바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The effects of hasteful behavior on performance speed and accuracy

Abstract

We define “hasteful behavior” as the action of accomplishing a optimal goal as well as possible while increasing the speed of the action to the greatest extent possible. Five factors influence hasteful behavior ;time-pressure, discomfort, isolation, boring-condition, and reward expectation. Hasteful behavior can be divided into “Missing Confirmation Domain” and “Need for Achievement Domain”. We investigated the 'Need for Achievement Domain' in hasteful behavior as related to time-pressure, boring-condition, and reward expectation. A total of 4 conditions were set according to the presence or absence of time pressure and reward expectation. The boring-condition was reflected to the task; therefore a ‘line-drawing task’ was set as the tedium task. 81 subjects performed the ‘line-drawing task’ for 30 min in compliance with same direction, and then repeated the task for 1 min under a direction as each condition. Time pressure resulted in increased task performance speed and reduced task performance accuracy. Also, time pressure and reward expectation had an interactive effect on task performance accuracy. According to the analysis of task performance based on reward expectation varied across presence or absence of time pressure, reward expectation appeared to increase accuracy. We discussed the results in the condition with time pressure and the reward expectation to show characteristics of “Need for Achievement Domain” in hasteful behavior.

keywords
Hasteful behavior, Need for achievement, Time pressure, Reward expectation Boring-condition, Performance Speed, Performance Accuracy, 서두름 행동, 성취욕구 영역, 시간압력, 보상기대, 지루함, 수행속도, 수행정확성

Reference

1.

서울방송 (2008). SBS 스페셜, 대한민국 건국 60주년 특집 2부작 ‘대한민국 기적의 열쇠’ 60년의 비밀의 문을 열다(8월 11일 방영).

2.

유창열 (1986). 성취동기 측정척도 개발. 충남대학교 공업교육연구소 논문집, 8(3), 10-16.

3.

이순열, 이순철 (2008). 운전 스트레스 척도(Driving Stress Sacle: DSS)의 개발과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(3), 21-40.

4.

이순철 (2001). 산업재해와 오류행동. 사회과학연구, 18(2), 231-250, 충북대학교 사회과학연구소.

5.

이순철, 박선진 (2007). 서두름의 심리적 구조. 2007 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 논문집, 512-513.

6.

이순철, 박선진 (2008). 서두름 행동의 심리적 구조 및 특성 파악: 서두름 행동, 확인생략행동, 성취욕구 간의 관계 이해. 한국심리학회:사회문제, 14(2), 63-82.

7.

이순철, 황윤숙, 오주석 (2008). 작업부하가 화물차운전자의 피로에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:산업및조직, 21(2), 367-381.

8.

최원범, 이재식 (2004). 운전자와 자동차 항법 시스템의 상호작용에 관한 연구: 시간압력과 시스템 메뉴구조의 효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업및조직, 17(1), 1-17.

9.

황윤숙, 오주석, 이순철 (2009). 시내버스 및 택시운전자의 작업부하가 피로에 미치는 영향과 부적정서상태의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지:산업및조직, 22(1), 87-108.

10.

Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive Negative Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation:The Myth Contitues. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 1-44.

11.

Chao, C. D., Madhavan, D., & Funk, K. (1996). Studies of cockpit task management errors. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 307-320.

12.

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.

13.

Edland, A. & Svenson, O. (1993). Time pressure and stress on human judgement and decision making. In O. Svenson and A. J. Maule(eds.). New York: Plenum Press.

14.

Melamed, S., Ben-Avi, I., Luz, J., & Green, M. S. (1995). Objective and subjective work monotony: Effects on job satisfaction, psychological distress, and absenteeism in blue-collar workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(1), 29-42.

15.

Raby, M. & Wickens, C. D. (1994). Strategic workload management and decision biases in aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 211-240.

16.

Slobounov, S. M., Fukada, K., Simon, R., Rearick, M., & Ray, W. (2000). Neurophysiological and behavioral indices of time pressure effects on visuomotor task performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 287-298.

17.

Schultz, D. P. & Schultz, S. E. (2008). 일과 심리학[Psychology and Work Today, 9/E]. (양윤, 이재식, 신강현 역). 서울: 박학사. (원전 2006년에 출판)

logo