바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

A Conceptual and Empirical Approach to Creativityin Industrial Organizations

Abstract

We employed a conceptual and empirical approach to exploring the meaning of creativity in industrial organizations. In study1 we defined the prototype of creativity in industrial organizations as “everyday and reactive creativity”. Employing Rosch's(1975) conceptualization of concepts, we do not exclude professional and proactive creativity in the definition of our prototype. Since this prototype was defined with product, persuasion, and process, we conducted Study2 to investigate the degree to which person characteristics in industrial organizations are consistent with the prototype. To connect conceptual approach and empirical data of individual employees in industrial organizations, we employed Amabile's (1996) three components model for creative performance. As a result factors representing the three components were obtained. The factors resemble some factors in the scale of everyday creativity developed elsewhere and implied conditions of reactive and expected behaviors required in industrial organizations, which are consistent with our definition of the prototype. On the other hand implicit theory of creative properties for individuals turned out to be discrepant from explicit theories and play an important role in the organizational practice with regard to creativity. It is suggested to make attempts to reduce the gap between implicit and explicit theories in order to ensure rationality in creativity management in industrial organizations.

keywords
창의성, 내재이론, 명시적 이론, 영역효과, 산업조직 창의성, Creativity, Implicit Theory, Explicit Theory, Domain Effect, Creativity in Industrial organizations

Reference

1.

이순묵 ; 한기순, (2004) 창의성의 영역일반성과 영역특수성 연구에서의 문제 및 대안으로서의 잠재변수 모형, 교육심리연구

2.

이정규, (2003) 창의성 연구에 있어서 영역성과 측정에 대한 문제점 분석연구, 교육심리연구

3.

이정은, (2001) 창의성에 대한 일반인의 암묵이론과 실제로 창의적인 사람들의 특성에 기초한 요인구조 탐색 및 비교, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직

4.

정은이, (2002) 일상적-전문적 창의성의 암묵이론적 구조, 교육심리연구

5.

정은이 ; 박용한, (2002) 일상적 창의성 척도의 개발 및 타당화, 교육문제연구

6.

최인수, (1998) 창의성 성취와 관련된 제 요인들:창의적 연구의 최근 모델인 체계모델(Systems Model)을 중심으로, 미래유아교육학회지

7.

최일호, (2001) 새로운 생각은 어떻게 가능한가:전문분야 창의성에 대한 학습과정 모형접근, 한국심리학회지:일반

8.

한기순, (2000) 창의성의 영역한정성과 영역보편성에 관한 분석과 탐구, 영재교육연구

9.

Amabile,T.M., (1983) The social psychology of creativity:A componential conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

10.

Amabile,T.M., (1996) Creativity in context:Update to the social psychology of creativity, Westview Press

11.

Baer,J., (1991) Generality of creativity across performance domains, Creativity Research Journal

12.

Browne,M.W., (1998) CEFA: Comprehensive exploratory factor analysis, WWW document and computer program, URL http:// quantrm2.psy.ohio-state.edu/browne/.

13.

Cohen,J., (1975) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, The weighted varimax rotation and the promax rotation

14.

Cropley,A.J., (1997) Creativity and Mental Health in everyday life in Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health , Ablex Publishing

15.

Csikszentmihalyi,M., (1988) Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity in The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, Cambridge University Press

16.

Cureton,E.E., (1975) The weighted varimax rotation and the promax rotation, Psychometrika

17.

Davis,G.A., (1986) Creative is forever, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt

18.

Deci,E.L., (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

19.

Domino,G., (1997) Creativity in Three Samples of Photographers: A Validation of the Adjective Check List Creativity Scale, Creativity Research Journal

20.

Gardner,H., (1983) Frames of Mind:The theory of multiple intelligences, Basic Books

21.

King,N., (1995) Innovation and Change in Organizations, Routledge

22.

Lingemann,L.S., (1982) Assessing creativity from a diagnostic perspective: The creative attribute profile,

23.

Little,T.D., (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits, Structural Equation Modeling

24.

Mansfield,R.S., (1981) The Psychology of Creativity and Discovery-Scientists and Their Work, Nelson-Hall

25.

McCrae,R.R., (1987) Creativity, divergence thinking and openess to experience, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

26.

Mumford,M.D., (1988) Creativity syndrome:Integration,application,and innovation, Psychological Bulletin

27.

Neisser,U., (1979) The concept of intelligence, Intelligence

28.

Richards,R., (1993) Everyday Creativity, Eminent Creativity, and Psychopathology, Psychological Inquiry,

29.

Richards,R., (1997) Mood swings and creativity in Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health , Ablex Publishing

30.

Rosch,E.R., (1975) Universals and specifics in human categorization in -cultural perspectives on learning, Halsted

31.

Runco,M.A., (1986) Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity, The journal of creative behavior

32.

Runco,M.A., (1997) Eminent creativity,everyday creativity,and health, Ablex Publishing

33.

Runco,M.A., (1984) Teacher's judgments of creativity and social validity of divergent thinking tests, Perceptual and Motor Skills

34.

Simonton,D.K., (1988) Age and outstanding achievement:What do we know after a century of research? , Psychological Bulletin

35.

Stein,M., (1953) Creativity and culture, Journal of Psychology

36.

Sternberg,R.J., (1995) Defying the crowd:Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity, The Free Press

37.

Sternberg,R.J., (1985) Beyond IQ:A triarchic theory of human intelligence, Cambridge University Press

38.

Sternberg,R.J., (1985) Implicit theories of intelligence,creativity,and wisdom, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

39.

Unsworth,K., (2001) Unpacking creativity, Academy of Management Review

40.

Wakefield,J.F., (1991) The outlook for creativity tests, Journal of Creative Behavior

logo