바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study for the Efficiency Analysis on Big Deals of Electronic Journal

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2013, v.47 no.4, pp.187-210
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.187


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The consumption through e-journal consortia makes researchers locate and use academic resources and information extensively with comparatively cheap costs. This study analyzed and investigated substantive benefits of the big deal contracts for e-journal subscriptions in terms of efficient information use. In other words, this study compare concretely the differences in efficiency of using information between large-size institutions and small-size institutions who participate in the e-journal big deal contracts. This study suggests solutions for the problems which occur persistently and repeatedly in the big deal and new counter plans which can replace the current methods of big deal contracts in a long-term perspective by revealing the gaps of acquiring and using information by the size of participating institutions.

keywords
KESLI Consortium, Cooperate Purchase, Electronic Journal, Big Deal, Efficiency, 전자저널, 컨소시엄, 공동구매, 빅딜계약, 효율성, KESLI, 지출비용당 정보가치, 타이틀단위 지출비용, 논문건당 지출비용

Reference

1.

김상준, 김정환. 2011. 전자저널 빅딜 계약의 연구 동향과 대안 탐색. ..정보관리연구.., 42(1): 85-111.

2.

김성진, 정은경, 한민혜. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄을 둘러싼 학술커뮤니케이션의 쟁점과 대응동향. ..정보관리연구.., 39(1): 27-52.

3.

김정환, 이응봉. 2009. KESLI 컨소시엄의 주요이슈 분석에 관한 연구. ..정보관리연구.., 40(3): 99-123.

4.

신은자. 2007. 학술지 빅딜판매의 문제점 및 개선방안. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 41(1): 378-389.

5.

심원식. 2012. 빅딜, 오픈액세스, 구글학술검색과 대학도서관의 전자학술정보구독. ..정보관리학회지.., 29(4): 143-163.

6.

이소연. 2008. 새로운 학술커뮤니케이션 환경과 미래형 전자저널 컨소시엄 운영모형: KESLI를중심으로. ..정보관리연구.., 39(1): 1-25.

7.

전혜영, 박수희. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄의 이해관계자 요구 분석 연구. ..정보관리연구.., 39(1): 53-82.

8.

황옥경. 2004. 전자저널 라이선스 계약모델에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 38(1): 199-228.

9.

Amy Yeager. 2013. “ARL Academic Health Sciences Library Statistics 2010-2011." ARL Digital Publication. [online]. [cited 2013.5.31]. <http://publications.arl.org/ARL-Academic-Health-Sciences-Library-Statistics-2010-2011/>.

10.

Best, R. D. 2009. “Is the “Big Deal" dead?” The Serials Librarian, 57(4): 353-363.

11.

Blecic, D. B., Wiberley, S. E., & Fiscella, J. B. 2013. “Deal of No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals." College & Research Libraries, 74(2): 178-194.

12.

Boissy, R. W. et al. 2012. “Is the Big Deal Dying?" Serials Review, 38(1): 36-45.

13.

Bosch, S., & Henderson, K. 2012. “Periodicals price survey 2012." Library Journal, April 30. [online]. [cited 2013.5.7]. <http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2012/04/funding/coping-with-the-terrible-twins-periodicals-p rice-survey-2012/>.

14.

Bucknall, Tim. 2009. “A comparative evaluation of journal literature access options at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.” Interlending & Document Supply, 37(3): 140-142.

15.

Bucknell, Terry. 2008. “Usage statistics for big deals: supporting library decision-making.” Learned Publishing, 21(3): 193-199.

16.

Prabha, Chandra. 2007. “Shifting from Print to Electronic Journals in ARL University Libraries." Serials Review, 33(1): 4-13.

17.

Conyers, Angela, & Dalton, Pete. 2008. Assessing the value of the NESLi2 deals.: a report for JISC collections. JISC. [online]. [cited 2013.5.6]. <http://www.ebase.bcu.ac.uk>.

18.

Gargiulo, P. 2003. “Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy." The Serials, 16(3): 293-298.

19.

Ives, Gary, & Fallon, Steve. 2009. “Stung if you do, stung if you don't-the good and the bad of the big deal.” Serials Librarian, 56(1): 163-167.

20.

Schopfel, Joachim, & Leduc, Claire. 2012. “Big deal and long tail: e-journal usage and subscriptions." Library Review, 61(7): 497-510.

21.

Kurata, K. M. et al. 2007. “Electronic Journals and their unbundled functions in scholarly communication: Views and utilization by scientific, technological and medical researchers in Japan." Information Processing and Management, 43: 1402-1415.

22.

Tattersall, M. 2003. “Big deals: reflections on electronic journal acquisition 1996-2003.” Serials, 16(2): 201-204.

23.

Wolfe, Donna., Tafuri, Narda, Owen, Noella, Day, Rebecca, & Lesher, Marcella. 2009. “Smoking out the big deal: getting what you want without getting stung.” Serials Librarian, 56(1): 116-121.

24.

Wolverton, R. E., & Bucknall, T. 2008. “Are consortium “Big Deals'' cost effective?: a comparison and analysis of E-journal access mechanisms-workshop report.” Serials Librarian, 55(3): 469-477.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science