바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Influence of Equity Sensitivity on cooperation intention: Moderation effect of cooperation/competition and exploring psychological process

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to find a possible answer for the inconsistent results of the relationship between the equity sensitivity and organizational citizenship behavior(OCB) in previous studies. Because OCB could be observed only in organizational context, cooperation intention, as a dependent variable, was used for the experiment. The data of 89 students, obtained by the experiment, were used for the analysis. The results showed that benevolents, who were highly cooperative, decreased the cooperation intention when others competed. In addition, even though we did not develop specific hypotheses, by using an survey gauging competition orientation, choice autonomy, egocentrism, fairness perception, rationality and justification on cooperation/competition of other, the differences between benevolents and entitileds, in terms of their attitudes and perception, were investigated. Based on the results, the psychological process of changing cooperation intention and future research were discussed.

keywords
형평성민감도, 협력, 경쟁, 협력의도, Equity sensitivity, Cooperation/Competition, Cooperation intention

Reference

1.

박승립 (2017). 형평성 민감도가 조직시민행동 및 지식공유에 미치는 영향: 협력/경쟁 맥락의 조절효과를 중심으로. 박사학위청구논문: 성균관대학교

2.

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.

3.

Akan, O. H., Allen, R. S., & White, C. S. (2009). Equity Sensitivity and Organizational Citizenship behavior in a team environment. Small Group Research, 40, 94-112.

4.

Balliet, D. B., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090-1112.

5.

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possession and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.

6.

Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 259-273.

7.

Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2009). Relative deprivation among employees in lower-quality leader-member exchange relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 276-286.

8.

De Cremer, D. D., & van Lange, P. A. M.(2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The role of social responsibility and reciprocity, European Journal of Personality, 15, s5-s18.

9.

DePaulo, B. M., & Fisher, J. D. (1980). The costs of asking for help. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(1), 23-35.

10.

Deustch, M. (1980). Over fifty years of conflict research. In L. Festinger(Ed.) Four decades of social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.

11.

Deustch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

12.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(23), 785-791.

13.

Ferrin, D., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust:Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14, 18-31.

14.

Fok, L. Y., Hartman, S. J., Patti, A. L., & Razek, J. R. (2000). The relationship between equity sensitivity, growth need strength, organizational citizenship behavior, and perceived outcomes in the quality environment: A study of accounting professionals. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 99-120.

15.

Fok, L. Y., Hartman, S. J., Villere, M. F., &Freibert, R. C. (1996). A study of the impact of cross culture differences on perceptions of equity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Management, 13, 3-14.

16.

Gonzalez-Mute, E., DeGeest, D. S., McCormick, Seong, J. Y. & Brown, K. G. (2014). Can we get some cooperation around here? The mediating role of group norms on the relationship between team personality and individual helping behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 988-999.

17.

Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen(Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior(pp. 389-435). New York: Academic Press.

18.

Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen(Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior(pp. 437-469). New York: Academic Press.

19.

Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation:A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 517-534.

20.

Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 1031-1057.

21.

Hertel, G., Neuhoff, J., Theuer, T., & Kerr, N. L. (2000). Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Cognitive and Emotion, 14, 441-472.

22.

Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055-1064.

23.

Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory:The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222-234.

24.

Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperations' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 66-91.

25.

Kerr, J., & Slocum, Jr., J. W. (2005). Managing corporate culture through reward systems. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 130-138.

26.

Kerr, N. L., & Parks, E. S. (2003). Group performance in collaborative and social dilemma tasks: Progress and Prospects. In M. A. Hogg &S. Tindale(Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. MA: Blackwell Publisher(Ltd.).

27.

Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., & Posig, M. (2005). Does trust matter? The relationship between Equity Sensitivity and perceived organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 205-218.

28.

King, W. C., & Hinson, T. D. (1994). The influence of sex and equity sensitivity on relationship of opponent, and outcomes in a negotiation experiment. Journal of Management, 20(3), 605-624.

29.

King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 133-142.

30.

King, W. C., Miles, E. W., & Day, D. D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317.

31.

Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214.

32.

Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpretational relations: Mixed motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.

33.

Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253-266.

34.

Konovosky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656-669.

35.

Krueger, J. I., DiDonato, T. E., & Freestone, D. (2012). Social Projection Can Solve Social Dilemmas. Psychological Inquiry, 23(1), 1-27.

36.

Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers' vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 543-554.

37.

Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 810-825.

38.

Lee, F. (1997). When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(3), 336-363.

39.

Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M., & Suhre, C. J. M. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimenttla Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.

40.

Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadermember exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 697-708.

41.

Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., & Huseman, R. C., (1994). Equity sensitivity and outcome importance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 585-596.

42.

Mowday, R. T. (1983). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter(Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (3rd ed., pp. 91-113). NY: McGraw- Hill.

43.

Mudrack, P. E., Mason, E. S., & Stepanski, K. M. (1999). Equity sensitivity and business ethics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 539-560.

44.

Nelissen, R. M. A., Dijker, A. J. M., & deVries, N. K. (2007). How to turn a hawk into a dove and vice versa: Interactions between emotions and goals in a give-some dilemma game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 280-286.

45.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.

46.

Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum &Associates.

47.

Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.

48.

Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363, 392.

49.

Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.

50.

Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306-1314.

51.

Sattler, D. N. & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might versus morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.

52.

Sauley, K. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26(5), 855-910.

53.

Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264-268.

54.

Sinclair, A. L. (2003). The effects of justice and cooperation on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 34, 74-100.

55.

Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., Van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2003). Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistencty of social valu orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 972-987.

56.

Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (2005). Competitin, cooperation, and the effects of others on me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 1029-1038.

57.

Tjosvold, D., Andrews, R., & Jones, H. (1983). Cooperative and competitive relationship between leaders and subordinates. Human Relations, 36, 1111-1124.

58.

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical Individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118-128.

59.

Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and quality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337-349.

60.

van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125-141.

61.

Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the Might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Paychology, 67(1), 126-141.

62.

Van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1991). Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal-prescribesrationality principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 273-292.

63.

Van Lange, P. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (2012). Interdependence theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins, (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 251-272). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

64.

Vecchio, R. P. (2005). Exploration in employee envy: Feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 69-81.

65.

Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studied of individualism-Collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 152-172.

66.

Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provisioning of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110-116.

logo