바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.47 No.2
Citation Share

A Comparative Study on Curriculum Contents and Teaching Methods Based on the Syllabi of Library and Information Science in Korea and Foreign Universities

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2013, v.47 no.2, pp.223-245
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.223




& (2013). A Comparative Study on Curriculum Contents and Teaching Methods Based on the Syllabi of Library and Information Science in Korea and Foreign Universities. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(2), 223-245, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.223
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze curriculum contents, teaching methods and evaluation methods for the core courses in Library & Information Science. It focuses on syllabi both of Korean and foreign universities, and compares them to figure out their own characteristics and differences. The study aims to contribute to the advancements of domestic Library & Information Science in regards to their curriculum contents and methods. To this end, we collected and analyzed the syllabi of Information Organization, Information & Reference Services, Information Retrieval and Management of Libraries, which are used in the foreign LIS departments. As results, we found some differences between curriculum contents, teaching methods and evaluation methods used by Korean and foreign universities. In teaching methods, especially, the classes in Korean universities used the forms of lecture, presents, examination, while classes in foreign universities used more various methods, such as workshop, project, developing system, simulation, case study, interviews with expert.

keywords
수업내용, 수업방법, 평가방법, 문헌정보학, 핵심과목, 강의계획서, Curriculum Contents, Teaching Methods, Evaluation Methods, Library & Information Science, Core Courses, Syllabus

Reference

1.

곽동철, 심경, 윤정옥. 2009. 사서자격제도 개선 방안 도출 및 적용에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 43(2): 193-213.

2.

김종성. 2006. 사서교사 양성을 위한 문헌정보학 교과목의 내용과 교육의 전략적 강조점에 관한연구. ..한국비블리아학회지.., 17(1): 135-159.

3.

김태경. 2007. 한국문헌정보학 교육에서 정보이용자교육 교과과정 모형개발 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 41(2): 382-412.

4.

노동조. 2009. 한국의 문헌정보학 교육을 위한 표준교육과정 개발에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 43(4): 451-468.

5.

노영희, 안인자, 최상기. 2011a. ..전문사서 경쟁력 제고를 위한 문헌정보학 전공과목 정비방안 연구...서울: 국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소.

6.

노영희, 안인자, 최상기. 2011b. 한국 문헌정보학 교과목의 실용성 평가에 관한 연구. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 42(4): 5-29.

7.

노영희, 안인자, 최상기. 2012. 한국문헌정보학 교과과정 운영모형 및 표준교과목 개발에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 46(2): 55-82.

8.

노영희, 안인자, 최상기. 2013. 국내 문헌정보학 주요 교과목 강의계획서 분석 및 개발 연구, ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 44(1): 143-175.

9.

박소연. 2001. 미국 문헌정보학 교육과정 내 연구방법론 교육의 특성과 현황. ..한국정보관리학회제8회 학술대회 논문집.., 8: 249-252.

10.

엄영애. 2002. 문헌정보학과의 정보기술 교과목에 대한 연구. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 33(3): 415-430.

11.

이명희. 2007. 독서교육 교과목의 내용 구성에 관한 연구: 문헌정보학과에서 제공되는 독서교육과목을 중심으로. ..한국비블리아학회지.., 18(1): 23-44.

12.

이삼형, 박희찬, 정옥년. 2001. 독서교육 전문가 역할과 양성. ..독서연구.., 6: 163-189.

13.

장덕현, 최고운. 2008. 대학도서관 정보활용교육 모형 개발에 관한 연구. ..한국비블리아학회지.., 19(1): 37-60.

14.

정연경. 2002. 미국 문헌정보학 대학원의 기록관리학 교육과정에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 36(4): 101-122.

15.

정재영. 2008. 대학도서관의 웹기반 정보활용교육 모델 개발에 관한 연구. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 39(1): 195-217.

16.

Drexel University, College of Information Science and Technology. [cited 2013.3.12]. <http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/>.

17.

Indiana University-Bloomington, School of Library and Information Science. [cited 2013. 3.11]. <http://ils.indiana.edu/courses/>.

18.

Noh, Younghee, Ahn, In-Ja, & Choi, Sang-Ki. 2012. “A Study of Changes in the library and Information Science Curriculum with Evaluation of Its Practicality." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6): 348-364.

19.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jergy, School of Communication & Information Science, [cited 2013.3.11]. <http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/>.

20.

Simmons College, Graduate School of Library and Information Science. [cited 2013.3.12]. <http://www.simmons.edu/gslis/>.

21.

Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. [cited 2013.3.11]. <http://ischool.syr.edu/default.aspx>.

22.

The University of British Columbia, School of Library, Archival & Information Studies. [cited 2013.3.13]. <http://www.slais.ubc.ca/courses/timetables/timetables.htm>.

23.

The University of Tennessee, School of Information Science. [cited 2013.3.13]. <http://www.sis.utk.edu/programs>,

24.

The University of Western Ontario, Faculty of Information & Media Studies. [cited 2013.3.13]. <http://www.fims.uwo.ca/acad_programs/grad/lis/mlis/Courses.htm>.

25.

University of Maryland, College of Information Studies. [cited 2013.3.12].<http://ischool.umd.edu/content/syllabi>.

26.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Information and Library Science. [cited 2013.3.11]. <http://sils.unc.edu/courses>.

27.

University of Texas at Austin, School of Information. [cited 2013.3.12]. <https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/>.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy