바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.50 No.4
Citation Share

A Case Study of U.S. Academic Libraries’ Research Data Support Services

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.4, pp.311-332
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311

(2016). A Case Study of U.S. Academic Libraries’ Research Data Support Services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 311-332, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Academic libraries have actively responded to social requirements and changes in scholarly communication system. In recent years, social and scholarly requirements for systematic management and sharing of research data have become apparent. Major countries including U.S., UK and Australia have begun national policies requiring management and sharing of research data from publicly funded R&D projects. This case study identified four academic libraries in the US with active research data support services and analyzed them in terms of how they established dedicated unit and the extent of services in the areas of instruction, consulting and system support. The analysis provides context for academic libraries in Korea in formulating their future research data strategies. The core of the recommendation is primarily concerned with developing instructional services and strengthening library’s capabilities for research data management and sharing.

keywords
Research Data, Data Management, Academic Libraries, United States, Case Study, 연구데이터, 데이터관리, 대학도서관, 미국, 사례분석

Reference

1.

강희종. 2012. 21세기 핵심자원, 국가과학데이터 활용을 위한 정책 과제. STEPI Insight, 91:1-26.

2.

김선태 외. 2010. 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4), 81-93.

3.

김은정, 남태우. 2012. 연구데이터 수집에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 29(2):27-44.

4.

김지현. 2012. 대학 내 연구자들의 연구데이터 관리에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 43(3):433-455.

5.

김지현. 2013. 국외 정부연구비지원기관의 연구데이터 관리정책 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3):251-274.

6.

신영란, 정연경. 2012. 국내 인문사회 연구데이터 아카이브의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 93-115.

7.

신은자. 2015. 디지털 시대 오픈 데이터 정책의 현황과 과제. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 49-68.

8.

Briney, K., Goben, A. and Zilinski, L. 2015. Do You Have An Institutional Data Policy? A Review of the Current Landscape of Library Data Services and Institutional Data Policies.Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(2): eP1232.

9.

Candela, L. et al. 2015. Data Journals: A Survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1747-1762.

10.

Gold, A. 2007. Cyberinfrastructure, Data, and Libraries, Part 2: Libraries and the Data Challenge: Roles and Actions for Libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). [online] [cited 2016. 10. 5.] <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt2.html>

11.

Gold, A. 2010. Data Curation and Libraries: Short Term Developments, Long-Term Prospects.Prepared for the 2009 AGU Fall Meeting, December 14th-18th, San Francisco, CA: Moscone Convention Center: 1-33. [online] [cited 2016. 10. 5.]<http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/lib_dean/27>

12.

Goldman, J., Kafel, D. and Martin, E. R. 2015. Assessment of Data Management Services at New England Region Resource Libraries. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 4(1): e1068. <http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1068>

13.

Jones, S. 2012. Developments in Research Funder Data Policy. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 114-125. [online] [cited 2016. 10. 4.]<http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/209>

14.

Lage, K., Losoff, B. and Maness, J. 2011. Receptivity to Library Involvement in Scientific Data Curation: A Case Study at the University of Colorado Boulder. Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), 915-937.

15.

Mischo, W. H., Schlembach, M. C. and O'Donnell, M. N. 2014. An Analysis of Data Management Plans in University of Illinois National Science Foundation Grant Proposals. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 3(1): e1060.

16.

OECD. 2007. OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. [online] [cited 2016. 9. 29.] <http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf>

17.

Raboin, R., Reznik-Zellen, R. C. and Salo, D. 2013. Forging New Service Paths: Institutional Approaches to Providing Research Data Management Services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(3): e1021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2012.1021>

18.

RCUK. 2015. RCUK Common Principles on Data Policy. [online] [cited 2016. 9. 27.]<http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/datapolicy/>

19.

Reznik-Zellen, R. C., Adamick, J. and McGinty, S. 2012. Tiers of Research Data Support Services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(1): e1002. <http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2012.1002>

20.

Tenopir, C. et al. 2014. Research Data Management Services in Academic Research Libraries and Perceptions of Librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 36(2), 84-90. [online] [cited 2016. 10. 4.] <http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/107>

21.

Weller, T. and Monroe-Gulick, A. 2015. Differences in the Data Practices, Challenges, and Future Needs of Graduate Students and Faculty Members. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 4(1): e1070. <http://dx.doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1070>

22.

Witt, M. et al. 2009. Constructing Data Curation Profiles. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(3), 93-103. <http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/137>

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy