-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
태그 조직화를 위한 소셜 메타데이터 프레임워크 구축
Construction of Social Metadata Framework for Organizing Social Tags
초록
소셜 메타데이터는 이용자의 자발적인 참여를 통해 정보자원에 대한 풍부한 기술사항을 생성한다는 장점을 지니고 있지만, 조직화 된 구조를 적용하기 어렵다는 특성으로 인해 여러 가지 한계 또한 보이고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 소셜 메타데이터의 유형 가운데 태그를 중심으로 LibraryThing에서 활용되고 있는 태그의 의미를 분석하고, 이를 기반으로 기술의 대상이 되는 정보자원의 서지적 카테고리를 제공함으로써 태그의 의미적 조직화를 위한 대안적인 방안을 제안하였다. 서지적 카테고리를 구조적으로 제공하고 이를 통해 태그 부여단계에서 태그의 의미적 조직화를 유도하기 위해 소셜 인포메이션 아키텍쳐를 적용하여 태그의 조직화를 위한 소셜 메타데이터 프레임워크를 구축하였다. 이는 소셜 메타데이터의 조직화를 위한 개념적인 기반을 제공함으로써 향후 태그를 자동화 된 방식으로 조직하는데 활용할 수 있는 의미적 기반을 마련해 줄 것으로 기대된다.
- keywords
- 소셜 메타데이터, 소셜 인포메이션 아키텍쳐, 태그, 서지적 카테고리, 기술사항, LibraryThing, Social Metadata, Social Information Architecture, Tag, Bibliographic Category, Resource Description, LibraryThing
Abstract
Although social metadata has strengths in creating amount of user-contributed resource descriptions, its function is limited because of its non-systematic characteristics. This research proposed an alternative approach to semantic organization of social metadata. It analyzed the semantics of tags created in LibraryThing in order to provide bibliographic categories for describing information resources. Social information Architecture is adopted in generating the bibliographic categories so that social metadata framework can be constructed. This framework can provide the conceptual foundations for semantically organizing social metadata and is expected to be applied to the existing approaches to automatically organize social metadata.
- keywords
- 소셜 메타데이터, 소셜 인포메이션 아키텍쳐, 태그, 서지적 카테고리, 기술사항, LibraryThing, Social Metadata, Social Information Architecture, Tag, Bibliographic Category, Resource Description, LibraryThing
참고문헌
강신재 and Ding, Y. 2008. 태그 온톨로지와 기계학습을 이용한 추천시스템. 한국산업정보학회논문지, 13(5): 133-141.
Al-Khalifa, H. S. and Davis, H. C. 2007. “Exploring the Value of Folksonomies for Creating Semantic Metadata.” International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 3(1):13-39.
Alemu, G. B., Stevens, P. R. and Chandler, J. 2012. “The Social Space of Metadata: Perspectives of LIS Academics and Postgraduates on Standards-Based and Socially Constructed Metadata Approaches.” Journal of Library Metadata, 12(4): 311-344.
Bischoff, K. et al. 2008. Can All Tags Be Used for Search? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Napa Valley, California, October 26-October 30, 2008, pp.193-202.
Brown, D. 2010. “Eight Principles of Information Architecture.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(6): 30-34.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2014. Social Impact Assessment. [online] [cited 2014. 8. 27.] <http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/analytics/social-impact.htm>
Golder, S. and Huberman, B. 2006. “Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems.” Journal of Information Science, 32(2): 198-208.
Guy, M. and Tonkin, E. 2006. Folksonomies: Tidying up tags?. D-Lib Magazine, 12(1). [online] [cited 2014. 7. 25.] <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html>
Kakali, C. and Papatheodorou, C. 2010. “Exploitation of Folksonomies in Subject Analysis.”Library & Information Science Research, 32: 192-202.
Kipp, M. 2007. Tagging Practices on Research Oriented Social Bookmarking Sites. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, Montreal, QC, May 10-12, 2007. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 24.] <http://www.dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1533/>
Lin, X. et al. 2006. Exploring Characteristics of Social Classification. In Proceedings of the 17th ASIS&T Classification Research Workshop, Austin, Texas, November 4, 2006.
Mika, P. 2007. “Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics.”Journal of Web Semantics, 5(1): 5-15.
Online Computer Library Center (OCLC). 2012. Social Metadata for Libraries, Archives and Museums, Part 1: Site Reviews. [online] [cited 2013. 5. 15.]<http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2012/2012-01r.html>
Paul, P. K. 2014. Information Architecture and Social Information Architecture: Valuable Domain for Building Information Society - A Conceptual Overview. Pinnacle Educational Research & Development, 2014. [online] [cited 2014. 9. 2.]<http://pjpub.org/perd/perd_110.pdf>
Saracevic, T. 2010. The Notion of Context in “Information Interaction in Context.” In Proceedings of the IIiX 2010 Information Interaction in Context Symposium, New Brunswick, MJ, USA, August 18-21, 2010.
Smith, G. 2007. Social Information Architecture. Presentation in Information Architecture Summit 2007, Las Vegas, nevada, US, March 22, 2007. [online] [cited 2014. 8. 25.]<http://www.slideshare.net/gsmith/social-information-architecture-workshop>
Smith, Gene. 2008. “Tagging: Emerging Trends.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(6): 14-17.
Thomas, M., Caudle, D. and Schmitz, C. 2009. “To Tag or Not to Tag?” Library Hi Tech, 27(3): 411-434.
Tonkin, E. 2006. Searching the Long Tail: Hidden Structure in Social Tagging. In J. Furner & J. T. Tennis, ed., In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Austin, Texas, November 4, 2006.
Voss, J. 2006. Collaborative Thesaurus Tagging the Wikipedia Way. [online] [cited 2014.7. 25.] <http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.IR/0604036>
Warterna, C. and Brussee, R. 2008. Instanced-Based Mapping Between Thesauri and Folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Semantic Web Conference, Karisruhe, Germany, October 26-30, 2008, pp.356-370.
Wra, T. and Eklund, P. W. 2010. Social Tagging for Digital Libraries Using Formal Concept Analysis. In Kryszkiewicz M. and Obiedkov, S. ed., CLA-2010: Concept Lattice and Their Applications. [online] [cited 2014. 9. 10.] <http://works.bepress.com/peklund/1>
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수