in everyday life, especially in a younger generation. The characteristics of multimedia needs and searching behaviors are distinctive compared to textual information needs and searching behaviors in a wide variety of ways. By interviewing and observing multimedia needs and searching behaviors of college students from 20 areas in Seoul, this study aims to improve the understanding on users' multimedia needs and how users search multimedia. The findings are presented in terms of searching sources, multimedia needs, relevance criteria and searching barriers. For multimedia, the searching sources are found primarily as Naver and Google and the distinguished features are presented depending on the individual multimedia types. As multimedia needs are categorized into generic, specific and abstract, most of the needs are classified as specific needs rather than generic needs, but there exist differences depending on the types of multimedia. In addition, the aspects of relevance criteria and searching barriers are reflected with the characteristics of individual multimedia types. The findings of this study demonstrate that distinctive indexing and searching environments depending on the types of multimedia might be necessary to improve the quality of multimedia searching.

keywords
Multimedia, Audio, Video, Image, Information Needs, Searching Behavior, 멀티미디어, 정보요구, 검색행태, 대학생, 비디오, 오디오, 이미지, Multimedia, Audio, Video, Image, Information Needs, Searching Behavior

참고문헌

1.

박소연. 2010. 국내 포털 이용자들의 멀티미디어 검색 행태 분석. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 44(1): 101-115.

2.

Chen, H. 2001. “An analysis of image queries in the field of art history.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3): 260-273.

3.

Choi, Y., & Rasmussen, E. 2003. “Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6): 498-511.

4.

Chung, E. 2010. “A preliminary examination on the multimedia needs and web searches of college students in Korea.” Journal of the Korean Library and Information Society, 44(4): 95-114.

5.

Chung, E., & Yoon, J. 2011. “Image needs in the context of image use: An exploratory study.” Journal of Information Science, 37(2): 163-177.

6.

Conniss, L. R., Ashford, A. J., & Graham, M. E. 2000. Information Seeking Behavior in Image Retrieval: Visor I Final Report. Library and Information Commission Research Report, 95.

7.

Cox, I. J., Miller, M. L., Minka, T. P., Papathomas, T. V., & Yianilos, P. N. 2000. “The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: Theory, implementation, and psychophysical experiments.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(1): 20-37.

8.

Cunningham, S. J., & Masoodian, M. 2004. “Looking for a picture: An analysis of everyday image information searching.” Proceedings of the Joint Conference for Digitial Libraries, 198-199.

9.

Cunningham, S. J., & Nichols, D. M. 2008. “How people find videos.” Proceedings of the Joint Conference for Digital Libraries, 201-210.

10.

Cunningham, S. J., Bainbridge, D., & Masoodian, M. 2004. “How people describe their image information needs: A grounded theory analysis of visual art queries.” Proceedings of the Joint Conference for Digital Libraries, 47-48.

11.

Cunningham, S. J., Reeves, N., & Britland, M. 2003. “An ethnography study of music information seeking: Implications for the design of a music digital library.” Proceedings of the Joint Conference for Digital Libraries, 5-17.

12.

Eakins, J. P., Briggs, P., & Burford, B. 2004. “Image retrieval interfaces: A user perspective.” In Image and Video Retrieval. Edited by P. Enser, Y. Kompatsiaris, N. E. O’Connor, A. F. Smeaton, and A. W. M. SMeulders. Lecture Note in Computer Science, Vol. 3115. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 628-637.

13.

Enser, P. G. B. 2008. “Visual image retrieval.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 3-42.

14.

Goodrum, A., & Spink, A. 2001. “Image searching on the Excite Web search engine.” Information Processing & Management, 37: 295-311.

15.

Huurnink, B., Holink, L., van den Heuvel, W., & de Rijke, M. 2010. “Search behavior of media professionals at an audiovisual archive: A transaction log analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6): 1180-1197.

16.

Jansen, B. J., Goodrum, A., & Spink, A. 2000. “Searching for multimedia: Analysis of audio, video and image web queries." World Wide Web Journal, 3(4): 249-254.

17.

Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Pederson, J. 2004. “An analysis of multimedia searching on AltaVista.” Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, 186-192.

18.

Lee, J. H. 2010. “Analysis of users needs and information features in natural language queries seeking music information.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5): 1025-1045.

19.

Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. 2000. “End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive.” Information Retrieval, 1(4): 259-285.

20.

McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. 2009. “Image use within the work task model: Images as information and illustration.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12): 2416-2429.

21.

McPherson, J., & Bainbridge, D. 2001. “Usage of the MELDEX digital music library.” The Proceedings of International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, 15-17.

22.

Ozmutlu, S., Spink, A., & Ozmutlu, H. C. 2003. “Multimedia web searching trends: 1997-2001.” Information Processing & Management, 39(4): 611-621.

23.

Shatford, S. 1986. “Analyzing the subject of a picture: a theoretical approach.” Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 6(3): 39-62.

24.

St. Jean, B., Rieh, S. Y., Kim, Y., & Yang, J. 2012. “An analysis of the information behaviors, goals, and intentions of frequent Internet users: Findings from online activity diaries.” First Monday, 17(2). [online]. <http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3870/3143>.

25.

Tjondronegoro, D., Spink, A., & Jensen, B. J. 2009. “A study and comparison of multimedia web searching: 1997-2006.” Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 60(9): 1756-1768.

26.

Yang, M., & Marchionini, G. 2004. “Exploring users’ video relevance criteria: A pilot study.”Proceedings of the American Society for the Information Science and Technology, 41: 229-238.

27.

Yoon, J., & Chung, E. 2011. “Understanding image needs in daily life by analyzing questions in a social Q&A site.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11): 2201-2213.

한국문헌정보학회지