-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
중학생 학습과제 수행을 위한 정보탐색과정에서 적합성 및 비적합성에 관한 연구 - 에듀넷 사이트를 중심으로 -
User-based Relevance and Irrelevance Criteria during the Task Pursuing of Middle School Students
박성재 (한성대학교)
초록
다수의 이용자 기반 적합성 기준에 관한 연구가 수행되어 왔지만 여전히 추가 연구의 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 추가연구 수행의 필요성은 다음과 같은 사항의 미비와 관련 된다: ① 어린 이용자 집단 대상의 연구, ② 웹 환경에서의 연구, ③ 비적합성기준에 관한 연구 및 관련 시스템과 서비스 개선을 위한 시사점 도출. 이에 본 연구는 KERIS 에듀넷 사이트를 활용하는 40명의 중학교 3학년 학생들의 탐색 및 자료평가 과정을 조사해 적합성 및 비적합성기준을 식별하였다. 연구결과는 16종류의 적합성기준, 8종류의 비적합성기준을 보여주었다. 연구결과를 기반으로 한 제안점은 관련 시스템 및 서비스 개선과 관련된다.
- keywords
- 적합성기준, 정보추구행태, 정보탐색행태, 이용자연구, 정보시스템, 정보서비스, Relevance Criteria, Information Seeking Behavior, Information Search Behavior, User Study, Information System, Information Service
Abstract
Although a significant number of studies have been conducted in user-based relevance criteria, a need for further research still remains. The rational is associated with the following inadequacies: ① research on young user groups, ② research on the Web environment with multimedia resources, ③ research on the irrelevance criteria and implications to improve related systems and services. Accordingly, this study identified user-based relevance and irrelevance criteria, examining 40 middle school third grader students who use KERIS Edunet site. The results identified 16 relevance criteria and 8 irrelevance criteria. Major implications related to information system and service improvements.
- keywords
- 적합성기준, 정보추구행태, 정보탐색행태, 이용자연구, 정보시스템, 정보서비스, Relevance Criteria, Information Seeking Behavior, Information Search Behavior, User Study, Information System, Information Service
참고문헌
김윤옥 외. 2009. 질적연구실천방법 . 교육과학사.
박정아. 2010. 정보검색에서의 사용자중심 적합성 판단 모형 개발 및 평가 . 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원 인지과학협동과정 인지과학과정.
박정아. 2012. 통합검색환경에서 이용자 적합성 판단 기준에 관한 탐색적 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 29(2): 113-133.
배경재. 2014. 대학생의 과제해결과정 중 정보적합성 판단에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 31(1):189-206.
조성남 외. 2011. 질적연구방법과 실제 . 도서출판 그린.
Barry, C. 1994. “User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3): 149-159.
Barry, C. L. and Schamber, L. 1998. “Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison.” Information Processing & Management, 34: 219-236.
Bilal, D. 2000. “Children's use of the Yahooligans! web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical and affecive behaviors on fact-based search tasks.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7): 646-665.
Cool, C., Belkin, N. J., Frieder, O. and Kantor, P. B. 1993. Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgments. In M.E. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting (pp.77-84). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M. and Sjoberg, G. 1991. A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.
Flick, U. 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications.
Froehlich, T. J. 1994. “Relevance reconsidered: Towards an agenda for the 21st century:Introduction to special topic issue on relevance research.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 124-134.
Hirsh, S. G. 1999. “Chlidren's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 1265-1283.
Kim, Y. 2011. “Appraising the interface features of Web search engines based on user-defined relevance criteria.” Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 22(1): 247-262.
Krathwohl, D. R. 1998. Methods of Educational & Social Science Research (2nded.). New York: LONGMAN.
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E. G. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE publications.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park: SAGE publications.
Park, T. 1993. “The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study.” Library Quarterly, 63(3): 318-351.
Park, H. 1997. “Relevance of science information: Origins and dimensions of relevance and their implications to information retrieval.” Information Processing and Management, 33(3):339-352.
Rieh, S. Y. 2000. Information quality and cognitive authority in the World Wide Web. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Rieh, S. Y. 2002. “Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the web.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Tecnology, 53(2): 146-161.
Savolainen, R. and Kari, J. 2006. “User-defined relevance criteria in web searching.” Journal of Documentation, 62(6): 685-707.
Schamber, L. 1991. Users' criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Schamber, L. 1994. “Relevance and information behavior.” Annual Reviews of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 29: 3-48.
Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., and Nilan, M. S. 1990. “A re-examination of relevance:Toward a dynamic, situational definition.” Information Processing and Management, 26(6):755-776.
Simons, H. 1980. (Ed.). Toward a science of the singular. Norwich: University of East Anglia, Center for Applied Research in Education.
Stake, R. E. 1994. “Case Studies," N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedure for developing grounded theory (2nded.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Taylor, A. 2012. “Examination of work task and criteria choices for the relevance judgement process.” Journal of Documentation, 69(4): 523-544.
Tombros, A., Ruthven, I. and Jose, J. M. 2005. “How users access web pages for information seeking.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Tecnology, 56(4):327-344.
Wang, P. and Soergel, D. 1998. “A cognitive model of document use during a research project:Study 1. Document selection.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2):115-133.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수