바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

스마트기기와 SNS 활용이 사회자본 형성에 미치는 영향 연구

A Study on the Effect of Smart Device and SNS on Social Capital

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2013, v.47 no.2, pp.161-180
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.161
이승민 (충남대학교)

초록

본 연구에서는 스마트기기 및 SNS의 활용이 사회자본의 형성에 미치는 영향을 설문조사를 통해 실증적으로 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 스마트기기는 다양한 커뮤니케이션 방식을 제공함으로써 교량적 사회자본을 확장할 수 있는 기반을 마련해 주고 있다. SNS는 오프라인에서 형성된 사회적 관계를 온라인으로 확장시킴으로써 결속적 사회자본을 강화하고 있으며, 온라인 커뮤니티 구축을 통한 사회적 관계의 확장을 이끌어내어 교량적 사회자본을 증대시키고 있다. 반면, 스마트기기를 이용한 SNS의 활용은 사회자본의 증대와 관련이 없는 것으로 나타났으나, 사람들의 사회활동의 참여를 활발하게 함으로써 복합적인 사회자본을 형성하는 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
사회자본, 결속적 사회자본, 교량적 사회자본, 스마트기기, 소셜 네트워크 서비스, Social Capital, Bonding Social Capital, Bridging Social Capital, Smart Device, Social Network Service

Abstract

This research analyzed how smart devices and Social Network Service (SNS) change the construction of social capital. The results show that smart devices provide the foundation of expending ‘bridging social capital’ by offering various communication tools. SNS reinforces ‘bonding social capital’ and extends ‘bridging social capital’ by expanding social relationships from off-line to online and supporting the construction of online communities. In contrast, the use of SNS through smart devices is not related to the generation of social capital. However, it builds a multi-aspect social capital by making people participate in various social activities.

keywords
사회자본, 결속적 사회자본, 교량적 사회자본, 스마트기기, 소셜 네트워크 서비스, Social Capital, Bonding Social Capital, Bridging Social Capital, Smart Device, Social Network Service

참고문헌

1.

금희조, 조재호. 2010. 스마트폰, 커뮤니케이션 격차, 그리고 정치참여. ..한국언론학보.., 54(5): 348-371.

2.

서문기, 오주현. 2010. 사회 네트워크 서비스가 사회자본의 형성과 유지에 미친 효과에 관한 연구. ..사회과학논총.., 13: 111-138.

3.

Bourdieu, P. 1983. Forms of capital. In J. C. Richards (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.

4.

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. 2007. “Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). [online]. [cited 2013.4.4]. <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html>.

5.

Castells, M. 2004. The Power of Identity. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

6.

Coleman, J. 1988. “Social capital in the creation of human capital." American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-121.

7.

Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

8.

Cooper, H. et al. 1999. Social Capital and Health. London: Health Education Authority.

9.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. 2011. “Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices." New Media & Society, 13(6): 873-892.

10.

Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The strength of weak ties." American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.

11.

Granovetter, M. S. 1983. “The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited." Sociological Theory, 1: 201-233.

12.

Hamton, K. 2002. “Place-based and IT mediated community." Planning Theory and Practice, 3(2): 228-231.

13.

Ishii, K. 2006. “Implications of mobility: The uses of personal communication media in everyday life." Journal of Communication, 56: 346-365.

14.

Moran, P. 2005. “Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance." Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1129-1151.

15.

Putnam, R. D. 1995. “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital." Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78.

16.

Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

17.

Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. 2004. “How does the Internet affect social capital?" In Huysman, M., & Wulfk, V. (Eds.), Social Capital and Information Technology (113-135).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

18.

Rosen, L. D. 2011. “Poke me: How social networks can both help and harm our kids." Presentation in 119th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington D.C., August 4-7, 2011.

19.

Turkle, S. 2008. “Always-on/Always-on-you: The tethered self." In Katz, J. E. (ed.), Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies. MA: MIT Press.

20.

Vergeer, M., & Pelzer, B. 2009. “Consequences of media and Internet use for offline and online network capital and well-being: A causal model approach." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15: 189-210.

21.

Williams, D. 2006. “On and off the ‘net’: Scales for social capital in an online era." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). [online]. [cited 2013.3.5]. <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/williams.html>.

22.

Woolcock, M. 1998. “Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical Synthesis and policy framework." Theory and Society, 27(2): 151-208.

한국문헌정보학회지