바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.50 No.1
Citation Share

대학생 과제보고서에 나타난 인용정보 분석에 관한 연구

Analysis of Citations in Undergraduate Papers

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.1, pp.513-532
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.513
박성재 (한성대학교)
박성재. (2016). 대학생 과제보고서에 나타난 인용정보 분석에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(1), 513-532, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.513
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 학술적 글쓰기에서 대학생들의 자료 인용 행태를 분석함으로써 대학생들의 자료에 대한 인식과 대학도서관 자료의 활용 정도를 측정하여 도서관의 성과를 측정하는 것이다. 서울 소재 대학의 학기말 보고서 공모전에 제출된 80편의 보고서에 인용된 자료의 유형과 도서관 소장여부를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 대학생들의 논문 인용에 대한 지식 수준은 매우 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 웹 정보에 대한 의존도(44.9%)가 높았지만 다른 유형의 자료, 즉 단행본, 학술지, 학위논문 등의 경우에는 대학도서관의 활용도가 높게 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구는 대학도서관이 대학생들의 학술적 글쓰기 능력신장을 위해 수업활동에 적극적으로 참여하고 인용과 참고문헌에 대한 효과적인 교육자료를 개발하는데 힘쓸 것을 제안한다.

keywords
Undergraduate, Citation, Reference, Research Ethics, Academic Library, Literacy Education, Outcome, 대학생, 인용, 참고문헌, 연구윤리, 대학도서관, 리터러시 교육, 성과

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of undergraduate citation behavior and to measure the contribution which an academic library makes in the academic writing of students. Citations in 80 student papers submitted in the academic paper competition was analyzed for types of items cited and the number of items in the library collection, etc. The findings indicate: 1) the level of undergraduates’ citation knowledge is very low, 2) undergraduates prefer web resources (44.9%) to such academic resources as books, journal articles, theses or dissertation, and 3) undergraduates find academic resources in their academic library. Upon these findings, this study suggests that academic library staff should intervene to enhance undergraduate academic writing skills and to develope of educational material, including how to search for and cite reliable resources.

keywords
Undergraduate, Citation, Reference, Research Ethics, Academic Library, Literacy Education, Outcome, 대학생, 인용, 참고문헌, 연구윤리, 대학도서관, 리터러시 교육, 성과

참고문헌

1.

곽동철. 2007. 학술논문에서 표절의 유형과 올바른 인용 방식에 관한 고찰. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(3), 103-126.

2.

김성수. 2008. 미국 대학의 ‘학문적 정직성’ 정책에 대한 연구- 대학 글쓰기에서 ‘표절’ 문제를 중심으로. 작문연구, 6, 193-226.

3.

송영희 외. 2013. 디지털시대의 장서관리. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

4.

심원식, 변제연, 김민정. 2013. 학술논문에서의 위키피디아 인용에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(2), 247-264.

5.

이인영. 2011. 대학생의 학술적 글쓰기에 나타난 자료 이용 실태 분석. 비평문학, 41, 279-320.

6.

이지연, 이상곤. 2008. 과제표절과 관련한 대학생의 디지털 정보원 활용 현황에 관한 조사연구. 열린교육연구, 16(3), 103-121.

7.

이혜영, 남태우. 2010. 대학생들의 인용 및 표절에 관한 인식연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(3):175-198.

8.

이혜영. 2011. 대학도서관에서의 과제 작성 교육에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 42(1):369-395.

9.

이혜영. 2012. 대학도서관의 인용 및 참고문헌작성 교육 현황. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(3):35-56.

10.

최선경. 2009. 대학생 글쓰기에 나타난 오류 분석: 인용방식의 오류를 중심으로. 새국어교육, 81, 299-324.

11.

Ackerson, L. G., and Young, V. E. 1994. Evaluating the Impact of Library Instruction Methods on the Quality of Student Research. Research Strategies, 12(3), 132-144.

12.

Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., and Williamson, T. 2009. Reputation and Reliability in Collective Goods the Case of the Online Encyclopedia Wikipedia. Rationality and Society, 21(3):283-306.

13.

Barnard, E., and Weaver, N. E. 2011. Student Use of Sources: A Collaborative Investigation of Resource Use in Tertiary-level Psychology Assignments. Lower Hutt: The Open Poytechnic. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.]<https://www.openpolytechnic.ac.nz/assets/Marketing/Research/Current-working-papers/WorkingPaper11-2.pdf>

14.

Brown, A. R. 2011. Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 339-343.

15.

Carlin, J. A., and Damschroder, C. B. 2009. Beautiful and Useful: The Book as a Learning Object. College & Research Library News, 70(3), 168-183.

16.

Carlson, J. 2006. An Examination of Undergraduate Student Citation Behavior. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 14-22.

17.

Cooke, R., and Rosenthal, D. 2011. Students Use More Books after Library Instruction: An Analysis of Undergraduate Paper Citations. College & Research Libraries, 72(4), 332-343.

18.

Davis, P. M. 2003. Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior: Guiding Student Scholarship in a Networked Age. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 41-51.

19.

Dodgen, L. et al. 2003. Not so SILI: Sociology Information Literacy Infusion as the Focus of Faculty and Librarian Collaboration. Community & Junior College Libraries, 11(4), 27-33.

20.

Giles, J. 2005. Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head. Nature, 438(7070), 900-901.

21.

Gratch, B. 1985. Toward a Methodology for Evaluating Research Paper Bibliographies.Research Strategies, 3(4), 170-77.

22.

Grimes D. J., and Boening C. H. 2001. Worries with the Web: A Look at Student Use of Web Resources. College & Research Libraries, 62(1), 11-22.

23.

Haddow, G. 2013. Academic Library Use and Student Retention: A Quantitative Analysis.Library & Information Science Research, 35(2), 127-136.

24.

Head, A. J., and Eisenberg, M. B. 2010. How Today's College Students Use Wikipedia for Course-Related Research. First Monday, 15(3). [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.]<http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2830/2476>

25.

Hovde, K. 2000. Check the Citation: Library Instruction and Student Paper Bibliographies.Research Strategies, 17(1), 3-9.

26.

Hurst, S., and Leonard, J. 2007. Garbage in, Garbage out: The Effect of Library Instruction on the Quality of Students' Term Papers. The Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 8(1). [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.]<http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v08n01/hurst_s01.htm>

27.

Knight-Davis, S., and Sung, J. S. 2008. Analysis of Citations in Undergraduate Papers.College & Research Libraries, 69(5), 447-458.

28.

Kohl, D. F., and Wilson, L. A. 1986. Effectiveness of Course-Integrated Bibliographic Instruction in Improving Coursework. RQ, 1986, 206-211.

29.

Leiding, R. 2005. Using Citations Checking of Undergraduate Honors Thesis Bibliographies to Evaluate Library Collections. College & Research Libraries, 66(5), 417-429.

30.

Magnus, P. D. 2008. Early Response to False Claims in Wikipedia. First Monday, 13(9). [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.] <http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2115/2027>

31.

Malone, D., and Videon, C. 1997. Assessing Undergraduate Use of Electronic Resources:A Quantitative Analysis of Works Cited. Research Strategies, 15(3), 151-158.

32.

Mesgari, M. et al. 2015. The Sum of All Human Knowledge: A Systematic Review of Scholarly Research on the Content of Wikipedia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 219-245.

33.

Mill, D. H. 2008. Undergraduate Information Resource Choices. College & Research Libraries, 69(4), 342-355.

34.

Oakleaf, M. 2012. Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report. Chigago, IL: American Library Association. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.]<http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/val_report.pdf>

35.

Rector, L. 2008. Comparison of Wikipedia and Other Encyclopedias for Accuracy, Breadth, and Depth in Historical Articles. Reference services review, 36(1), 7-22.

36.

Robinson, A. M., and Schlegl, K. 2004. Student Bibliographies Improve When Professors Provide Enforceable Guidelines for Citations. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(2):275-290. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.]<https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v004/4.2robinson.pdf>

37.

Selegean, J. C., Thomas, M. L., and Richman, M. L. 1983. Long-Range Effectiveness of Library Use Instruction. College & Research Libraries, 44(6), 476-480.

38.

Smith, E. T. 2003. Assessing Collection Usefulness: An Investigation of Library Ownership of the Resources Graduate Students Use. College & Research Libraries, 64(5), 344-355.

39.

Sylvia, M. J. 1998. Citation Analysis as an Unobtrusive Method for Journal Collection Evaluation Using Psychology Student Research Bibliographies. Collection Building, 17(1):20-28.

40.

Wilson, E. K. 2012. Citation Analysis of Undergraduate Honors Thesis. The Southeastern Librarian, 60(1), 39-50.

41.

Wang, R. 2006. The Lasting Impact of a Library Credit Course. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1), 79-92.

42.

Wong, S. H. R., and Cmor, D. 2011. Measuring Association between Library Instruction and Graduation GPA. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 464-473. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 31.] <http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/5/464.full.pdf+html>

43.

Yu, F., Sullivan, J., and Woodall, L. 2006. What Can Students’ Bibliographies Tell Us?:Evidence Based Information Skills Teaching for Engineering Students. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 1(2), 12-22.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책