바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

메타데이터의 의미론적 확장에 관한 연구

Study on the Semantic Extension of the Concept of Metadata

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.4, pp.373-393
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.373
남태우 (중앙대학교)
이승민 (숙명여자대학교)

초록

현재의 정보환경에서, 메타데이터는 정보자원을 기술하고 관리하는데 있어서 강력한 도구로 인식되고 있다. 하지만, 그 적용의 광범위함으로 인해서 그리고 메타데이터가 지닌 복합적인 의미로 인해서 메타데이터가 무엇인지에 대한 명확한 설명이 어렵게 되었다. 이는 메타데이터를 단순한 서지기술이나 서지적 구조와 구분짓는 것을 어렵게 하고 있으며, 이로 인해 메타데이터가 무엇인지에 대한 혼란이 가중되고 있다. 이러한 개념적인 혼란을 없애고 메타데이터가 지닌 의미를 확인하기 위해서, 본 연구에서는 기존의 메타데이터에 대한 정의에 기반하여 도서관계에 적용할 수 있는 메타데이터의 본질적인 개념을 재정립하였다.

keywords
메타데이터, 메타데이터 역사, 도서관 목록, Metadata, History of Metadata, Library Cataloging

Abstract

In the current information environment around the library community, metadata is recognized as a sophisticated and powerful tool that can manage and represent information resources. However, with the discreet use of the concepts of metadata and metadata standard, there is no clear boundary that differentiates metadata standard from simple resource description and traditional bibliographic structure, leading to confusion as to what a metadata and metadata standard is. To consider these issues, this research discussed what metadata and metadata standards are based previous definitions of metadata. Based on those definitions, the fundamental concept of metadata is reestablished to be properly used in the library community.

keywords
메타데이터, 메타데이터 역사, 도서관 목록, Metadata, History of Metadata, Library Cataloging

참고문헌

1.

Altheim, M., & Palmer, S. B. 2002. Augmented Metadata in XHTML. Sun Microsystems, Inc. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 9]. <http://www.altheim.com/specs/meta/NOTE-xhtml-augmeta.html>.

2.

Baker, T. 2003. DCMI Usage Board review of application profiles. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 10]. <http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/profiles/index.shtml>.

3.

Berners-Lee, T. 1997. Metadata architecture. [online]. [cited 2009. 12. 3]. <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Metadata.html>.

4.

Borbinha, J. 2004. “Authority control in the world of metadata." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(3/4): 105-116.

5.

Burnett, K., Ng, K. B., & Park, S. 1999. “A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13): 1209-1217.

6.

Caplan, P. 1995. “You call it corn, we call it syntax-independent metadata for document-like objects." The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 6(4): 19-23.

7.

Caplan, P. 2003. Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

8.

Coyle, K. 2005. “Understanding metadata and its purpose." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(2): 160-163.

9.

Date, C. J. 1977. An introduction to database systems. 2nd edition. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

10.

Day, M. 1999. Metadata and electronic information. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 11]. <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/presentations/circe/birmingham.html>.

11.

Day, M. 2001. “Metadata in a nutshell." Information Europe, 6(2).

12.

Dillon, M. 2000. “Metadata for web resources: How metadata works on the Web." In Proceedings of Library of Congress Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium: Confronting the Challenges of Networked Resources and the Web, November 2000. Washington, D.C.

13.

Durrell, W. R. 1985. Data Administration: A Practical Guide to Data Administration, McGraw-Hill.

14.

El-Sherbini, M. 2001. “Metadata and the future of cataloging." Library Review, 50(1): 16-27.

15.

El-Sherbini, M., & Klim, G. 2004. “Metadata and cataloging practices." The Electronic Library, 22(3): 238-248.

16.

Fillia, M., et al. 2002. “MetaDL: A digital library of metadata for sensitive or complex research data." In Proceedings of ECDL 2002, 16-18 September 2002. Rome, Italy: Pontifical Gregorian University.

17.

Gill, T. 2000. Metadata and the World Wide Web. In Introduction to Metadata: Pathways to digital information. Online edition, version 2.1. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 11]. <http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/metadata.html>.

18.

Gill, T., Gilliland, A. J., & Woodley, M. S. 2000. Introduction to metadata: Pathway to digital information. Online edition, version 2.1. [online]. [cited 2010. 10. 9]. <http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/metadata.html>.

19.

Greenberg, J. 2003. “Metadata and the World Wide Web." Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 72: 1876-1888. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

20.

Greenberg, J. 2005. “Understanding metadata and metadata schemes." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 40(3/4): 17-36.

21.

Hakala, J. 1997. “Dublin Core in 1997: A report from Dublin Core metadata workshop 4 & 5." Nordinfo-Nytt, 20(3/4): 10-22.

22.

Hanks, D. 2007. All about metadata: An instruction for digital photographsers. [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 30]. <http://www.davidhanks.com/AllAboutMetadata.pdf>.

23.

Heery, R. 1996. “Review of metadata formats." Program, 30(4): 345-373.

24.

Hillmann, D. 2005. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative: Using Dublin Core. [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 13]. <http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/>.

25.

Hodge, G. 2005. “Metadata for electronic information resources: From variety to interoperability." Information Services & Use, 25(1): 35-45.

26.

Hunter, J. 2001. “MetaNet: A metadata term thesaurus to enable semantic interoperability between metadata domains." Journal of Digital Information, 1(8).

27.

Krockel, H., & Westbrook, J. H. 1987. “Computerized materials-information systems." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 322(1567): 373-391.

28.

Marchionini, G. 2007. “Toward multimedia surrogates." Los Angeles Chapter of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Talk. 12 January 2007.

29.

McCarthy, J. L. 1982. “Metadata management for large statistical databases." In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 8-10 September 1982. Mexico City, Mexico. 234-243.

30.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. 2007. Online edition. [online]. [cited 2010. 8. 30]. <http://www.mw.com/dictionary/interoperability>.

31.

Milstead, J., & Feldman, S. 1999. “Metadata: Cataloging by any other name." Online, January 1999: 24-31.

32.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 1990. Directory Interchange Format Manual, Version 3.0. Greenbelt, Maryland: NASA/GSFC National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC).

33.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 1991. Directory Interchange Format Manual, Version 4.0. Greenbelt, Maryland: NASA/GSFC National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC).

34.

O'Sullivan, M. 2007. The word “META:meaning and pronunciation." In HTML code tutorial. [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 6]. <http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/document/index_tagsupp_14.html>.

35.

Oxford English Dictionary. 2007. Online Edition. [online]. [cited 2010. 8. 30]. <http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00307096?query_type=word&queryword=meta&first=1&max_to_show=10&sort_type=alpha&result_place=4&search_id=rpyw-Lc3mds-3152&hilite=00307096>.

36.

Public Library Association. 2007. Metadata: Always more than you think. [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 3]. <http://www.pla.org/ala/pla/plapubs/technotes/metadata.cfm>.

37.

Qin, J. 2000. “Representation and organization of information in the Web Space: From MARC to XML." Informing Science, 3(2): 83-88.

38.

Qin, J. 2006. “Metadata as the underpinning of sustainable and effective access to scientific data." In Proceedings of 20th International CODATA Conference: Scientific data and knowledge within the information society, 22-25 October 2006. Beijing, China.

39.

Sen, A. & Jacob, V. S. 1998. “Industrial-strength data warehousing." Communications of the ACM, 41(9): 28-31.

40.

Shelley, P. E. 1986. “Resolution Committee report." In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geoscience Information, 1-6 June 1986. Adelaide, South Australia. vol. 2: 116-117.

41.

Sun Microsystem. 2002. Digital Library Technology Trends. Santa Clara, CA: Sun Microsystem, Inc.

42.

Sundgren, B. 1973. An infological approach to data bases. Doctoral dissertation. School of Economics, University of Stockholm, Sweden.

43.

Sundgren, B. 1975. Theory of data bases. 1st edition. New York: Petrocelli/Charter.

44.

Taylor, A. G. 1999. The organization of information. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited Inc.

45.

Taylor, C. 2007. “Metadata's many meanings and uses: Briefing paper." Catalogue & Index, February 2007.

46.

Terje, B. 1998. “A semantic modeling approach to metadata." Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 8(5): 377-386.

47.

Tozer, G. 1999. Metadata management for information control and business success. Norwood, MA: Artech House.

48.

Weibel, S. 1997. “Discovering online resources. The Dublin Core: A simple content description model for electronic resources." Arts and Humanities Data Services. [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://ahds.ac.uk/public/metadata/disc_01.html>.

49.

Wendler, R. 1999. “Branching out: Cataloging skills and functions in the digital age." Journal of Internet Cataloging, 2(1): 43-54.

50.

Yu, S., Lu, K., & Chen, R. 2003. “Metadata management system: Design and implementation." The Electronic Library, 21(2): 154-164.

한국문헌정보학회지