ISSN : 1229-0696
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between the HEXACO six personality factors(Honesty, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Openness, and Conscientiousness) and a variety of performance in work organizations. First of all, some items of modesty(subfactor of Honesty) in Korean HEXACO personality inventory were modified and half-length form(96 items) of Korean HEXACO personality inventory was constructed by using 353 undergraduates sample. The half-length form of Korean HEXACO personality inventory was administered to 315 employees and personality ratings were obtained by self-report. The sixty-three peers or supervisors who knew employees very well rated employees` six personality factors and their various performance(task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance, workplace deviance, and overall performance). Correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were conducted to examine the relationships between the six personality factors and the five performance criteria. Results indicated that the six personality factors by both self and other rating were found to have significant relationships with the five performance criteria. Also, hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the influence of the six personality factors on each of the five performance criteria controlling for differences in employees` demographic variables(gender, age, and tenure) which were entered into the regression equation first. The result showed that six personality factors significantly explained the variance of most performance criteria after controlling for the effect of demographic variables. Task performance had the strongest impact on overall performance. And the second was adaptive performance, the third was workplace deviance, and the forth was contextual performance. Workplace deviance mediated the relationship between Honesty and overall performance, and task performance mediated the relationship between Conscientiousness and overall performance. Based on these findings, the implication of this study and the directions for further research were discussed.
김도영, 유태용 (2002). 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 15(2), 1-24.
김천석, 유태용 (2005). 정서지능, 인지능력, 성격의 구성개념간 변별성과 정서지능의 과업수행, 맥락수행, 적응수행에 대한 증분타당도 검증. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18(2), 271-298.
남재봉 (1999). 관리자의 성격유형과 직무성과와의 관계성 고찰. 1999년 한국 산업 및 조직심리학회 추계 학술대회 발표논문집, 58-76.
민병모 (1998). 5요인을 통해 본 한국기업 중간관리자들의 성격특성. 1998년 한국 산업 및 조직심리학회 추계 학술대회 발표논문집, 19-28.
민병모, 박두진 (2000). NEO PI-R로 본 성격과 직무성과 준거간의 관계: 금융서비스 기업의 중간관리자를 대상으로. 2000년 한국 산업 및 조직심리학회 추계 심포지엄 및 학술대회 발표논문집, 53-61.
민병모, 이경임, 정재창 (1997). NEO 인성검사(NEO PI-RS). PSI컨설팅.
유태용 역(2006). 산업 및 조직심리학(8판). 시그마프레스.
유태용, 김명언, 이도형 (1997). 5요인 성격검사의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 10(1), 85-102.
유태용, 민병모 (2001). 다양한 장면에서 수행을 예측하기 위한 5요인 성격모델의 사용가능성과 한계: 성격요인과 수행간의 관계에 대한 통합분석. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 14(2), 115-134.
유태용, 박태구 (1999). 신임경찰 교육장면에서 성격의 5요인 및 생활경험과 수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 12(2), 129-144.
유태용, 이도형 (1997). 다양한 직군에서의 성격의 5요인과 직무수행간의 관계. 기업경영연구, 제 5권, 69-94. 광운대학교 기업경영연구소.
유태용, 이기범, Ashton, M. C. (2004). 한국판 HEXACO 성격검사의 구성타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 61-75.
이기범, 유태용, Ashton, M. C. (2003). 새로운 6요인 성격구조 이론: 산업 및 조직심리학적 시사점. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16(3), 89-105.
Allen, T. D., Barnard, S., Rush, M. C., & Russell, J. E. (2000). Ratings of organizational citizenship behavior: Does the source make a difference? Human Resource Management Review, 10, 97-114.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis of major personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2002). Six independent factors of personality description: A response to Saucier. European Journal of Personality, 16, 63-75.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R.. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality- descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-721.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Son, C. (2000). Honesty as the sixth factor of personality: correlations with Machiavellianism, Psychopathy, and Social Adroitness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 359-368.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relations between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
Beaty, J. C., Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R. (2001). The relation between personality and contextual performance in "strong" versus "weak" situations. Human Performance, 14, 125-148.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman(Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations(pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology(2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press: New York.
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory Revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.
Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 67-80.
Gellatly, I. R., & Irving, P. G. (2001). Personality, autonomy, and contextual performance of managers. Human Performance, 14, 231-245.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg University Press: The Netherlands.
Harper, D. (1990). Spotlight abuse-save profits. Industrial Distribution, 79, 47-51.
Harpur, T. J., Hare, R. D., & Hakstian, A. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6-17.
Hogan, R. & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
Hogan, R. & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Introduction: personality and industrial and organizational psychology. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace. American Psychological Association: Washington D.C.
Hrebickova, M. (1995). The structural model of personality based on the lexical analysis：A Czech replication study of the five-factor model based on a comprehensive taxonomy of personality- descriptive adjectives. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic：Brno.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory Revised Manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. New York: Harper & Row.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131-142.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Shin, K. H. (2005). Personality correlates of workplace anti-social behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 81-98.
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & De Vries, R. (2003, August). Predicting workplace delinquency using personality: Findings from three countries. Paper presented at the meeting of Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 151-158.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr., (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
McDaniel, M. A., & Frei, R. L. (1994). Validity of customer service measures in personnel selection: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Akron.
McGurn, X. (1988). Spotting the thieves who work among us. Wall Street Journal, p. 16a.
McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, R. J. Klimoski(Eds.), Handbook of psychology(Vol. 12, pp. 39-53). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
Mount, M. K., Johnson, E. C., Ilies, R., & Barrick, M. R. (2002). Personality and Job Performance: Test of the Mediating Role of Workplace Deviance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validation: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S, Dovonan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624.
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66-80.
Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behavior. International Journal of Selection of Assessment, 10, 117-125.
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10, 61-77.
Schneider, R. J., & Hough, L. M. (1995). Personality and industrial/organizational psychology. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson(Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology(pp. 75-129). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D., N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAFASD Technical Report, 61-97.