바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

An Analysis of Income Models for Open Access in Korean Scholarly Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.3, pp.137-154
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.137

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the tendency of open access income models in gratis open access journals and fee-based online journals in Korea. This study found that there was no clear difference between two groups and fee-based online journals had several of the same characteristics of open access journals. That is, the societies published fee-based journals have requested APC to authors and additional page charges for the articles with research funding. Also, in case of fee-based online journals, the journals received subsidies from external funding agencies were more than free OA journals. These findings show that fee-based online journals in Korea have a lot of capability to transition to open access journals.

keywords
Open Access, Open Access Publishing, Open Access Model, Open Access Income Sources, Korean Journals, Gratis Open Access, 오픈액세스, 오픈액세스 출판, 오픈액세스 모델, 오픈액세스 수입원, 한국학술지, 무료 오픈액세스, Open Access, Open Access Publishing, Open Access Model, Open Access Income Sources, Korean Journals, Gratis Open Access

Reference

1.

강은영, 장덕현. 2010. 오픈액세스 저널 평가범주 개발동향에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 44(1): 243-265.

2.

고영만 외. 2009. 오픈액세스 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인의 학술지 발행기관별 차이 및 학문분야별 차이에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 43(4): 431-449.

3.

윤희윤, 강신영. 2007. 국내외 문헌정보학 학술지의 오픈 액세스 동향 분석. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 38(1): 257-276.

4.

BOAI. 2002. “Budapest Open Access Initiative." [online]. [cited 2010. 7. 2]. <http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml>.

5.

Cockerill, Matthew. 2006. “Business Models in Open Access Publishing.” Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

6.

Crow, Raym. 2006. Publishing Cooperatives: An Alternative for Society Publishers. A SPARC Discussion Paper. [online]. Washington, D.C.: SPARC. [cited 2010. 4. 5]. <http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm~doc/Cooperatives_v1.pdf>.

7.

Crow, Raym. 2009. Income Models for Open Access: An Overview of Current Practice. [online]. Washington, D.C.: SPARC. [cited 2010. 3. 15]. <http://www.arl.org/sparc>.

8.

Harnad, Stevan. 2008. “Waking OA's ‘Slumbering Giant’: The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access." New Review of Information Networking, 14(1): 51-68.

9.

Kaufman-Wills Group. 2005. “The Facts about Open Access: A Study of the Financial and Non-financial Effects of Alternative Business Models for Scholarly Journals.” Worthing: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. [online]. [cited 2010. 3. 20]. <http://www.alpsp.org/ngen_public/article.asp?id=200&did=47&aid=270&st=&oaid=-1>.

10.

Solomon, David. 2008. Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Chandos Publishing Limited.

11.

Suber, Peter. 2008. “Gratis and Libre Open Access." SOAN. [online], 124. [cited 2009. 7. 14]. <http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/08-02-08.htm>.

12.

Suber, Peter. 2009. “Ten Challenges for Open Access Journals." SOAN. [online], 130. [cited 2009. 10. 19]. <http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/01-02-09.htm>.

13.

The SCOAP3 Working Party. 2007. Towards Open Access Publishing in High Energy Physics: Report of the SCOAP3 Working Party[online]. Geneva: CERN. [cited 2010. 5. 20]. <http://cern.ch/oa/SCOAPReport.pdf>.

14.

Ware, Mark., & Mabe, Michael. 2009. An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. Oxford: STM.

15.

Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. MA: The MIT Press.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science