바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Cognitive Task Analysisof Air Traffic Controller's Flight Risk Assessment

Abstract

This study carried out an exploratory investigation of the risk assessment of Air Traffic Controllers. Analysis of data showed that the risk assessment was different based on expertise, gender, work experience, and the perception of critical factors for job efficiency and safety. ATCs evaluated the flight situation less riskier when they had experience, knowledge, training, or procedures. the perception of critical factors for job correlated with risk assessment. The results of multi-dimensional scaling analysis indicated that the main dimension of risk assessment on flight situations was complexity of situation and coping strategy. This dimension appeared across all variables. However, the other dimensions differed based on expertise, gender, and work experience.

keywords
Risk Perception, Risk Assessment, Air Traffic Controller, Expert, Gender difference, Experience, Risk Perception, Risk Assessment, Air Traffic Controller, Expert, Gender difference, Experience, 위험지각, 관제사, 전문가, 성차, 경험, 위험평가

Reference

1.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.

2.

Fisher, U., Orasanu, J., & Wich. M. (1995). Expert pilots' perceptions of problem situations. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, April 1995, Columbus, OH, 777-872.

3.

Gustafson, P. E. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18, 805-811.

4.

Hunter, D. R. (2002). Risk perception and risk tolerance in aircraft pilots. Technical report, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Washington, DC.

5.

Hunter, D. R. (2006). Risk perception among general aviation pilots. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16, 135-144.

6.

Kraus, N., Malmfors T., & Slovic P. (1992). Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgements of chemical risks. Risk Analysis, 12, 215-232

7.

Lazo J. K., Kinnell J. C., Fisher A. (2000). Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20, 179-193.

8.

McDaniels, T., Axelrod, L., Cavanagh, N., and P. Slovic, (1997). Characterizing. Perception of Ecological Risks to Water Environments. Risk Analysis, 17, 341–352.

9.

McFadden, K. L., & Towell, E. R., (1999), Aviation Human Factors: A Framework for the New Millennium. Journal of Air Transport Management, 5, 177-184.

10.

O'Hare, D. (1990). Pilot's perception of risks and hazards in general aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 61, 599-603.

11.

Orasanu, J. M. (1994). Shared problem models and flight crew performance. Aviation Psychology in Practice. N. Johnston, N. McDonald and R. Fuller. Brookfield, Vermont, Ashgate Publishing Company. 255-285.

12.

Pelz, D. C., & Krupat, E. (1974). Caution profile and driving record of undergraduate males. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 45-58.

13.

Proctor, R. W., & Dutta, A. (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Ranney, T. A. (1994) Models of driving behavior: A review of their evolution. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 733-750.

15.

Royer, J. M., Cisero, C. A., & Carlo, M. S. (1993). Techniques and procedures for measuring cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63, 201-243.

16.

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27, 11-20.

17.

Thomson, M.E., D. Önkal, A.Avcıoğlu, and P. Goodwin (2004). “Aviation risk perception: A comparison between experts and novices”. Risk Analysis, 24, 1585-1595.

18.

Trankle U., Gelau C., Metker T. (1990). Risk perception and age-specific accidents of young drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 22, 119-125.

logo