바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.52 No.3
Citation Share

Research Productivity and Citation Performance of Researchers by Co-authorship Type in the Biological Sciences

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2018, v.52 no.3, pp.149-169
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.3.149

(2018). Research Productivity and Citation Performance of Researchers by Co-authorship Type in the Biological Sciences. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(3), 149-169, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.3.149
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis on the research productivity and the research performance of the School of Biological Sciences’ faculty at the S University by their co-authorships and further to identify any difference in the citedness by their co-authorships. For the years 2004-2013, a total of 1,135 publications, published by thirty-nine faculty members, were collected and their publication patterns were analyzed by co-authorships. For the years 2004-2016, the citations to the 1,135 publications were analyzed by co-authorships. Among the four co-authorship types, the total number of publications by the domestic and international co-authorships amounted to 832(73.3%), and the study also found a statistical difference in the citation performance, i.e., the average number of citations per paper by co-authorships (F =4.830, p=0.003**).

keywords
연구생산성, 연구성과, 인용성과, 공동연구, 생명과학, Research Productivity, Research Performance, Citation Performance, Co-authorship, Collaboration, Biological Sciences

Reference

1.

교육과학기술부. 2011. 『2010 과학기술연감』. 서울: 한국과학기술기획평가원.

2.

과학기술정보통신부. 2018. 『2017 과학기술연감』. 서울: 한국과학기술기획평가원.

3.

김홍렬. 2005. 생명과학 학술지의 인용분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3), 85-102.

4.

미래창조과학부. 2016. 『2015년 생명공학백서』. 대전: 생명공학정책연구센터.

5.

유소영, 이재윤. 2008. 학제적 분야의 정보서비스를 위한 학술지 인용분석에 관한 연구: Y대학교생명공학과를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 283-308.

6.

Bordons, M. et al. 1996. Local, Domestic and International Scientific Collaboration in Biomedical Research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.

7.

Harirchi, G., Melin, G., and Etemad, S. 2007. An Exploratory Study of the Feature of Iranian Co-authorships in Biology, Chemistry and Physics. Scientometrics, 72(1), 11-24.

8.

Journal Citation Reports. 2018. Web of Science. Thomson Reuters. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 30.]<http://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com.ymlproxy.yonsei.ac.kr:8000/JCRHomePageAction.acti on?>

9.

Kim, M. 2007. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Effectiveness of Korea’s Biotechnology Stimulation Plans, with a Comparison with Four Other Asian Nations. Scientometrics, 72(3), 371-388.

10.

Krauskopf, M., Vera, M. I., and Albertini, R. 1995. Assessment of A University’s Scientific Capabilities and Profile: The Case of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile. Scientometrics, 34(1), 87-100.

11.

Lee, C. K. 2003. A Scientometric Study of the Research Performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Scientometrics, 56(1), 95-110.

12.

Moed, H. F. et al. 1991. International Scientific Co-operation and Awareness within the European community: Problems and Perspectives. Scientometrics, 21, 291-311.

13.

Moed, H. F. 2000. Bibliometric Indicators Reflect Publication and Management Strategies. Scientometrics, 47(2), 323-346.

14.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009. The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda. Paris: OECD.

15.

Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B., and Martín-Sempere, M. J. 2006. Scientists’Performance and Consolidation of Research Teams in Biology and Biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Scientometrics, 69(2), 183-212.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy