open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0696
The purpose of this study was to validate the Thriving at Work Scale(TWS) developed by Porath and colleagues(2012) in Korea. Specifically, the study was attempted to (1) examine the factor structure and items of the TWS to develop the Korean version of the TWS(TWS-K), and (2) investigate the discriminant validity of the TWS-K with the 5 similar concepts proposed only conceptually in the literature(job engagement, flow, resilience, flourishing, psychological well-being) as well as the incremental validity of the TWS-K over job engagement on performance. Two surveys were conducted for this purpose, and a total of 850 employees working at different fields in Korea participated in off-line or on-line survey. In Study 1, we conducted both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using the off-line data of 205 participants. The results showed that the factor structure of vitality and learning composed of positive 10 items in the TWS-K had a better fit compared to the original positive 8 and negative 2 items included in the TWS. It was also found that the reliability of the TWS-K was much higher than that of the TWS among Koreans. In Study 2, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis on 645 on-line participants demonstrated the six-factor model which assumed the independence of 6 related factors had the best fit among 6 models, supporting the discriminant validity of the TWS-K. Support was also found for the criterion-related validity of the TWS-K on the various criteria of performance. In addition, the results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses confirmed that thriving at work is a distinct construct, as the incremental variances of thriving at work on task, contextual, and adaptive performance were significant when each of similar concepts such as jog engagement controlled. Finally the implications and future research directions were discussed based on the findings.
고득영, 유태용 (2012). 직무자율성과 혁신행동 간의 관계: 직무만족의 매개효과와 성격과 조직혁 신풍 토의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(1), 215-238.
권나영, 김민수, 오인수 (2016), 직무 자율성이 직무만족에 미치는 영향: 직무개선과 일 열의의 개인 내-개인간 다수준 매개효과를 중심으로, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(4), 573-590.
김도영, 유태용 (2002). 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직. 15(2), 1-24.
김명소, 김혜원 (2000). 우리나라 기혼여성들의 심리적 안녕감의 구조분석 및 주관적 안녕감과의 관계분석. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 5(1), 27-41.
김수안, 민경환 (2011). 탄력성 척도의 비교 및 탄력성과 정서적 특성과의 관계 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(5), 223- 243.
김주완, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식 모형으로 논문쓰기. 커뮤니케이션북스.
김희진, 정승철 (2016). 직장인의 직무스트레스가 번영에 미치는 영향: 회복행동을 통한 정서적 안정성의 조절된 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(3), 411-432.
박소희 (2016). 성격이 적응 수행에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구. 한국인적자원관리학회: 인적자원관리연구 23(3), 167-184.
신교수, 한태영 (2015). 직무열의와 생성감이 중장년 근로자 노후준비에 미치는 영향: 멘토링의 매개효과 및 성차의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 609-634.
오선영, 노상충, 강민우, 서용원 (2015). 변혁적 리더십과 인간존중의 조직문화에 의한 회복탄력성이 조직구성원의 행복감과 조직효과성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 829-854.
오선영, 서용원(2015). 대인갈등이 관계 손상에 미치는 영향에 대한 긍정 감정의 조절효과: 조절된 매개 모형. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 663∼688.
유치성, 손영우, 박인조 (2016), 자아탄력성, 감정 경험, 삶의 의미 및 직무만족의 구조적 관계 - 변혁적 리더십의 조절 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(2), 175- 201.
유성경, 심혜원 (2002). 적응 유연한 청소년들의 심리적 보호요소 탐색. 한국교육심리학회: 교육심리연구 16(4), 189-206.
유태용, 이채령 (2016). 성격이 과업수행과 적응수행에 미치는 영향: 직무가공의 매개효과와 리더 임파워링 행동의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(4), 607- 630.
이종구 (2010). 직무역량을 기반으로 한 관리직 분류의 적절성 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(4), 783-801.
이종만 (2014). 직장인의 주관적 안녕감에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 14(1), 400-408.
이태정 (2003). 몰입 경험이 진로 태도 성숙 및 진로 결정 효능감에 미치는 영향. 홍익대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문,
이학식, 임지훈 (2013). 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 20.0. 집현재.
임영재 (2015). 번영감의 선행영향요인과 효과성에 관한 실증연구. 충북대학교 경영학박사학위논문.
박상언, 김학수, 임영재 (2016). 번영감(Thriving at Work): 개념, 선행 영향요인, 그리고 효과성. 인사조직학회지: 인사조직연구, 24 (2), 155~184.
정승철 (2015), 번영척도(flourishing Scale)의 타당화 연구: 개인적 요인 및 직무관련 요인과의 관계 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(2), 135-145.
정예슬, 박지영, 손영우, 하유진 (2013), 직업가치 유형이 조직몰입에 미치는 차별적 영향: 직무열의, 직무만족의 매개효과와 개인-조직 적합성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 26(4), 507-532.
조영복, 주규하 (2013). 코칭행동이 조직구성원의 역할행동에 미치는 영향: 번영감의 매개효과. 대한경영학회지 경영학회, 26(10), 2711-2728.
최낙환 김영성 (2013). 판매종업원의 역할행동에 영향을 미치는 업무열의요인에 관한 연구. 한국산업경영학회: 경영연구, 28(4), 111~138.
최해수 (2016). 호텔기업 직무피드백 특성이 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 감성조절의 조절된 매개 효과. 대한관광경영학회지: 관광연구, 31(2), 223-242.
탁진국, 서형준, 김혜선, 남동엽, 정희정, 권누리, 김소영, 정일진 (2015), 일의 의미 척도개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직. 28(1), 437-456.
탁진국, 서형준, 원용재, 심현주 (2017). 일의 의미척도 구성타당도 검증: 직장인을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 30 (3), 357-372.
탁진국, 이은주, 임그린 (2015). 경력적응성 척도의 타당화 검증. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 591∼608.
한태영 (2004). 직무수행의 3요인 모형: 과제수행, 맥락수행, 및 적응수행 요인. 한국심리학회, 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 234- 235.
홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 85-104.
Brown, D., Arnold, R., Fletcher, D. & Standage, M. (2017). Human thriving: A conceptual debate and literature review. European Psychologist, 22(3). 167-179.
Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 245-266.
Carmeli, A. & Spreitzer G. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
Campbell J. P. & Wiernile B. M. (2015). The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology. 2, 47-74.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of good- ness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. Assessing wellbeing: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 3), 247-266. New York, NY: Springer.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas- Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143- 156.
Epel, E. S., McEwen, B. S., & Ickovics, J. R. (1998). Embodying psychological thriving: Physical thriving in response to stress. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 301-322.
Gagne, D. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
Gerbasi, A., Porath, C. L., Parker, A., Spreitzer, G., & Cross, R. (2015). Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1423-1433.
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077-1096.
Kocak Ӧ. E., (2016). How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust. Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 5(4), 40-52.
Levy R., Milner. K. (2016). The role of implicit person theories and psychological capital in workplace thriving. A research report, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 40, 370-396.
Niessen, C., Sonnentag, S., & Sach, F. (2012). Thriving at work - A diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 468-487.
Nimon, K. Reio, T. G. (2011). Regression commonality analysis: a technique for quantitative theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3).
Nix, G., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 266-284.
Paterson T. A. (2014). The institutional logics of rigor and relevance: An analysis of the rigor-relevance relationship and its impact on management research legitimacy. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3617435.
Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 434-446.
Peens M.(2017). No best before date: Thriving at work during late career. Ph.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10257672.
Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 250-275.
Prem R., Ohly S., Kubicek B., & Korunka C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 108-123.
Rogers, C. (1961), On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. London: Constable.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demand, job resource, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25. 293-315.
Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000a). Positive psychology [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 55.
Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000b). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academic Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment: Academic Management Journal, 39, 483- 504.
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537-549.
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., (2007), Thriving in organizations. Positive Organizational Behavior, 74-85.
Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155-162.
Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. (2013). Self-Determination as Nutriment for Thriving: an Integrative Model of Human Growth at Work. For Publication in Gagne.
Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2016). A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42, 982-1004.