바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Consolidation of FRBR Family Models Focusing on FRBR Library Reference Model

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.1, pp.533-553
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.533

Abstract

FRBR family models, which is published from 1998 to 2010, will be restructured in 2016 and the new name of the model is “FRBR Library Reference Model(LRM).” FRBR LRM is a consolidated model based on the legacy FRBR family of conceptual models - FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD and the two ontological models - FRBRCore and FaBio, as well as FRBRoo, the cooperated model with museum field. In this study, therefore, FRBR LRM is analyzed in respect to background information, characteristics of the model, such as user tasks, entities, attributes, and relationships. Experimental adaptation to protégé for the LRM’s entities and relationships is also conducted. Through this test, the differences between the original models and the consolidated model was reviewed and the applicability of the FRBR LRM model to the semantic web is also discussed. From now on, we have to select and modify among the various FRBR related models to meet our information needs. It will be difficult to find only one Implementation Methodology for every information needs.

keywords
FRBR 개념모형, 서지레코드의 기능요건, 전거데이터의 기능요건, 주제전거 데이터의 기능요건, 객체지향형 FRBR, FRBR 도서관 참조 모형, FRBR Family Models, FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD, FRBRoo, Consolidated FRBR, FRBR Library Reference Model(FRBR LRM)

Reference

1.

Bekiari, C. et al. 2015. FRBR Object-Oriented Definition and Mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD (version 2.3). International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation.

2.

Coyle, K. 2014. FRBR, Twenty Years On. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3/4):265-285.

3.

Coyle, K. 2015. FRBR Before and After: A Look at Our Bibliographic Modes. Chicago: ALA.

4.

Davis, I., and Newman, R. 2005. Expression of Core FRBR Concepts in RDF. [online]. [cited 2016. 1. 5.] <http://vocab.org/frbr/core>

5.

Gueguen, G. et al. 2013. Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description:A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives’ Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.

6.

IFLA FRBR Review Group. 2009. Meeting Report, August 25-26, 2009, Milan. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.] <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbrrg/meeting_2009.pdf>

7.

IFLA Study Group on the FRBR. 2009. Functional Requirements For Bibliographic Records:Final Report. Den Haag: IFLA.

8.

IFLA Working Group on FRANAR. 2009. Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. Den Haag: IFLA.

9.

IFLA Working Group on the FRSAR. 2010. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): A Conceptual Model. Den Haag: IFLA.

10.

The Music Ontology. 2015. The Music Ontology Homepage. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.]<musicontology.com>

11.

Oliver, C. 2015. IFLA’s Conceptual Models: Impact and Evolution. Presentation material at IFLA WLIC 2015, August 19, Cape Town.

12.

Peroni, S., and Shotton, D. 2012. FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for Describing Bibliographic Resources and Citations. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 17, 33-43.

13.

Raimond, Y. et al. 2007. The Music Ontology. Sydney: Australian Computer Society.

14.

Riva, P., and Oliver, C. 2015. Beyond FRBR: FRBRoo and the Consolidated FRBR Model.Presentation material of Canadian Library Association Conference, June 4, 2015, Ottawa:Shaw Centre.

15.

Riva, P., and Žumer, M. 2015. Introducing the FRBR Library Reference Model. Presentation material at IFLA WLIC 2015, August 19, Cape Town.

16.

Shotton, D. 2010. Introducing the Semantic Publishing and Referencing (SPAR) Ontologies. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.]<https://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/>

17.

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research. 2015. Protégé 3.4.2. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.] <http://protege.stanford.edu/>

18.

Willer, M., and Dunsire, G. 2013. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

19.

Žumer, M. 2015. Modeling Versions of KOS with FRBR: With a Short Introduction to FRBR Consolidation. Presentation material of the 1st NKOS Workshop at ICADL, December 9, 2015, Seoul: Yonsei University.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science