바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Establishing Facet for Classifying Theological Terms

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2008, v.42 no.3, pp.259-279

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to classify theological terms using facets and form foundation to build a theological thesaurus. The terms was chosen in a English theological dictionary and the number of them are 1,031, but eventually, 984 terms were classified. The facets which classify the terms are 7 fundamentals and 14 sub-facets. Analysing the result of classification, abstract terms are much more than physical terms. They are 70% of the whole. Decimal classification to classify documents comes to dead end, therefore I think the research to classify terms of a specific subject as theology must be active. Furthermore, It is necessary to have knowledge about a specific subject to organize information in a specific subject.

keywords
Theological Terms, Reformed Theology, Facet Classification, Thesaurus, Term Classification, Theological Terms, Reformed Theology, Facet Classification, Thesaurus, Term Classification, 신학 용어, 개혁 신학, 패싯 분류, 시소러스, 용어 분류

Reference

1.

김태수, (2000) 분류의 이해, 문헌정보처리연구회

2.

데스몬드 알렉산더, (2004) IVP 성경신학사전, 한국기독학생회출판부

3.

박지영, (2004) 다차원 시소러스 구축에 관한 실험적 연구, 지식처리연구

4.

손대형, (1998) 패싯분류체계를 이용한 시소러스 작성에 관한 연구,

5.

유영준, (2006) 고전 용어 시소러스의 분류체계에 관한 연구, 한국문헌정보학회지

6.

유해무, (2007) 신학: 삼위일체 하나님을 향한 송영. 개혁 신앙 강좌 7, 성약출판사

7.

Aitchison, Jean, (2000) Thesaurus con- struction and use: a practical manual, 4th ed, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers

8.

Broughton, Vanda,

9.

The getty. [cited 2007.7.11]. Art & Ar- chitecture Thesaurus. Retrieved from,

10.

Grunenberg, L, Facet Analysis: Using Faceted Classification Techniques to Organize Site Content and Structure. Proceed- ings of the ASIS&T 2002 Information Architecture Summint, Baltimore, MD., March 15-17,

11.

Hjørland, Birger, (2002) Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative, Journal of Documentation

12.

ISO, (1986) Documentation: Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monoligual Thesaurai. 2nd ed. ISO 2788 International Organization for Standardization,

13.

McCray,A.T, (1993) UMLS knowledge for biomedical language processing, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association

14.

McKim,Donald K, (1996) Westminster Di- ctionary of Theological Terms, Westminster John Knox Press

15.

Muller,Richard A, (1985) Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms, Baker Academic.

16.

Ranganathan,S.R, (1967) Prolegomena to library classification, Asia Publishing House

17.

Redmond-Neal, Alice, (2005) Thesaurus of Information Sci- ence, Technology, and Librarianship. 3rd ed. ASIS&T Monograph Series. Med- ford, Information Today

18.

Shearer,James R, (2004) A practical exercise in building a thesaurus, in The thesaurus: review, Renaissance, and revision, The Haworth Information Press

19.

Spiteri,Louise, (1998) A simplified model for facet analysis, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science

20.

Spiteri,Louise, (1999) The essential elements of faceted thesauri, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly

21.

Spiritrestoratioin.org. “Theological Terms Dic- tionary.”,

22.

Wolters, Albert M., (2005) Creation regained: biblical basics for a reformational worldview. 2nd ed, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science