바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

IT 신제품 개발 팀의 팀 심성모형 측정과 팀 효과성

Measuring Team Mental Model and Team Effectiveness

초록

개인 수준에서 주로 다뤄진 인지 개념이 최근 팀 심성모형이라는 개념하에 집단 수준에서의 현상으로 연구되고 있는데, 이는 팀원간 상호작용을 촉진시켜 팀 효과성을 높일 것으로 기대된다. 지금까지 팀 심성모형에 관한 이론적 연구는 꾸준히 진행되어 왔지만 실증 연구는 매우 미흡한 실정이다. 특히 팀 심성모형이 지식근로자 팀에서 매우 중요함에도 불구하고 측정의 어려움 때문에 연구가 진행되지 못한 문제가 있었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 팀 심성모형의 개념을 이론적 측면에서 체계적으로 살펴본 후 보다 정교하고 객관적인 방법으로 팀 심성모형을 측정하였다. 아울러 팀 심성모형과 팀 효과성의 연관성을 실증적으로 분석해보기 위해 IT 관련 신제품 개발 팀을 대상으로 자료를 수집하였다. 분석결과 팀 심성모형이 팀 효과성의 세 차원인 팀 성과, 팀 혁신행동, 및 팀 학습효과에 정(+)적인 영향을 주었다. 특히 팀 성과의 경우는 팀 심성모형이 전문가 집단의 지식구조와 유사할수록 팀 성과가 촉진되는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 연구결과가 갖는 관리적 시사점과 연구의 한계점을 논의하였다.

keywords
팀 심성모형, 전문가 집단 지식구조, 팀 성과, 팀 혁신행동, 팀 학습효과, team mental model, knowledge structure of an expert group, team performance, team innovative behavior, team learning effect, team mental model, knowledge structure of an expert group, team performance, team innovative behavior, team learning effect

Abstract

Cognitive ability at individual level has been recently studied at group level and labeled as team mental model. Team mental model is expected to improve team effectiveness as it facilitates interactions among team members. In contrast to the continued efforts in developing theoretical models of team mental model, empirical studies are meager. Especially difficulty in measurement has been the major obstacle in conducting empirical studies in spite of the importance of team mental model in understanding the teams of knowledge workers. This study suggests various measurement technique about team mental model and measure it by an elaborate Pathfinder algorithm. We conducted an empirical study to investigate the role of a team mental model on team effectiveness. A total of 121 new product development teams in the IT industry were surveyed for the data collection. We obtained results showing that team mental model has positive influence on team performance, team innovative behavior and team learning effect. Especially, the relationship between team mental model and team performance seems to be mediated by the similarity of knowledge structure among the expert as an intervening variable.

keywords
팀 심성모형, 전문가 집단 지식구조, 팀 성과, 팀 혁신행동, 팀 학습효과, team mental model, knowledge structure of an expert group, team performance, team innovative behavior, team learning effect, team mental model, knowledge structure of an expert group, team performance, team innovative behavior, team learning effect

참고문헌

1.

(2001) 전문 판매원의 성과 수준에 따른 지식구조 차이 연구 산업 및 조직,

2.

(2003) 공유 멘탈모델의 선행요인에 관한 실증연구 ,

3.

(2003) 지식근로자 팀 효과성의 선행요인 구성원의 인지적 유사성 vs 속인적 유사성 지식경영연구,

4.

(2004) 조직구성원의 지식구조 분석을 위한 구조적 표상의 응용 산업 및 조직,

5.

(2002) 게임프로그래머, 웹 프로그래머, 시스템 엔지니어의 직무분석 , 시스템 엔지니어의 직무분석

6.

(2002) 인터넷 컨텐츠 개발, 소프트웨어 엔지니어, 시스템 분석설계의 직무분석 , 시스템 분석설계의 직무분석

7.

(1990) Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style Journal of Creative Behavior,

8.

(1987) Practical issues in structural modeling,

9.

(1994) The engine of renewal,

10.

(1993) Shared Mental Models in Expert Team Decision Making 221-246 In Castellan,

11.

(2001) Reflections on Shared Cognition ,

12.

(1997) Extracting team mental models through textual analysis,

13.

(1991) and management in the world auto industry, Harvard Business School Press

14.

(2000) Measuring team knowledge.,

15.

(1999) An organizational learning framework:from intuition to institution,

16.

(1990) Assessing structural similarity of graphs Studies in knowledge organization,

17.

(1996) From chimneys to cross-functional teams Academy of Management Journal,

18.

(1990) Graphs in the social and psychological sciences Empirical contributions of Pathfinder Studies in Knowledge organization,

19.

(1998) Measuring mental models for teamwork at the individual-and team-level Paper presented at the 13th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,

20.

(1992) The analysis of cause maps Journal of Management Studies,

21.

(1991) Assessing structural knowledge,

22.

(1997) Applications of structural knowledge assessment to training evaluation , Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

23.

(2003) Shared mental models and team performance: Are you thinking what we're thinking?,

24.

(1995) An empirical investigation of mental models in team performance Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,

25.

(1990) The recognition of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms,

26.

(2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects,

27.

(1995) Writing about structural equation models,

28.

(1983) Multidimensional models of social perception,

29.

(1988) and social conditions for innovation in organization Research in Organization Behavior,

30.

(1994) Construct or Metaphor? Journal of Management,

31.

(1996) Construct validation of multiple measure of shared mental models ,

32.

(1997) Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models Indicators of Team Effectiveness, & Prince Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc

33.

(2000) Analyzing shared and team mental models. ,

34.

(2001) Cognitive divergence & shared mental models in software development project teams Journal of Organizational Behavior,

35.

(1994) How to integrate work and deepen expertise,

36.

(1998) From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge New Product Development as Knowledge Management Journal of Marketing,

37.

(2000) The Influence of Shared Mental Models on Team Process and Performance Journal of Applied Psychology,

38.

(1995) Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,

39.

(2000) The Measurement of Team Mental Models,

40.

(2001) Team mental models in a team knowledge framework Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries Journal of Organizational Behavior,

41.

(1995) How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, The knowledge- creating company Oxford University Press

42.

(2000) A theory of organizational knowledge creation Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge Handbook of Organizational Learning, Oxford University Press

43.

(1999) In Shared Cognition in Organizations The Management of knowledge, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

44.

(1994) Members of great teams think alike:A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members,

45.

(1986) On Looking into the Black Box Prospects and Limits in the search for Mental Models,

46.

(1992) Critical Factors for the 1990s,

47.

(1990) Studies on knowledge organization,

48.

(1985) Measuring the structure of expertise International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,

49.

(1994) Determinants of Innovative Behavior A Path model of individual innovation in the workplace Academy of Management Journal,

50.

(1983) Applications of multidimensional scaling in cognitive psychology,

51.

(2001) Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment Journal of Organizational Behavior,

52.

(1999) Fostering the development of shared teamwork knowledge structures through computer-based instruction Paper presented at the 14th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,

53.

(1988) Knowledge structure differences between more effective and less effective salespeople Journal of Marketing Research,

54.

(1996) The firm as a distributed knowledge system:A constructionist approach,

55.

(1998) The relation of knowledge organization to performance of a complex cognitive task,

logo