바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.52 No.1

Citation Share

A Preliminary Research Study for Empirical Analysis on the Validity of Public Lending Right: Focus on the Comparison between Popular Borrowing Books and Best Sellers

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2018, v.52 no.1, pp.179-202
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.179

(2018). A Preliminary Research Study for Empirical Analysis on the Validity of Public Lending Right: Focus on the Comparison between Popular Borrowing Books and Best Sellers. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(1), 179-202, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.179

Abstract

The public lending right is a system in which government provide compensation to authors on the premise that the sale of books is reduced due to the book borrowing of the library. Recently, the claim that the public lending right should be introduced in Korea has been continuously raised by the authors. This study was conducted as part of the basic work to demonstrate whether the claims of public lending right are based on reasonable premises. The library’s popular lending books and bookstore bestseller books were compared to analyze the similarities and differences. Through this process, we derive necessary factors to prove the validity of the introduction of the public lending right and suggest follow - up study. In addition, we recalled the social meaning of book lending in libraries.

keywords
공공대출보상권, 공공대출권, 저작권, 도서관, 베스트셀러, Public Lending Right, Copyright, Library, Best Sellers

Reference

1.

권재열. 2013. 이른바 ‘공공대출권’의 도입에 관한 법경제학적 논고. 법학 논총, 20(1), 95-122.

2.

노래방 노래는 저작권료 꼬박꼬박 주면서 책은 왜 공짜로 빌려보나. 2017. 『시빅뉴스』. 9월 30일. [online] [cited 2017. 12. 30.]<http://www.civicnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=10265>

3.

도서관 책 대출 때 저작권료 지불 둘러싸고 갑론을박. 2017. 『파이낸셜뉴스』. 3월 28일. [online][cited 2017. 12. 28.] <http://www.fnnews.com/news/201703281709573434>

4.

본인 책이 얼마나 대출되는지 궁금한 작가들: 어린이책 작가들이 대여저작권 찾기에 나선 이유. 2017. 『오마이뉴스』. 11월 28일. [online] [cited 2017. 12. 30.]<http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002379910>

5.

유미숙. 2002. 『전자도서관의 활성화를 위한 저작권법제도의 개선방향』. 석사학위논문, 연세대학교법무대학원.

6.

이순자. 1995. 공공대출권과 저작권. 계간 저작권, 32, 15-34.

7.

이종엽. 2011. 『베스트셀러와 도서관 대출과의 상관관계분석: 공공도서관과 대학도서관을 대상으로』. 박사학위논문, 경기대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과.

8.

이호신. 2002. 『인터넷 시대의 도서관에서의 저작권 문제에 관한 연구』. 석사학위논문, 연세대학교법무대학원 저작권법전공.

9.

이흥용, 김영석. 2015. 공공대출보상권 제도의 운영에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 46(4), 355-377.

10.

정현태. 2002. 공공대출권 보상제도의 운영 현황과 대응방안 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 33(4), 19-35.

11.

최준란. 2017. 저작권 보호를 위한 공공대출권(PLR) 연구. 글로벌문화콘텐츠, 30: 181-197.

12.

한국저작권위원회. 『한국저작권위원회홈페이지』. [online] [cited 2017. 12. 30.]<http://www.copyright.or.kr>

13.

Cole, J. Y. 1983. “Public Lending Right: A Symposium at the Library of Congress.” LC Information Bulletin, 42: 427-432.

14.

International Federation of Library Association (IFLA). IFLA Homepage. [online] [cited 2017. 12. 10.] <http://www.ifla.org>

15.

Public Lending Right (PLR) International. PLR International Homepage. [online] [cited 2017. 12. 10.] <https://www.plrinternational.com>

16.

Stave, T. 1981. Public Lending Right: A History of the Idea. Library Trends, 29(4), 569-582.

17.

中瀬大樹. 2012. 公立図書館における書籍の貸出が売上に与える影響について,. 修士論文, 政策研究大学院大学 知財プログラム․

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy