바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The relationship between perceived team motivationand team effectiveness

Abstract

Organizational or team work is now recognized as important issue to respond to dynamic business environment. Thus, measuring group or team motivation is essential for managing organization effectively. This research’s aim was to demonstrate that perceived team motivation is important factor as well as work motivation (individual level motivation) to enhance team productivity. In study 1, We developed the perceived team motivation test. Factor analysis yield following two factors: active team motivation and passive team motivation. In study 2, we examined the effect of perceived team motivation on job satisfaction and job commitment. In the result of regression analysis, active team level motivation and internal motivation(individual work motivation) has significant impact on job commitment and job satisfaction which means that team level motivation has influence as much as work motivation in organization setting.

keywords
perceived team motivation, work motivation, job commitment, job satisfaction, job characteristics, 지각된 팀동기, 직무동기, 직무만족, 직무몰입, 직무특성

Reference

1.

강혜련, (2003) 지식근로자 팀 효과성의 선행요인:구성원의 인지적 유사성 vs 속인적 유사성, 지식경영연구

2.

강혜련, (2003) 공유멘탈모델의 선행요인 및 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향.한국, 한국심리학회지

3.

고광환 ; 송영렬, (2004) 지식공유가 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 전문경영인연구

4.

최홍섭 ; 송선옥, (2001) e-Business에서의 수익모델에 관한 연구, 산업경제연구

5.

박경규, (2002) 인사고과의 새로운 접근 팀 평가를 중심으로, 서강경영논총

6.

이갑두 ; 박기석, (2004) 팀수준의 관점별 성과측정치와 구성원만족도,조직성과 간의 관련성, 산업경제연구

7.

안길찬, (2002) 팀제조직의 모델에 관한 - B S C모델을 중심으로 -, 생산성논집

8.

오인근, (2003) 사회복지사가 지각한 직무특성이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구,

9.

유재만, (2001) 팀제와 병원조직의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구,

10.

임성현, (2003) 역량확대수준이 직무만족,직무몰입,그리고 직무성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구,

11.

임희정, (2005) 지식근로자 팀 효과성의 영향요인: 팀심성모형과 팀 분산기억, 한국 인사조직학회 2005년 춘계학술연구발표회

12.

한주희, (2004) 팀생산성에 대한 리더-구성원 교환관계의 영향요인: 종단적 연구를 중심으로, 생산성논집

13.

황종오 ; 유태용 ; 한태영, (2006) 팀성격과 팀내 조직시민행동 규범이 구성원의 조직시민행동에 미치는 효과: 다수준 구성타당화 접근, 산업 및 조직

14.

Barrick, M. R., (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work team processes and team effectiveness, Journal of Applied Psychology

15.

Campion, M. A., (1993) Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness?implications for designing effective work groups, Personnel Psychology

16.

Chan, D, (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different level of analysis: A typology of composition models, Journal of applied Psychology

17.

Clark,R.E, (2003) Fostering the work motivation of individuals and teams.Performance, Performance Improvement

18.

ersick, C. J. G., (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

19.

Gladstein, D. L, (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly

20.

Guay, F., (2000) On the assessment of the situational?intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS), Motivation and Emotion

21.

Guzzo, R. A., (1993) Potency in groups: Articulating a construct, British Journal of Social Psychology

22.

Hackman,J.R., (1987) The design of work teams. in Handbook of Organizational Life, Prentice-Hall

23.

Hackman, J. R., (1975) Development of Job Diagnostic Survey, Journal of Applied Psychology

24.

Herzberg F, (1959) The Motivation to Work, John Wiley & Sons

25.

Kanungo, R. N, (1981) Work alienation and involvement: Problems and prospects, International Review of Applied Psychology

26.

Karau S. J., (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

27.

Katzenbach, J. R., (1998) Wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization, McGraw-Hill

28.

Kerr,N, (1983) Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

29.

Klein, K. J., (2001) Is everyone is agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment, Journal of Applied Psychology

30.

Latane, B., (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

31.

Lodhal, T M, (1965) he Definition and Measurement of Job involvement, Journal of Applied Psychology

32.

Madhavan, R., (1998) From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management, Journal of Marketing

33.

Manz,C., (1990) Beyond self-managing teams: towards self-leading teams in the workplace, in Research in Organizational Change and Development, 273-99

34.

Muchinsky, P. M, (2003) sychology Applied to Work, 7th ed, Wadsworth

35.

Bandura, A. I, (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, W.H. Freeman and Company

36.

edra, R., (1993) Complex interdependence in task-performing groups, Journal of Applied Psychology

37.

Salas, E., (2005) Is there a “Big five” in teamwork, Small Group Research

38.

Sims, H. P., (1976) The Measurement of Job Characteristics, Academy of Management Journal

39.

Smith, K. G., (1994) op management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication, Administrative Science Quarterly

40.

Weissenberg, P., (1968) Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Job Involvement, Journal of Applied Psychology

41.

Zaccaro,S.J., (2001) Team Leadership., The Leadership Quarterly

logo