In this study, the present condition of 8 Open APIs for books, such as Naver, Daum, Aladdin, Amazon, Google, KERIS, LibraryThing, and OCLC, were compared and analyzed. In addition, the bibliographic records of 167 samples of visible ‘light & paraphotic’ (DDC 535) classifications were selected from the bibliographic records of the library of C university, and the effectiveness of the Open APIs were compared and analyzed. On the basis of the results of this analysis, 12 Open API application models, which were judged to be useful in expanding the function of the access point of the bibliographic records and enhancing the library catalog using Open API, were experimentally implemented. Various methods of augmenting access points of biblio- graphic records and expanded library catalogue were investigated using the unique identifier described in the KORMARC fields of 001, 010, 012, 020, 035, 246, 505, 520, 850, 856 for the integrated format for bibliographic data, and Open API. Finally, using Open API for the brief display and detailed display screen as a result of search of the OPAC of the sample bibliographic records, the devices for the expanding library catalog were implemented as examples.
국립중앙도서관 편저. 2006. 한국문헌자동화목록형식: 통합서지용 . 서울: 한국도서관협회.
네이버. 2009. “Open API - 책검색.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19].<http://dev.naver.com/openapi/apis/data/book>.
다음. 2009. “도서 검색 API.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19].<http://dna.daum.net/apis/search/book>.
대한출판문화협회. 2006. “도서 본문 검색 및 미리보기 서비스 기준.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19].<http://www.kpa21.or.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=d_data&wr_id=25&page=2>.
알라딘. 2009. “도서(상품) 검색 API.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19].<http://www.aladdin.co.kr/ttb/apiguide.aspx#searchapi>.
한국교육학술정보원. 2008. “RISS Open API.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19].<http://www.riss4u.net/etc/etc/openapi_guide01.jsp>.
Amazon. 2009. “Amazon Web Services Developer Community: Docs: Amazon Associates Web Service(API Version: 2009-02-01).” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19].<http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=2228&categoryID=118>.
Breeding, Marshall. 2007. “Next-Generation Library Catalogs.” Library Technology Reports, 43(4).
Byrum, J. D. & Williamson, D. W. 2006. “Enriching Traditional Cataloging for Improved Access to Information: Library of Congress Tables of Contents Projects.” Information Technology and Libraries, 25(1): 4-11.
Faiks, A., Radermacher, A., & Sheehan, A. 2007. “What ABOUT the book? Google- izing the Catalog with Tables of Contents.” Library Philosophy and Practice, 9(3): 1-12.
Google. 2008. “Google Book Search APIs.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19]. <http://code.google.com/apis/books/>.
Hildreth, C. R. 1991. “Advancing toward the E3 OPAC: the imperative and the path.” In Van Pulis, N (Eds), Think Tank on the Present and Future of the Online Catalog: Proceedings (ALA Midwinter Meeting, Chicago, January 11-12, 1991), Reference and Adult Services Division, American Library Association, 17-38.
LC. 2003. “Monographic Electronic Resources: BIBCO Core Record Standards.” [online]. [cited 2008.3.19]. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/bibco/coreelectro.html>
LibraryThing. 2008. “LibraryThing APIs.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19]. <http://www.librarything.com/services/>.
Maxwell, Robert L. 2004. Maxwell's Handbook for AACR2 : Explaining and Illustrating the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules Through the 2003 Update. Chicago: American Library Association.
Miller, Karen D. & Babinec, Michael S. 2008. “Tables of Contents in the Catalog and Their Impact on Usage.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19]. <http://presentations.ala.org/images/e/e7/Ala_june2008.ppt>.
OCLC. 2007. “WorldCat Web service: xISBN.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19]. <http://xisbn.worldcat.org/xisbnadmin/index.htm>.
Pattern, Dave. 2008. “University of Huddersfield -- Circulation and Recommendation Data.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19]. <http://library.hud.ac.uk/data/usagedata/_readme.html>.
Tennant, Roy. 2007, “Trouble in Online Paradise: An Analysis of MARC 856 Usage at One Institution.” [online]. [cited 2009.3.19]. <http://roytennant.com/proto/856/analysis.html>.