Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.58)
- 2023 (Vol.57)
- 2022 (Vol.56)
- 2021 (Vol.55)
- 2020 (Vol.54)
- 2019 (Vol.53)
- 2018 (Vol.52)
- 2017 (Vol.51)
- 2016 (Vol.50)
- 2015 (Vol.49)
- 2014 (Vol.48)
- 2013 (Vol.47)
- 2012 (Vol.46)
- 2011 (Vol.45)
- 2010 (Vol.44)
- 2009 (Vol.43)
- 2008 (Vol.42)
- 2007 (Vol.41)
- 2006 (Vol.40)
- 2005 (Vol.39)
- 2004 (Vol.38)
- 2003 (Vol.37)
- 2002 (Vol.36)
A Research on Citation Order of Classification Scheme and Its’ Application
Abstract
For the effective classification of complex subjects, a library classification scheme should adopt multiple division principles (or facets). Each of the multiple principles adopted for the division of complex subjects is sequentially applied at each stage of division. The order of application of these multiple principles during the process of division of complex subjects is called citation order. In order for a classification scheme to be consistent and logical, the citation order of division principles applied to classify complex subjects should be concrete and consistent. Especially, in case of enumerative classification system, decisions on citation order to represent complex subjects significantly affect the structure and organization of the classification system. There are basic principles and theoretical canons of the classification theory on the citation order and its application, but they cannot be applied solidly in the process of classification system development for practical reasons. Therefore, this paper first reviews previous works on classification theories regarding citation order, then explores the conditions and circumstances for the application of citation order.
- keywords
- 분류, 분류체계, 열거식 분류체계, 지식조직, 인용순, 주제전개순, 분류이론, 분류원칙, 분류규범, Classification, Classification Scheme, Enumerative Classification System, Knowledge Organization, Citation Order, Classification Theory, Citation Order, Canon of Classification
Reference
American National Standards Institute. 2005. Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. Baltimore, Maryland: National Information Standards Organization.
Batley, S. 2014. Classification in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Buchanan, B. 1979. Theory of Library Classification. New York: K.G. Saur.
Myall, C., and Carter, R. C. 1998. Portraits in Cataloging and Classification: Theorists, Educators, and Practitioners of the Late Twientieth Century. New York: Haworth Press.
Chan, L. M., and Hodges, T. 2007. Cataloging and Classification: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Dewey, M. 2011. Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index. 23rd ed. Dublin, Ohio:Online Computer Library Center.
Foskett, A. C. 1982. The Subject Approach to Information. London: Clive Bingley LTD.
Gilchrist, Alan. 2012. Facets of Knowledge Organization. In Proceedings of the ISKO UK Second Biennial Conference, July 4th-5th, 2011, London.
Kumar, K. 1981. Theory of Classification. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
Maltby, A. 1975. Sayers’ Manual of Classification for Librarians. London: Trinity Press.
Online Computer Library Center. 2015. Dewey Decimal Classification Glossary. [online][cited 2016. 1. 25.]<http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/glossary/dewey.en.html#C>
Online Computer Library Center. 2016. Webdewey. [online] [cited 2016. 2. 20.]<http://www.dewey.org/webdewey/standardSearch.html>
Ranganathan, S. R. 1967. Prolegomena to Library Classification. New York: Asia Publishing House.
Riaz, M. 1989. Advanced Indexing and Abstracting Practices. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.
Vickery, B. C. 1960. Faceted Classification: A Guide to Construction and use of special schemes. London: Aslib.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations