바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.47 No.3
Citation Share

A Study on Consideration in KCR4 through Testing the Description of Content Types and Media Types of ISBD and RDA

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2013, v.47 no.3, pp.119-137
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.119

(2013). A Study on Consideration in KCR4 through Testing the Description of Content Types and Media Types of ISBD and RDA. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 119-137, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.119
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study was to compare the description of content types(content forms) and media types of RDA and ISBD in order to revise GMD of KCR4. Test and survey were conducted as the research methods for comparing content types and media types description of RDA and ISBD. As a result, RDA content types description is better than ISBD in aspects of uniformity and correct rates. Especially, detailed list of content types in RDA could make the resources to be expressed completely, but content forms with adding the content qualification in ISBD could make the resource to be expressed with many errors. Therefore, there were some considerations to describe content types. First, content types terms in RDA need to be specified more. Second, some detailed rules need to be regulated on the combination of content qualification of ISBD. Third, the mapping tables between RDA content types and ISBD content forms need to be revised. Fourth, RDA content types list will be more applicable in KCR4 based on the uniformity and correct rates in the test. This study will contribute to analyze and suggest RDA and ISBD terms list of content types and media types for KCR4.

keywords
Content Types, Content Forms, Media Types, Carrier Types, RDA, ISBD, GMD, KCR4, 내용유형, 내용형식, 매체유형, 용기유형, 한국목록규칙, 국제표준서지기술, 자원의 기술과 접근, Content Types, Content Forms, Media Types, Carrier Types, RDA, ISBD, GMD, KCR4

Reference

1.

이미화. 2011a. KCR4 GMD 및 SMD 기술의 새로운 방안 모색. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 42(2): 237-255.

2.

이미화. 2011b. RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구. ..정보관리학회지.., 28(3): 103-121.

3.

이미화. 2012. ISBD 통합판의 서지기술 특징 및 고려사항에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 46(4): 169-188.

4.

Bertolini, M. V. 2012. “The new ISBD area 0 and the teaching of cataloging of non-book materials.” JLIS.it, 3(1): 4794-1-4794-49. [online]. [cited 2013.1.10]. <dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3947078.pdf>.

5.

Dunsire, G. 2007. “Distinguishing content from carrier: the RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization." D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2). [online]. [cited 2011.3.10]. <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/dunsire/01dunsire.html>.

6.

ISBD Review Group. 2012. Mapping of RDA Content Types to ISBD Content Forms and Media Types. [online]. [cited 2012.10.5]. <http://www.ifla.org/node/5618>.

7.

JSC for Development of RDA. 2010. RDA: Resource Description and Access. Chicago: ALA. [online]. [cited 2012.3.10]. <http://www.rdatoolkit.org/subscribe>.

8.

JSC for Revision of AACR. 2006. RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization. [online]. [cited 2013.3.15]. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5chair10.pdf>.

9.

Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section. 2011. ISBD : International Standard Bibliographic Description(ISBD). Consolidated edition. Berlin: Saur.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy