바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.48 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Improvement of the BRM Classification System for Policy Information Service

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2014, v.48 no.4, pp.135-171
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.4.135


& (2014). A Study on the Improvement of the BRM Classification System for Policy Information Service. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(4), 135-171, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.4.135
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The aim of this study was to suggest a classification system adapted to provide policy information services. For this purpose, this study completed the following processes; BRM taxonomy analysis, document analysis, analysis of classification systems providing policy information, consulting classification experts, surveys and interviews with policy information consumers, and an empirical validation process through the actual construction of policy information materials. Finally, this study complemented and modified the BRM taxonomy system and proposed a classification system appropriate to policy information resources. Through the procedures of experts discussion, the steps of BRM analysis appropriate to provide policy information services is determined as three steps. The domestic institute websites for policy information services has confirmed the appropriateness of the BRM taxonomy system through the analysis system and service research to provide policy information resources. Also through the specialist interview, the confirmation of BRM and the improvement has been drawn. Through the questionaires, the study analyzes the appropriateness of available BRM taxonomy system and the requirements by subjects. And through the empirical verificaion, it determines the subject of BRM taxonomy system for policy information services.

keywords
정책정보서비스, BRM 분류체계, 정책정보자료, Policy Information Service, BRM Taxonomy System, Policy Information Resources

Reference

1.

권택기. 2010. 2010년 국감질의자료. [online] [cited 2014. 5. 2.]<http://visionk.or.kr/attachment/cfile9.uf@1249DA4C4F FE5A812B1B98.PDF>

2.

강신택. 1978. 정책학개론. 서울: 법문사.

3.

곽승진, 이응봉, 장덕현, 배경재, 김정택. 2011. 정책정보서비스 활성화를 위한 국립도서관 운영전략연구. 한국도서관정보학회지, 42(3): 311-330.

4.

김동욱. 1995. 정책정보 공동이용을 위한 공공부문 정보화. 국가기간전산망저널, 2(4): 49-61.

5.

김주미. 2008. 우리나라 중소기업 정책정보시스템의 현황과 개선 방향. 한국IT서비스학회지, 7(4): 61-86.

6.

박용부, 김태수. 2011. 건설기록물 분류체계 모형에 관한 연구. 情報管理學會誌, 28(3): 83-101.

7.

설문원. 2013. 기록분류를 위한 정부기능분류체계의 적용 구조 및 운용 분석: 중앙행정기관을 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지, 24(4): 23-51.

8.

신신애. 2005. EA(Enterprise Architecture) 기반 표준화 추진방안. 정보과학회지, 23(12): 63-69.

9.

양순애. 2007. 전자정부사업 분석 및 전략적 추진방향: 중앙과 지방의 정부기능분류체계 관점에서. 한국지역정보화학회지, 10(2): 89-120.

10.

이대영. 1984. 정책학개론. 서울: 고시계사.

11.

이명희. 2013. 정책정보서비스의 활성화 방안 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3): 139-160.

12.

이현정. 2010. 형사사건기록의 분류방안 연구: 사안 파일(Case file) 관리를 중심으로. 한국기록관리학회지, 10(1): 169-197.

13.

정보통신부. 2006. 범정부 기술참조모형 1.0. [서울]: 정보통신부.

14.

최봉기. 1981. 정책정보의 기능과 가치평가. 한국행정학보, 15: 157-172.

15.

최재황. 2009. 국립디지털도서관의 정책정보포털 협력망 구축방안. 사회과학 담론과 정책, 2(1):97-114.

16.

행정안전부. 2008. 정부기능분류시스템(BRM) 운영 지침. [서울]: 행정안전부.

17.

홍현진, 노영희. 2007. 국립중앙도서관 정책정보서비스 운영 및 발전방안 연구. [서울]: 국립중앙도서관.

18.

홍현진, 노영희. 2008. 정책정보통합서비스시스템 구축 모형에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(1): 95-125.

19.

Alberts, Inge et al. 2010. Bringing together Functional Classification and Business Process Analysis: Growing Trends in Records Management. Cogniva Information Research Institute.

20.

Foscarini, Fiorella. 2009. Function-Based Records Classification Systems: An Exploratory Study Of Records Management Practices In Central Banks. Ph.D. diss., University of British Columbia.

21.

Hernon, P. and McClure, C. R. 1988. “GPO Depository Programs: Building ofr the Future."Library Journal, 113: 51-60.

22.

Janowski, T., Pardo, T. A. and Davies, J. 2012. “Government Information Networks- Mapping Electronic Governance cases through Public Administration concepts." Government Information Quarterly, 29: S1-S10.

23.

Joseph, P., Debowski, S. and Goldschmidt, P. 2012. “Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities:implications for ISO 15489’s implementation.” Records Management Journal, 22(1):57-75.

24.

Orr, Stuart A. 2005. Functions-Based Classification of Records: Is it Functional? Master’s thesis, Northumbria University.

25.

Rappaport, A. 1975. Information for Decision-making: Quantitative and Behavioral Dimensions. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.. London: Prentice-Hall.

26.

Schellenberg, Theodore R. 1956. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

27.

Smyth, Zoë A. 2005. “Adopting a Functional Classification of Business Processes in Northern Ireland.” Journal of the Society of Archivists, 26(2): 233-242.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy