-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
Implications of Five Laws of Library Science on Dr. S R Ranganathan’s Colon Classification: An Explorative Study
Implications of Five Laws of Library Science on Dr. S R Ranganathan’s Colon Classification: An Explorative Study
B. Ramesh Babu (University of Madras)
P. Nageswara Rao (M.G. R. Knowledge City, CIT Campus)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
There have been several milestones in the history of library classification but most of the schemes failed to meet the new challenges in the organisation of information. Dr S R Ranganathan tried to revolutionise the whole thinking on classificatory approach, when he devised the Colon Classification (CC) in 1933. He developed the Colon Classification scheme with a sound theoretical background based on normative principles, Five laws of Library science, canons, etc. One important feature of CC is that, its use is not confined to information storage and retrieval alone. This paper presents an over view of different editions of the CC highlighting the salient features of the editions. Further the implication of Five Laws of Library Science has been described. The authors stressed that the features of such as greater hospitality, specificity and mixed notation has paved the way to design and develop the depth schedules on various micro level subjects and so far about 130 micro schedules have been published. The impressions by the leading LIS professionals during and after Ranganathan’s time have been highlighted. The authors expressed the fear that when the library world would see the complete version of the seventh edition of CC? It may be due to lack of institutional support engaging in the research or financial constraints. The authors are of the opinion that any scheme to flourish needs a sound research body to bring out the revised editions as done in the case of Dewey Decimal Classification. The relevance of the CC in the contemporary world of Librarianship is discussed. Finally concludes that CC needs to be resuscitated as it is a precious national heritage; and still a force for the management of libraries.
- keywords
- Colon Classification, Five Laws of Library Science, S. R. Ranganathan, Relevance of CC, Depth Schedules, Analytico-Synthetic scheme, Colon Classification, Five Laws of Library Science, S. R. Ranganathan, Relevance of CC, Depth Schedules, Analytico-Synthetic scheme
참고문헌
Bliss, H. E. 1993. Organisation of Knowledge in Libraries and Subject Approach to Body.2nd ed. New York: H. W. Wilson. p.299.
Curwen, Anthony G. 1978. “Revision Classification schemes: Policies and practices.” Journalof Librarianship, 10(1): 23-24.
Dahlberg, I. 1977. “Major developments in classification.” In: Advances in Librarianship, Vol.7.New York : Academic Press.
Foskett, A. C. 1969. Subject Approach to Information. London: Clive Bingley. p.390.
Garfield, E. 1984. Essays of an Information Scientist, 7(6): 5-12.
Grolier, Eric de. 1962. Study of General Categories Applicable to Classification and Codingin Documentation. Paris: UNESCO.
Husain, Shabahat. 1973. Library Classifications: Facets and Analysis. New Delhi: Tata McGrawHill. p.310.
Jain, H.C. 1964. “Colon Classification: A review article.” Library Association Record, 66(8): 348.
Jones, M. F. 1996. “Colon, revise or die.” Library Association Record, 68(5): 186.
Kaula, P. N. 1965. “Colon Classification: Genesis and Development.” In: Library ScienceToday. Ranganathan’s Festschrift. Vol.1. Edited by P. N. Kaula. Bombay: Asia PublishingHouse. pp.87-93.
Kaula, P.N. 1976. “Editor’s Preface to Mr. M F Jones’: Colon revise or die.” Herald ofLibrary Science, 15(3-4): 345-46.
Kumar, Krishan. 1979. “Classification practice in Delhi University College Libraries.” Journalof Library and Information Science, 4(1): 41-76.
Maltby, Arthur Ed. 1976. Classification in the 1970s :A Second Look. Rev. ed. London:Clive Bingley.
Mcllwaine, La C. 1995. “UDC Centenary: The present state and future prospects.” KnowledgeOrganisation, 22(2): 67.
Mills, J. 1951. “The Bliss and Colon Classification.” Library Association Record, 53(5): 153.
Mills, J. 1960. Classification Schemes and Indian Libraries. Delhi: Metropolitan. p.226.
Neelameghan, A. et al. 1973. “Edition 7 schedule of basis subjects.” Library Science witha slant to Documentation, 10: 222-60.
Radhakrishanan, S. 1941. Hindu View of Life. London: Allen & Unwin. p.130.
Raghavan, K.S. 1998. “Classification and indexing: India’s contribution.” In: Fifty yearsLibrary and Information Science in India. Edited by M.K. Jain et al., Delhi: Shipra Publication.pp.225-26.
Raju, A. A. N. 1984. Decimal, Universal Decimal and Colon Classification. Delhi: AjanthaPublications. pp.93-96.
Ramesh Babu, B. & Ramasamy, A. 2002. “Designing depth schedules based on ColonClassification.” In. Libraries and Information Studies in Retrospect and Prospect: Essaysin honour of Prof. D. R.Kalia. Edited by J. L. Sardana. New Delhi: Concept PublishingCompany. pp.83-91.
Ramesh Babu, B. 1996. “Relevance of Ranganathan’s concepts and ideas in the contemporarylibrarianship: An analysis.” In. International and Comparative Librarianship and InformationSystems. Vol.1. Edited by P.N. Kaula. Delhi: B.R. Publications. pp.73-81.
Ranganthan, S. R. 1931. Five Laws of Library Science. Madras: Asia Publishing House, p.348.
Ranganathan, S. R. 1963. Colon Classification. p.47.
Ranganathan, S. R. 1967. A Descriptive Account of Colon Classification. Bombay: AsiaPublishing House. p.23.
Ranganathan, S.R. 1971. “Colon Classification, edition 7(1971): a preview.” Library Sciencewith a slant to Documentation, 6(3). Paper M: 193-242.
Satija, M. P. 1986. “Use of Colon Classification.” International Classification, 13(2): 92-99.
Satija, M. P. 1993a. Editor’s Introduction to Colon Classification 7th Edition: Some Perspectives.New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, p.196.
Satija, M. P. 1993b. “Ranganathan and team research.” Herald Library Science, 32(1-2): 84-94.
Satija, M. P. 2002. “Revision and future of Colon Classification.” In: Libraries and InformationStudies in Retrospect and Prospect: Essays in honour of Prof. D. R.Kalia. Edited by J. L.Sardana. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company. pp.73-84.
Sethi, A. R. 1983. “Legacy of Ranganathan.” In: Developing Horizons in Library and InformationScience. Vol.1. Edited by C.D. Sharma and Kailash Vyas. Jaipur: Printwell Publishers. p.179.
Sharma, R. N. 1986. Indian Academic Libraries and S.R. Ranganathan: A Critical Study.New Delhi: Sterling. p.6.
Singh, Sukhdev, & Prasad, K.N. 1994. “Indian ISKO Chapter: Seminar on Classification andKnowledge Representation.” Knowledge Organisation, 21(1).
Vickery, B. C. 1965. “Ranganathan’s work on classification.” In: Library Science Today.Vol.1. Edited by P.N. Kaula. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, p.109.
Vora, Ranjana. 1986. “Analytical synthetic scheme of classification: Its impact and relevanceto modern theories of library classification.” In: Ranganathan’s Philosophy: Assessment, Impactand Relevance. Edited by T. S. Rajagopalan. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. p.306.
Wellisch, H H. 1980. “Classification.” In: ALA world Encyclopedia of Library and InformationServices. Edited by R. Wedgeworth. Chicago: American Library Association. pp.146-150.
Williamson, Nancy. 1994. “Subject analysis systems.” In: Guide to Technical Services Resources.Edited by Johnson. Chicago: ALA. p.69.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수