바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.50 No.1

Citation Share

‘FRBR family’ 모형의 통합에 관한 연구- FRBR 도서관 참조모형을 중심으로 -

Consolidation of FRBR Family Models Focusing on FRBR Library Reference Model

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.1, pp.533-553
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.533
박지영 (한성대학교)
박지영. (2016). ‘FRBR family’ 모형의 통합에 관한 연구- FRBR 도서관 참조모형을 중심으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(1), 533-553, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.533

초록

1998년부터 2010년에 걸쳐 발표되었던 ‘FRBR family’ 모형은 2016년에 ‘FRBR 도서관 참조모형’(FRBR LRM)이라는 새로운 이름으로 재구조화될 예정이다. FRBR LRM은 기존의 개념 모형인 FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD을 포함하여, 온톨로지 형식의 FRBRCore 및 FaBio, 박물관 분야와의 협력을 위한 FRBRoo와의 연계도 고려한 통합모형이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 FRBR LRM의 개발 배경과 통합모형으로서의 특징을 이용자 과업, 개체, 속성, 관계 측면에서 분석하고, LRM의 개체와 관계를 protégé에 적용하여 검토하였다. 이를 통해 초기 FRBR 모형과 LRM의 차이점을 살펴보았으며, FRBR 모형이 시맨틱웹과 같은 다양한 분야에 응용될 수 있음을 확인하였다. 앞으로 FRBR 모형을 적용할 때는, 단일한 구현방식만을 규정할 것이 아니라, 다양한 FRBR 응용 모형을 함께 검토하고, 그 중에서 국가별이나 기관별로 가장 적합한 모형을 선정한 뒤, 필요한 경우 기존의 모형을 변형하거나 통합할 수 있어야 할 것이다.

keywords
FRBR 개념모형, 서지레코드의 기능요건, 전거데이터의 기능요건, 주제전거 데이터의 기능요건, 객체지향형 FRBR, FRBR 도서관 참조 모형, FRBR Family Models, FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD, FRBRoo, Consolidated FRBR, FRBR Library Reference Model(FRBR LRM)

Abstract

FRBR family models, which is published from 1998 to 2010, will be restructured in 2016 and the new name of the model is “FRBR Library Reference Model(LRM).” FRBR LRM is a consolidated model based on the legacy FRBR family of conceptual models - FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD and the two ontological models - FRBRCore and FaBio, as well as FRBRoo, the cooperated model with museum field. In this study, therefore, FRBR LRM is analyzed in respect to background information, characteristics of the model, such as user tasks, entities, attributes, and relationships. Experimental adaptation to protégé for the LRM’s entities and relationships is also conducted. Through this test, the differences between the original models and the consolidated model was reviewed and the applicability of the FRBR LRM model to the semantic web is also discussed. From now on, we have to select and modify among the various FRBR related models to meet our information needs. It will be difficult to find only one Implementation Methodology for every information needs.

keywords
FRBR 개념모형, 서지레코드의 기능요건, 전거데이터의 기능요건, 주제전거 데이터의 기능요건, 객체지향형 FRBR, FRBR 도서관 참조 모형, FRBR Family Models, FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD, FRBRoo, Consolidated FRBR, FRBR Library Reference Model(FRBR LRM)

참고문헌

1.

Bekiari, C. et al. 2015. FRBR Object-Oriented Definition and Mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD (version 2.3). International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation.

2.

Coyle, K. 2014. FRBR, Twenty Years On. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(3/4):265-285.

3.

Coyle, K. 2015. FRBR Before and After: A Look at Our Bibliographic Modes. Chicago: ALA.

4.

Davis, I., and Newman, R. 2005. Expression of Core FRBR Concepts in RDF. [online]. [cited 2016. 1. 5.] <http://vocab.org/frbr/core>

5.

Gueguen, G. et al. 2013. Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description:A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives’ Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.

6.

IFLA FRBR Review Group. 2009. Meeting Report, August 25-26, 2009, Milan. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.] <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbrrg/meeting_2009.pdf>

7.

IFLA Study Group on the FRBR. 2009. Functional Requirements For Bibliographic Records:Final Report. Den Haag: IFLA.

8.

IFLA Working Group on FRANAR. 2009. Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. Den Haag: IFLA.

9.

IFLA Working Group on the FRSAR. 2010. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): A Conceptual Model. Den Haag: IFLA.

10.

The Music Ontology. 2015. The Music Ontology Homepage. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.]<musicontology.com>

11.

Oliver, C. 2015. IFLA’s Conceptual Models: Impact and Evolution. Presentation material at IFLA WLIC 2015, August 19, Cape Town.

12.

Peroni, S., and Shotton, D. 2012. FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for Describing Bibliographic Resources and Citations. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 17, 33-43.

13.

Raimond, Y. et al. 2007. The Music Ontology. Sydney: Australian Computer Society.

14.

Riva, P., and Oliver, C. 2015. Beyond FRBR: FRBRoo and the Consolidated FRBR Model.Presentation material of Canadian Library Association Conference, June 4, 2015, Ottawa:Shaw Centre.

15.

Riva, P., and Žumer, M. 2015. Introducing the FRBR Library Reference Model. Presentation material at IFLA WLIC 2015, August 19, Cape Town.

16.

Shotton, D. 2010. Introducing the Semantic Publishing and Referencing (SPAR) Ontologies. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.]<https://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/>

17.

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research. 2015. Protégé 3.4.2. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 5.] <http://protege.stanford.edu/>

18.

Willer, M., and Dunsire, G. 2013. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

19.

Žumer, M. 2015. Modeling Versions of KOS with FRBR: With a Short Introduction to FRBR Consolidation. Presentation material of the 1st NKOS Workshop at ICADL, December 9, 2015, Seoul: Yonsei University.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책