바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

이성교제에서 원하지 않는 성관계 요구의 응낙에 대한 설명모형-대학생중심으로-

An Explanatory Model of Unwanted Sexual Compliance with Dating Partners among College Students

초록

본 연구는 이성교제에서 파트너로부터 원하지 않는 성관계 요구를 받고 이에 응낙한 경험이 있다고 응답한 19개 대학 2학년이상 남녀 학생 800명(남학생 366명, 여학생 434명)을 대상으로, 애착, 성관계 권력, 관계몰입의 차이, 응낙 동기, 성관계 빈도 및 교제기간 등이 원하지 않는 성관계 요구의 응낙에 미치는 효과를 분석하여 그 이론적 모형을 성별에 따라 AMOS 4.0을 이용하여 검증하였다. 모형검증 결과는 성에 따라 공통점과 차이점이 있었다. 공통점으로는 첫째, 남녀 모두 개인의 애착요소 중 불안수준이 성관계 권력에는 부적효과를, 관계몰입차이와 성적 응낙동기에는 정적효과를 미치고 있었으며, 불안은 성관계 응낙 동기를 통하여 이성교제에서 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙에 간접적으로 효과를 미쳤다. 즉 개인의 불안 수준이 높을수록 성관계 응낙 동기가 높아지며, 응낙 동기가 높아질수록 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙을 더 많이 하였다. 둘째, 이성교제에서 성관계 빈도는 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙에 정적 효과를 미쳤다. 차이점으로는 첫째, 남학생집단에서는 의존은 성적 응낙동기에 부적 효과를 나타내며 접근은 관계 몰입차이에 정적 효과를 나타낸 반면에 여학생 집단에서는 의존과 접근은 관계 구조에 유의한 효과를 보이지 않았다. 둘째, 남학생은 애착 요소인 의존 수준이 성관계 응낙 동기를 통하여 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙에 간접적으로 효과를 미쳤으며, 여학생은 애착요소인 접근수준이 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙에 직접 효과를 미쳤다. 셋째, 여학생 집단에서만 성관계 권력이 불안수준과 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙사이를 중재하고 있었으며 또한 교제기간이 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙에 정적 효과를 미쳤다. 이러한 연구 결과들의 의의와 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
unwanted sexual compliance, attachment, sexual relationship power, difference in relationship commitment, reasons for sexual compliance, 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙, 애착, 성관계 권력, 관계몰입의 차이, 성관계 응낙 동기, unwanted sexual compliance, attachment, sexual relationship power, difference in relationship commitment, reasons for sexual compliance

Abstract

This study examined how the factors such as attachment, sexual relationship power, difference in relationship commitment, reasons for sexual compliance, frequency of sexual activity and relationship duration affected unwanted sexual compliance, and developed an explanatory model of those factors' effectiveness separately by gender. Eight hundred students(366 men and 434 women) from sophomore to senior of 19 colleges in Korea, who had consented to unwanted sex with a dating partner, participated in this study. Consensual unwanted sex scale, revised adult attachment scale(RAAS), sexual relationship power scale(SRPS), relationship commitment questionnaire(RCQ) and reasons for sexual compliance questionnaire were used as the instruments. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Pearson correlational analysis, t-test and structural equation modeling using SPSSWIN 11.0 and AMOS 4.0. Findings are as follows; Two significant paths were appeared among men. First, the higher individual anxiety level caused the higher reasons for sexual compliance, and the more unwanted sexual compliance appeared accordingly. Second, the less individual dependence level caused the higher reasons for sexual compliance, and the more unwanted sexual compliance appeared accordingly. Three significant paths were appeared among women. First, the higher individual anxiety level caused the less sexual relationship power, and the more unwanted sexual compliance appeared accordingly. Second, the higher individual anxiety level caused the higher reasons for sexual compliance, and the more unwanted sexual compliance appeared accordingly. Third, the individual closeness level affected women directly in unwanted sexual compliance. The higher closeness level caused the more unwanted sexual compliance.

keywords
unwanted sexual compliance, attachment, sexual relationship power, difference in relationship commitment, reasons for sexual compliance, 원하지 않는 성관계 응낙, 애착, 성관계 권력, 관계몰입의 차이, 성관계 응낙 동기, unwanted sexual compliance, attachment, sexual relationship power, difference in relationship commitment, reasons for sexual compliance

참고문헌

1.

(2001) 대학생의 애착 사랑유형에 따른 성행동, 동국대학교

2.

(2004) 성폭력 피해 구성과 그 의미에 관한 연구, 이화여자대학교

3.

(2001) 성인애착과 이성관계 만족, 고려대학교

4.

(2000) 일개 대학 대학생들의 성지식 태도 경험에 관한 조사연구,

5.

(2003) 소식지 나눔터 ,

6.

(1997) Commitment and mental representation of close relationships ,

7.

(1988) Considerations for prevention of HIV infection among Hispanic women Psychology of Women Quarterly,

8.

(1997) Researching sexual behavior: Methodological Issues., The University of Indiana Press

9.

(1991) Attachment styles among young adults A test of a four-category model Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

10.

(2002) Cultural suppression of female sexuality,

11.

(1985) Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse,

12.

(1990) and relationship quality in dating couples Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58,

13.

(2001) Attachment security in adult partnerships, Brunner-Routledge.

14.

(1987) Gender differences in sexual scenarios State University of New York Press,

15.

(1992) Australian Journal of Psychology 44,

16.

(2002) Relationship Power, decision making, and sexual relations: an exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin,

17.

(2000) Patterns of Conflict Resolution Within Relationships and Coercive Sexual Behavior of Men and Women A Journal of Research,

18.

(2000) Saying "yes" but thinking "no": Consensual participation in unwanted sex. ,

19.

(2002b) Why some women consent to unwanted sex with a dating partner:Insights from attachment theory,

20.

(2003) Sexual compliance: gender, motivational, and relationship.,

21.

(1992) Insiders' views of marital sex Journal of Sex Research,

22.

(1994) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66,

23.

(1998) Behavioral and experiential patterns of avoidantly and securely attached women across adulthood: A 31-year longitudinal perspective.,

24.

(1991) Correlates of relationship satisfaction in cohabiting gay and lesbian couples Integration of contextual Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

25.

(1989199-209) Reasons for having and avoiding sex and relationship to sexual behavior Journal of Sex Research,

26.

(1985) Department of psychology University of California, Unpublished manuscript

27.

(1999) Avoidant/ ambivalent attachment style as a mediator between abusive childhood experiences and adult relationship difficulties,

28.

(1984) Social desirability in the bedroom:Role of approval motivation in sexual relationships,

29.

(1998) Feigning sexual desire:Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships,

30.

(2000) Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research,

31.

(1984) Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males,

32.

(1995) Remaining in an abusive relationship:An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary commitment,

33.

(1998) The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size,

34.

(1998) Cognitive underpinning of narrative attachment assessment ,

35.

(2000) Application of the Theory of Gender and Power to examine HIV related exposures, risk factors and effective interventions for women. ,

36.

(2004) 원 고 접 수 일,

37.

상담 및 심리치료,

38.

The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy,

39.

An Explanatory Model of Unwanted Sexual Compliance,

40.

with Dating Partners among College Students,

41.

This study examined how the factors such as attachment difference in relationship commitment reasons for sexual compliance frequency of sexual activity and relationship duration affected unwanted sexual compliance and developed an explanatory model of those factors' effectiveness separately by gender from sophomore to senior of 19 colleges in Korea who had consented to unwanted sex with a dating partner participated in this study,

logo