바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.53 No.3

Citation Share

사회자본과 공유경제의 매개체로서의 공공도서관의 역할

The Role of Public Libraries as a Mediator between Social Capital and Sharing Economy

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2019, v.53 no.3, pp.121-141
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.121
이승민 (중앙대학교)
박종도 (인천대학교)
이승민, & 박종도. (2019). 사회자본과 공유경제의 매개체로서의 공공도서관의 역할. 한국문헌정보학회지, 53(3), 121-141, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.121

초록

이 연구에서는 사회의 새로운 패러다임으로 정착하고 있는 사회자본과 공유경제의 특성을 분석하고, 이들을 매개하여 전체적인 사회적 편익을 보다 효율적으로 도모하기 위한 공공도서관의 사회적 역할을 설문조사를 통해 고찰하였다. 상관분석과 위계적 다중회귀분석을 통해 분석한 결과, 사회자본과 공유경제는 상호작용이 이루어지는 사회적 현상이며, 공공도서관은 사회자본의 형성 및 공유경제에 대한 참여에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 사회자본과 공유경제를 매개하는 공공도서관의 역할 측면에서는, 공공도서관에서 제공하는 다양한 프로그램들이 사회자본과 공유경제를 매개하는데 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다.

keywords
사회자본, 공유경제, 공공도서관, 휴먼 네트워크, Social Capital, Sharing Economy, Public Library, Human Network

Abstract

This research analyzed the characteristics of social capital and sharing economy, which are the new paradigm in the development of the entire society. In addition, it identified the social roles of a public library as a mediator that promotes the social benefit by conducting a survey questionnaire. As the results of the analysis through correlation analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis, social capital and sharing economy are the co-related societal phenomenon, and public libraries positively effect on the construction of social capital and the participation in sharing economy. From the perspective of the roles of a public library as a mediator between social capital and sharing economy, it was identified that various programs provided by public libraries positively effect on mediating social capital and sharing economy.

keywords
사회자본, 공유경제, 공공도서관, 휴먼 네트워크, Social Capital, Sharing Economy, Public Library, Human Network

참고문헌

1.

심홍진, 황유선. 2010. 마이크로블로깅 서비스와 사회자본: 트위터 초기사용자 집단을 중심으로. 『한국언론학보』, 54(5): 327-347.

2.

윤미선, 이종혁. 2012. 소셜미디어 이용에 영향을 미치는 요인과 사회자본에 대한 연구: 계획된행동 이론을 적용한 매개모델 분석. 『방송과 커뮤니케이션』, 13(2): 5-44.

3.

이승민. 2018. 공공도서관 이용을 통한 정보공유가 사회자본 형성에 미치는 영향. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 52(4): 27-49.

4.

최윤정. 2008. 대중 매체 이용이 사회자본에 영향을 미치는 경로 분석: 대인간 커뮤니케이션 매개모델 검증. 『한국언론학보』, 52(3): 374-395.

5.

Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. W. 2002. “Social Capital: Propspects for a New Concept.” Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.

6.

Bellotti, Victoria et al. 2015. “A muddle of models of motivation for using peer-to-peer economy systems.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea, 18-23 April 2015; pp.1085-1094.

7.

Böcker, Lars and Meelen, Toon. 2017. “Sharing for people, planet or profit?: Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23: 28-39.

8.

Botsman, R. and Rogers, R. 2010. What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. HarperBusiness: New York, NY, USA.

9.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The forms of capital. In J. Richardson(ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241-258.

10.

Burt, R. S. 2000. The Contingent Value of Social Capital. In E. L. Lesser (ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann, 255-285.

11.

Chung, G. W., Shim, J. M. and Choi, K. E. 2006. Social capital of the rural area and development of local society. Research Report R527. Korea Rural Economic Institute: Seoul, Korea.

12.

Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” The American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.

13.

Cusumano, Michael A. 2015. “How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy.”Communications of the ACM, 58(1): 32-34.

14.

Davis, Fred D. 1993. “User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3): 475-487.

15.

Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.

16.

Field, J. 2003. “Civic engagement and lifelong learning: Survey findings on social capital and attitudes towards learning.” Studies in the Education of Adults, 35, 142-156.

17.

Gansky, L. 2010. The Mesh: Why the future of business is sharing. New York, NY: Portfolio Penguin.

18.

Hamari, Juho, Mimmi Sjöklint and Antti Ukkonen. 2015. “The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9): 2014-2059.

19.

Ikkala, Tapio and Lampinen, Airi. 2015. “Monetizing network hospitality: Hospitality and sociability in the context of Airbnb.” In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 14-18 March 2015, 1033-1044.

20.

Ju, D. 2016. “Understanding about the relationship between sharing economy and social capital:Focusing on the consumption intentions of the sharing accommodation.” International Journal of Tourism Management, 31, 23-40.

21.

Lamberton, Cait Poynor and Rose, Randall L. 2012. “When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems.”Journal of Marketing, 76(4): 109-125.

22.

Lessig, Lawrence. 2008. Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

23.

Lin, N. 1999. “Social Networks and Status Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology, 25:467-487.

24.

Park, H. B. 2002. “Issues and research trends of social capital theory.” Journal of Governmental Studies, 8(1): 5-45.

25.

Paxton, P. 2002. “Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship.” American Sociological Review, 24: 1-24.

26.

Putnam, R. D. 1995. “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital.” Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78.

27.

Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

28.

Rifkin, Jeremy. 2001. The age of access: The new culture of hypercapitalism. New York, NY: TarcherPerigee.

29.

Sung, E., Kim, H. and Lee, D. 2018. “Why do people consume and provide sharing economy accommodation?: A sustainability perspective.” Sustainability, 2018, 10, 2072.

30.

Wang, Chih-Chien, YaHui Hsu and Wenchang Fang. 2005. “Acceptance of technology with network externalities: An empirical study of internet instant messaging services.” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(4). [online] [cited 2019. 6. 7.]<https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol6/iss4/4>

31.

Wietzman, Martin. 1984. The share economy: Conquering stagflation. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책