바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.47 No.3

Citation Share

A Comparative Analysis of Classical Data in KCR 4 and CCR 2

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2013, v.47 no.3, pp.275-293
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.275

(2013). A Comparative Analysis of Classical Data in KCR 4 and CCR 2. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 275-293, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.275

Abstract

This study conducted comparative analysis of cataloging descriptions and rules in KCR 4 and CCR 2, as follows, for the purpose of seeking understanding of classical materials cataloging rules and networking of oriental historical data cataloging (bibliographical descriptions). First, to compare the general rules, the objects of descriptions and composition of descriptions, recording order, and punctuation and information source of descriptions were analyzed. As a result, KCR 4 is more detailed in terms of author role identifications and information source regulations and CCR2 is more detailed in terms of regulations related to printing and publications and serial publications. Second, to compare the details, the main titles and liability indications, edition details, publication details and format details, and note details. As a result, regarding the description of edition type and publication details, KCR4 has detailed regulations and CCR2 has characteristic summary in terms of note details.

keywords
고전자료, 목록, 중국문헌편목규칙 2판, 한국목록규칙 4판, Classical Materials, Cataloging, KCR 4, CCR 2

Reference

1.

한국도서관협회.. 2003. �한국목록규칙�. 4판.. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

2.

姜新年. 2007. “編目規則差异和統一進展.” 公共圖書館 [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. <http://www.publiclib.org.cn/library/periodical_show/990.html>.

3.

國家圖書館 中國文獻編目規則 修訂組 編. 2005. 中國文獻編目規則 . 2版. 北京: 北京圖書館出版社.

4.

段明蓮 2006. “中國文獻編目規則的現狀与發展趨勢” 中國圖書館學報 , 32(3). [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. <http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTS200603020.htm>.

5.

梁儉. 2008. “圖書館編目規則的應用現狀及問題分析.” 圖書館界 , 2: 91-94.

6.

楊小雲. 2006. “ 中國文獻編目規則 和 西文文獻著彔條例 之比較” 現代情報 , 26(11). [online]. [cited 2013.6.30]. <http://www.worlduc.com/blog2012.aspx?bid=4036638>.

7.

鄭衡泌. 2004. “海崍兩岸中文圖書編目規則比較” 文獻信息論壇 , 2(總第70期): 50-53.

8.

“Descriptive Cataloging of East Asian Material: CJK Examples of AACR2 and Library of Congress Rule Interpretations.” 2004. [online]. [cited 2013.6.20]. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/CJKIntro.html>.

9.

GB 3469-83(Document Types and Document Media Codes). [online]. [cited 2013.7.1]. <http://www.chinaagrisci.com/V2/Upment loadFiles/2008327205127151.pdf>.

10.

Gu, Ben et al. “Chinese Cataloging Rules and International Cataloging Principles: A Report of Similarities and Differences.” [online]. [cited 2013.7.2]. <http://www.nl.go.kr/icc/paper/22_1.pdf>.

11.

Pong, Joanna, & Cheung, Celine. 2006. “Cataloging of Chinese Language Materials in the Digital Era: The Cataloging Standards and Practices in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong.” Library and Information Science, 32(1): 53-56.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy