바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.46 No.2
Citation Share

A Study on the Correlation between the Index Values and Qualitative․Quantitative Evaluation Elements and the Distinction Ability of the Journals' Registration Condition of the KCI-based Composite Index in Evaluating Korean Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2012, v.46 no.2, pp.245-260
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.245


& (2012). A Study on the Correlation between the Index Values and Qualitative․Quantitative Evaluation Elements and the Distinction Ability of the Journals' Registration Condition of the KCI-based Composite Index in Evaluating Korean Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2), 245-260, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.245
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the change in the correlation between the index values and qualitative․quantitative evaluation elements by applying 'the decile of total number of articles' instead of the average annual number of articles in Kor-Factor2, and to evaluate the distinction ability between registered journals and register nominee journals of the KCI. The correlation between the index values and qualitative․quantitative evaluation elements was analyzed by calculating the correlation coefficient between the index values and the evaluation elements, and then the correlation was compared with that of Kor-Factor2. To evaluate the distinction ability, we carried out independent samples t-test on the mean difference between index values of register nominee journal group and registered journal group and compared the mean difference with that of Kor-Factor2, IF and journal h-index. As a result, we found that the modified index applying the decile of total number of articles was effective in improving the balance among the correlation between the index values and qualitative․quantitative evaluation elements compared to Kor-Factor2, and the new index appeared to be superior to other indexes on distinction ability of the journal's registration condition in the KCI.

keywords
한국 학술지, 한국학술지인용색인, Kor-Factor, 복합지표, 평가요소, 학술지 생산성, 등재 상태, 구별 능력, 십분위수, Korean Journal, KCI, Kor-Factor, Composite Index, Evaluation Element, Journal’s Productivity, Registration Condition, Distinction Ability, Decile

Reference

1.

조은성, 송재도. 2011. 국내외 마케팅 학술지의 영향력: Kor-Factor와 Impact Factor의 문제점을 중심으로. 『마케팅관리연구』, 16(2): 53-82.

2.

한국연구재단. 2010. 『학술지평가 및 KCI 시스템 소개』. 서울: 한국연구재단.

3.

한국연구재단. 2011. 『2008년도 KCI 인용지수분석 보고서』. 서울: 한국연구재단.

4.

한국연구재단. 2012. 한국학술지인용색인. Data 구축 통계. [online]. [cited 2012.4.11]. <http://www.kci.go.kr>.

5.

홍종선, 조수련. 2007a. 『KCI 기반 Kor-Factor (Korea Factor) 모형 개발 기초연구』. 서울: 한국학술진흥재단.

6.

홍종선, 조수련. 2007b. 『KCI 기반 Kor-Factor (Korea Factor) 평가지표 개발 및 시범적용』. 서울: 한국학술진흥재단.

7.

Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. 2006. “Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?” Scientometrics, 68(1): 179-189.

8.

Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. 2006. “A Hirsch-type index for journals.” Scientometrics, 69(1): 169-173.

9.

Buela-Casal, G. 2004. “Assessing the quality of articles and scientific journals: Proposal for Weighted Impact Factor and a quality index.” Psychology In Spain, 8(1): 60-76.

10.

Egghe, L. 2006. “Theory and practise of the g-index.” Scientometrics, 69(1): 131-152.

11.

Garfield, E. 2000. “Use of Journal Citation Reports and Journal Performance Indicators in measuring short and long term journal impact.” Croatian Medical Journal, 41(4): 368-374.

12.

Garfield, E. 2006. “The history and meaning of the Journal Impact Factor.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1): 90-93.

13.

Glänzel, W. & Moed, H. F. 2002. “Journal impact measures in bibliometric research.” Scientometrics, 53(2): 171-193.

14.

Hirsch, J. E. 2005. “An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46): 16569-16572.

15.

Ko, Y. M., Cho, S.-R., & Park, Y. S. 2011. “A study on the optimization of KCI-based index (Kor-Factor) in evaluating Korean journals.” Scientometrics, 88(1): 61-71.

16.

Pinski, G. & Narin, F. 1976. “Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics.” Information Processing & Management, 12(5): 297-312.

17.

Tomer, C. 1986. “A statistical assessment of two measures of citation: The Impact Factor and the Immediacy Index.” Information Processing & Management, 22(3): 251-258.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy