본 연구는 오픈액세스 출판을 위한 수입원들이 국내의 무료 오픈액세스 학술지와 유료 원문 학술지에서 어떻게 도입되고 있는지를 분석하고자 하였다. 그 결과 무료 오픈액세스 학술지와 유료 원문 학술지 간에 분명한 차이는 없었으며, 오히려 유료 원문서비스 학술지에서 오픈액세스 학술지 모델의 특성이 많이 나타나고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 즉, 논문처리비용을 저자측에 요구하고 있었으며, 연구비 수혜논문에 대한 추가 게재료를 부과하고, 외부기관으로부터 지원금을 받는 경우도 무료 오픈액세스 학술지보다 더 많았다. 이것은 국내의 유료 원문 학술지가 무료 오픈액세스로 전환될 가능성이 상당히 높다는 것을 의미한다.
The purpose of this study is to examine the tendency of open access income models in gratis open access journals and fee-based online journals in Korea. This study found that there was no clear difference between two groups and fee-based online journals had several of the same characteristics of open access journals. That is, the societies published fee-based journals have requested APC to authors and additional page charges for the articles with research funding. Also, in case of fee-based online journals, the journals received subsidies from external funding agencies were more than free OA journals. These findings show that fee-based online journals in Korea have a lot of capability to transition to open access journals.
강은영, 장덕현. 2010. 오픈액세스 저널 평가범주 개발동향에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 44(1): 243-265.
고영만 외. 2009. 오픈액세스 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인의 학술지 발행기관별 차이 및 학문분야별 차이에 관한 연구. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 43(4): 431-449.
윤희윤, 강신영. 2007. 국내외 문헌정보학 학술지의 오픈 액세스 동향 분석. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 38(1): 257-276.
BOAI. 2002. “Budapest Open Access Initiative." [online]. [cited 2010. 7. 2]. <http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml>.
Cockerill, Matthew. 2006. “Business Models in Open Access Publishing.” Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Crow, Raym. 2006. Publishing Cooperatives: An Alternative for Society Publishers. A SPARC Discussion Paper. [online]. Washington, D.C.: SPARC. [cited 2010. 4. 5]. <http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm~doc/Cooperatives_v1.pdf>.
Crow, Raym. 2009. Income Models for Open Access: An Overview of Current Practice. [online]. Washington, D.C.: SPARC. [cited 2010. 3. 15]. <http://www.arl.org/sparc>.
Harnad, Stevan. 2008. “Waking OA's ‘Slumbering Giant’: The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access." New Review of Information Networking, 14(1): 51-68.
Kaufman-Wills Group. 2005. “The Facts about Open Access: A Study of the Financial and Non-financial Effects of Alternative Business Models for Scholarly Journals.” Worthing: Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. [online]. [cited 2010. 3. 20]. <http://www.alpsp.org/ngen_public/article.asp?id=200&did=47&aid=270&st=&oaid=-1>.
Solomon, David. 2008. Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Chandos Publishing Limited.
Suber, Peter. 2008. “Gratis and Libre Open Access." SOAN. [online], 124. [cited 2009. 7. 14]. <http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/08-02-08.htm>.
Suber, Peter. 2009. “Ten Challenges for Open Access Journals." SOAN. [online], 130. [cited 2009. 10. 19]. <http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/01-02-09.htm>.
The SCOAP3 Working Party. 2007. Towards Open Access Publishing in High Energy Physics: Report of the SCOAP3 Working Party[online]. Geneva: CERN. [cited 2010. 5. 20]. <http://cern.ch/oa/SCOAPReport.pdf>.
Ware, Mark., & Mabe, Michael. 2009. An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. Oxford: STM.
Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. MA: The MIT Press.