바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

디지털도서관 불안척도 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on the Development of Digital Library Anxiety Scale

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.4, pp.353-371
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.353
박주범
정동열 (이화여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

도서관 불안은 문헌정보학에서 이용자의 정서적 부분에 관한 대표적 연구로 인정 받아왔으며, 많은 도서관 이용자들이 정보이용 과정에서 도서관 불안을 경험하고 있으며 도서관 불안이 정보 활용에 제한요소로 작용하고 있음이 밝혀져 왔다. 오늘날 정보기술의 발전으로 가장 용이하게 접근할 수 있는 디지털도서관 환경은 전통적 도서관의 그것과 매우 달라졌음에도 불구하고 디지털도서관 불안에 관한 연구는 이루어지고 있지 않았다. 이에 본 연구에서는 통계적으로 신뢰성과 타당성을 인정받는 디지털도서관 불안척도(DLAS)를 개발함으로써 디지털도서관 불안의 개념과 하위영역 등을 파악하고 그 특성을 살펴보았다. DLAS는 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 정서적 문제, 자원, 이용지식, 보안, 언어, 기술적 문제, 과제 등 7개의 하위영역과 39문항으로 개발되었으며, 이 7개의 영역은 전체 디지털도서관 불안의 51.165%를 설명하고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한, 인구통계학적 변수와 이용 특성 변수를 사용하여 T검증과 분산분석을 실시함으로써 디지털도서관 불안의 특성을 살펴보고, 일반적 변인과 영향요인을 예측하였다.

keywords
디지털도서관 불안, 디지털도서관 불안척도, 도서관 불안, 도서관 불안척도, Digital Library Anxiety, Digital Library Anxiety Scale, Library Anxiety, Library Anxiety Scale, Digital Library Anxiety, Digital Library Anxiety Scale, Library Anxiety, Library Anxiety Scale

Abstract

Library anxiety has been recognized as one of the representative fields that concerns user's affectivity in library and information study. Considerable library users have been discovered to experience library anxiety according to researches. Although digital libraries are becoming more popular changing drastically from traditional libraries, few studies have addressed the measurement of digital library anxiety(DLA). The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a multidimensional digital library anxiety scale(DLAS) based on previous research in library anxiety and digital libraries. It will become possible to define the construct of DLAS, provide its underlying dimensionalities, and find out how much they explain the construct. Through the exploratory factor analysis, DLAS has been developed with 39 items representing seven distinct factors which were interpreted as affect, resources, know-how, security, language, technology, and task explaining 51.165% of DLA. Also, DLAS' characteristics about demographic variables and use pattern were found through the T-test and ANOVA analysis for each factor.

keywords
디지털도서관 불안, 디지털도서관 불안척도, 도서관 불안, 도서관 불안척도, Digital Library Anxiety, Digital Library Anxiety Scale, Library Anxiety, Library Anxiety Scale, Digital Library Anxiety, Digital Library Anxiety Scale, Library Anxiety, Library Anxiety Scale

참고문헌

1.

박현영, 남태우. 2006. 도서관 불안척도의 개발에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 40(3): 99- 120.

2.

성기주, 이수연. 2003. 디지털도서관의 정보보안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 37(3): 217- 237.

3.

Bostick, S. 1992. The Development of Validation of the Library Anxiety Scale. Ph.D. diss., Wayne State University.

4.

Coffin, R. J., & MacIntyre, P. D. 1999. “Motivational Influence on computer-related affected states." Computers in Human Behavior, 15: 546-569.

5.

Hackbath, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. 2003. “Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of system experience effect in perceived ease of use." Information & Management, 40(3): 221-232.

6.

Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. 1992. “An examination of the factor structures and concurrent validates for the computer attitude scale, the computer anxiety rating scale, and the computer self-efficacy scale." Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52: 735-744.

7.

Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2004. “The impact of information technology on library anxiety: the role of computer attitude." Information Technology and Libraries, 23(4): 138-144.

8.

Jiao, Q. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Lichtenstein, A. 1996. “Library Anxiety: characteristics of ‘at-risk' college students." Library and Information Science Research, 18: 151-163.

9.

Liu, Z. 2005. “Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behavior over the past ten years." Journal of Documentation, 61(6): 700-712.

10.

Luke, C. 2000. “Cyber-schooling and technological change: multiliteracies for new times." in: Cope, B. & Kalanizis, M. (Eds.) Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.

11.

Mellon, C. 1986. “Library Anxiety: A Grounded Theory and its development." College & Research Libraries, 47(2): 160-165.

12.

Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., & Roundtree, R. 2003. “The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies." Journal of Business Research, 56: 899-906.

13.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 1997. “The role of technology in the library anxiety of Arkansas college students.” Arkansas Association of Instructional Media Quarterly, 30(3): 6-8.

14.

Philip, P., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. 2003. “Personality, cognition, and university students examination performance." European Journal of Personality, 17: 435-448.

15.

Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. 2006. “The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations." Research in Nursing& Health, 29: 489-497.

16.

Sever, I. 1994. “Electronic information retrieval as culture shock: an anthropological exploration." RQ, 33: 336-341.

17.

Shoham, S. & Mizrachi, D. 2001. “Library anxiety among undergraduates: A study of Israeli B. Ed Students." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(4): 305-311.

18.

Sturges, P., Teng, V., & Iliffl, U. 2001. “User Privacy in digital library environment: a matter of concern for information professionals." Library Management, 22(8/9): 364-370.

19.

van Kampen, D. J. 2004. “Development of validation of the multidimensional library anxiety scale." College & Research Libraries, Jan: 28-34.

한국문헌정보학회지