바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on Propriety Evaluation on Library Development Plan of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism with SMART Method

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2007, v.41 no.3, pp.165-179

Abstract

This study regards the evaluation for the main contents of the ‘Library Development Plan(2003-2011)’ promoted by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism for the library development plan in Korea. SMART evaluation method was introduced for the evaluation of vision, objective, core project of library development plan. Following result was acquired as a result of the study. First, as a result of SMART, vision, objective, core projects and main business of library development plan was presented to be 3.05, 3.09, 3.15 and 3.12 respectively. Thus, in the evaluation for components of development plan, it was excellent in core projects. Second, as a result of SMART, concreteness, measurability, achievability, relevance and time frame of library development plan was presented to be 3.09, 2.99, 3.12, 3.24 and 3.10 respectively. Thus, in the evaluation components of development plan, it was excellent in relevance but it has been found that supplementary measures should be taken on measurability. Third, ‘culture-oriented room with knowledge and information’ was found to be superior to the ‘information library with up-to-date technology’ in evaluation of the objective. Fourth, ‘substantiality in user service with the supplement of library contents’ was excellent in evaluation of core projects but there is some problem with ‘activation of library function through training and supplement of professional manpower.’ Fifth, ‘Enhancement in library information service’ was presented to be excellent in evaluation of main business but there was problem in ‘reinforcement in function of library for each location and type,’ ‘partnership of public-private enterprises’ and ‘promotion for book culture of the public’ thus it need to be revised and supplemented hereafter.

keywords
도서관정보정책, 정책평가, 발전계획, 발전계획평가, SMART, 문화관광부, 도서관발전종합계획, Information Policy, Policy Evaluation, Strategic Plan, Long-term Plan Evaluation, SMART, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Library Development Plan, Information Policy, Policy Evaluation, Strategic Plan, Long-term Plan Evaluation, SMART, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Library Development Plan

Reference

1.

(1999) 충남대학교 도서관 장기발전계획에 관한 연구(2000-2009),

2.

(2003) 도서관의 사명 및 이상 수립에 관한 고찰,

3.

(2005.) 국립중앙도서관 2010., 서울: 동 기관

4.

(2004) 한국의 도서관 정책을 다시 말한다: 도서관발전 종합계획을 중심으로,

5.

(2006) 매니페스토 평가방법과 과제,

6.

(2006) SMART 평가기법을 통한 도서관 장기발전계획 평가에 관한 연구: B대학교 학술정보관의 사례를 중심으로,

7.

(2006) 공공도서관의 전략경쟁분석에 관한 연구: C도서관의 사례를 중심으로,

8.

(2003) 도서관발전 종합계획 1차년도 추진계획(안), 서울: 동 기관.

9.

(2002) 도서관발전 종합계획 2003- 2011, 서울: 동 기관

10.

(2002) 도서관발전 종합계획 세부계획 수립지침, 서울: 동 기관

11.

(2002) 미래형 지식정보서비스 기반 구축을 위한 도서관 발전 종합계획(2003-2011). , 서울: 동 기관

12.

(1999) 대학도서관 경영전략에 관한 연구,

13.

(2003) 대학도서관의 전략적 계획 수립에 관한 연구,

14.

(2007) 학교도서관 정책 평가모형 개발과 적용에 관한 연구,

15.

(2005) 도서관 정책 추진을 위한 행정체계 조직화 방안에 관한 연구,

16.

(2005) 사명, 비전을 통해 본 대학도서관의 핵심 가치,

17.

(2004.) 도서관정보정책, 서울: 한국도서관협회

18.

(2006) 디지털 환경에서의 전문도서관 경영전략수립에 관한 연구: 과학기술분야 전문도서관을 중심으로,

19.

(2002.) Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age, Neal-Schuman

20.

(2003.) Requirements for the Fu- ture of Digital Libraries,

21.

The Seven Ele- ments of Strategic Fit. Journal of Business Strategy,

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science