open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0696
This study examined the effects of different percentages of incentive pay on the performance of a simulated work task when the opportunities for off-task behaviors were available. The independent variable was the percentage of incentive pay. Three percentages of incentive pay were examined: 0%, 30%, and 50%. An alternating treatment design was adopted. The three experimental conditions were randomly alternated for each participant, each experimental condition being administered seven times for the whole experiment. Participants were 4 college students. Participants performed a simulated work task on the computer that consisted of computer-related activities such as dragging, clicking, and typing. The dependent variables were the number of correctly completed work tasks and the amount of idle time (time spent for engaging in off-task behaviors). The results indicated that the performance under the 30% and 50% incentive conditions were significantly higher than that under the 0% condition. However, performance under the 30% and 50% conditions did not differ statistically. Also, the amount of idle time under the 0% condition was higher than that under the 30% and 50% conditions, while the amount of idle time under the 30% and 50% conditions did not differ statistically. In addition, it was revealed that performance was significantly correlated with the amount of idle time(r=-.983). The results suggest that more realistic simulation is necessary to examine the effects of different percentages of incentive on work performance.
오세진, 이요행 (2005). 성과급 비율의 차이가 직무수행에 미치는 영향에 대한 검증, 한국심리학회; 산업 및 조직, 18, 481-497.
Abernathy, W. B. (2001). Enterprise: An organization-wide performance pay system. Memphis, TN: Productivity Development Systems.
Allison, D. B., Silverstein, J. M., & Galante, V. (1992). Relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cooperative, competitive, and independent monetary incentive systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 13, 85-112.
Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
Blinder, A. S. (1990). Introduction. In A. S. Blinder (Ed.). Paying for productivity: A look at the evidence (pp. 1-13). Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.
Bucklin, B. R., & Dickinson, A. M. (2001). Individual Monetary Incentives: A Review of Different Types of Arrangements Between Performance and Pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 45-137.
Conrad, C. (1994). Strategic organizational communication: Toward the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Culing, K. M. (2005). The effects of individual monetary incentive with individual feedback and group monetary incentives with group feedback on high performance(Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 2005). Dissertation Abstract International, 66(07), p. 3933.
Dickinson, A. M., & Gillette, K. L. (1993). A comparison of the effects of two individual monetary incentive systems on productivity: Piece rate pay versus base pay plus incentives. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 14, 3-82.
Dierks, W., & McNally, K. (1987). Incentives you can bank on. Personnel Administrator, 32, 61-65.
Farr, J. L. (1976). Incentive schedules, productivity, and satisfaction in work groups: A laboratory study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 159-170.
Fein, M. (1970). Wage incentive plans. Norcross, GA: American Institute of Industrial Engineers.
Frederiksen, L. W., & Johnson, R. P. (1981). Organizational behavior management. Progress in Behavior Modification, 12, 67-118.
Frisch, C. J., & Dickinson, A. M. (1990). Work productivity as a function of the percentage of monetary incentives to base pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11, 13-34.
Hopkins, B. L., & Sears, J. (1982). Managing behavior for productivity. In L. W. Frederiksen(Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior Management (pp. 393-425). New York: John Wiley.
Gaetani, J. J., Hoxeng, D. G., & Austin, J. T. (1985). Engineering compensation systems: Effects of commissioned versus wage payment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7, 51-63.
George, J. T., & Hopkins, B. L. (1989). Multiple effects of performance-contingent pay for waitpersons. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 131-141.
Henderson, R. I. (1985). Compensation management: Rewarding performance (4th ed.). Reston, VA: Reston.
Honeywell, J. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Poling, A. (1997). Individual performance as a function of individual and group pay contingencies. The Psychological Record, 47, 261-274.
Jenkins, G. D., Gupta, N., Mitra, A., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance: A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 777-787.
Komaki, J. L., Coombs, T., Reddings T. P., Jr., & Schepman, S. (2000). A rich and rigorous examination of applied behavior analysis research in the world of work. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (Vol. 15), (pp. 265-366). New York: John Wiley.
LaMere, J. M., Dickinson, A. M., Henry, M., Henry, G., & Poling, A. D. (1996). Effects of a multicomponent monetary incentive program on the performance of truck drivers. Behavior Modification, 20, 385-405.
Lawler, E. E., III. (1990). Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
London, M., & Oldham, G. (1976). Effects of varying goal types and incentive systems on performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 537-546.
McGee, H. M. (2004). The effects of individual and group incentive on high performance (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 2004). Dissertation Abstract International, 66(07), p. 3933.
Matthews, G. A., & Dickinson, A. M. (2000). Effects of alternative activities on time allocated to task performance under different percentages of incentive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 20, 327
Mawhiney, T. C. (1982). Maximizing versus matching in people versus pigeons. Psychological Reports, 50, 267-281.
Mawhinney, T. C. (1984). Philosophical and ethical aspects of Organizational Behavior Management: Some evaluative feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 6, 5-31.
McAdams, J. L., & Hawk, E. J. (1992). Capitalizing on human assets. Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association.
Nebeker, D. M., & Neuberger, B. M. (1985). Productivity improvement in a purchasing division: The impact of a performance contingent reward system: Evaluation and Program Planning, 3, 121-134.
O'Hara, K., Johnson, C. M., & Beehr, T. A. (1985). Organizational behavior management in the private sector: A review of empirical research and recommendations for further investigation. Academy of Management Review, 10, 848-864.
Perry, N. J. (1988). Here come richer, riskier pay plans. Fortune, December, 19, pp. 51-58.
Riedel, J. A., Nebeker, D. M., & Cooper, B. L. (1988). The influence of monetary incentives on goal choice, goal commitment, and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 155-180.
Smoot, D. A., & Duncan, P. K. (1997). The search for optimum individual monetary incentive pay system: A comparison of the effects of flat pay and linear and non-linear pay systems on worker productivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 17, 5-75.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1997). A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975-95. Academy of Management Review, 10, 848-864.
Thurkow, N. M., Bailey, J. S., & Stamper, M. R. (2000). The Effects of Group and Individual Monetary Incentive on Productivity of Telephone Interviewers. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 20(2), 3-25.
Vough, E. F. (1979). Productivity: A practical program for improving efficiency. New York: Amacom.