바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.44 No.4

Citation Share

Rethinking Theoretical and Practical Issues of Economic Valuation of Library Services

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.4, pp.231-247
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.231

(2010). Rethinking Theoretical and Practical Issues of Economic Valuation of Library Services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(4), 231-247, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.231

Abstract

This research examines a number of theoretical and practical issues when measuring the economic value of library services. In particular, using two recent studies conducted in Korea as illustrations, the study shows how various measurement decisions affect the final outcomes in the economic valuation of library services and thus points to the need for a more reliable study design. Specific areas of measurement discussed include the following: scope of measurement, application of CVM(Contingent Valuation Method), time vs. monetary value measurement, dealing with outliers, allowing alternatives, and the use of estimation. ROI(Return on Investment) scores or benefit cost ratios vary significantly according to different measurement choices even in the same study. There is a need for collecting qualitative data that complements the quantitative data typically collected in economic valuation studies. The outcome of economic valuation of library services should be considered as one of many representations of library values. Practitioners and researchers should exercise caution in interpreting those results but be able to leverage them to better communicate the value of library services.

keywords
Value, Economics, Outcome, Benefits, Return on Investment(ROI), Benefit Cost Ratio(BC Ratio), Contingent Valuation Method, Stakeholders, Value, Economics, Outcome, Benefits, Return on Investment(ROI), Benefit Cost Ratio(BC Ratio), Contingent Valuation Method, Stakeholders, 가치, 경제성 평가, 결과, 혜택, 투자회수율, 비용편익비율, 조건부가치측정법, 이해관계자

Reference

1.

문화체육관광부. 2009. 공공도서관의 경제적 가치 측정 연구 . [서울]: 문화체육관광부 도서관정보정책기획단. 발간등록번호11-1371000-000160-01.

2.

유승훈. 2003. 표본선택모형을 이용한 이중경계 양분선택형 조건부 가치측정모형의 분석. 재정연구 , 10(1). [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://210.218.195.35/pub/docu/kr/AL/03/AL032003WAA/AL03-2003-WAA-002.PDF>.

3.

정혜경, 고영만, 심원식, 표순희. 2009. 도서관의 경제적 가치측정 연구의 탐색적 메타분석. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 43(4): 117-137.

4.

한국과학기술정보연구원. 2010. KESLI 컨소시엄 사업의 경제적 가치 분석 . [대전]: 동연구원.

5.

Aabø, Svanhild. 2009. “Libraries and Return on Investment(ROI): A Meta-Analysis." New Library World, 110(7/8): 311-324.

6.

Dutta, V., Chander, S., & Srivastava, L. 2005. “Public support for water supply improvements: Empirical evidence from unplanned settlements of Delhi, India." The Journal of Environment & Development, 14(4): 439-462.

7.

Griffiths, J.M., King, D., & Aemi, S. 2006. Taxpayer Return on Investment in Florida Public Libraries. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/bld/roi/pdfs/ROISummaryReport.pdf>.

8.

Johnson, B.K., Groothuis, P.A., & Whitehead, J.C. 2001. “The value of public goods generated by a major league sports team." Journal of Sports Economics, 2: 6-21.

9.

Kling, R. W., Revier, C. F., & Sable, K. 2004. “Estimating the public good value of preserving a local historiclandmark: The role of non-substitutability and citizen information." Unban Studies, 41(10): 2025-2041.

10.

Kwak, S., Yoo, S. and Han, S. 2003. “Estimating the public's value for urban forest in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea: a contingent valuation study." Urban Studies, 40(11): 2207-2221.

11.

Library Council of New South Wales. 2008. Enriching Communities: the Value of Public Libraries in New South Wales. Sydney, Australia: State Library of New South Wales. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://www.sl.nsw.gov.au/services/public_libraries/publications/docs/enriching_communities.pdf>.

12.

McDermott Miller Ltd. 2002. National Bibliographic Database and National Union Catalogue: Economic Valuation. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://www.natlib.govt.nz/catalogues/library-documents/economic-valuation-nbd-nuc>.

13.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/cvblue.pdf>.

14.

NorthStar Economic, Inc. 2008. The Economic Contribution of Wisconsin Public Libraries to the Economy of Wisconsin. Madison, WI. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/pld/pdf/wilibraryimpact.pdf>.

15.

Pung, C.,Clarke, A., & Pattern, L. 2004. “Measuring the Economic Impact of the British Library.” New Review of Academic Librarianship, 10(1): 79-102.

16.

Steffen, Nicolle, Lietzau, Zeth, Lance, Keith Curry, Rybin, Amanda, & Molliconi, Carla. 2009. Public Libraries-a Wise Investment: A Return on Investment Study of Colorado Libraries. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://www.lrs.org/documents/closer_look/roi.pdf>.

17.

Utah State Library Division. 2007. Return on Investment of Public Library Services to Utah's Economy. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 12]. <http://library.utah.gov/documents/library_value/utah_roi.pdf>.

18.

Walton, H., Longo, A., and Dawson, P. 2008. “A Contingent valuation of the 2012 London Olympic Games: A regional perspective." Journal of Sports Economics, 9(3): 304-317.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy